Literature DB >> 25767059

Traditional karyotyping vs copy number variation sequencing for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage.

S Liu1, L Song1, D S Cram2, L Xiong1, K Wang1, R Wu1, J Liu3, K Deng1, B Jia1, M Zhong1, F Yang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of traditional G-banding karyotyping with that of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq) for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with miscarriage.
METHODS: Products of conception (POC) were collected from spontaneous miscarriages. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected using high-resolution G-banding karyotyping and CNV sequencing. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction analysis of maternal and POC DNA for short tandem repeat (STR) markers was used to both monitor maternal cell contamination and confirm the chromosomal status and sex of the miscarriage tissue.
RESULTS: A total of 64 samples of POC, comprising 16 with an abnormal and 48 with a normal karyotype, were selected and coded for analysis by CNV-Seq. CNV-Seq results were concordant for 14 (87.5%) of the 16 gross chromosomal abnormalities identified by karyotyping, including 11 autosomal trisomies and three sex chromosomal aneuploidies (45,X). Of the two discordant results, a 69,XXX polyploidy was missed by CNV-Seq, although supporting STR marker analysis confirmed the triploidy. In contrast, CNV-Seq identified a sample with 45,X karyotype as a 45,X/46,XY mosaic. In the remaining 48 samples of POC with a normal karyotype, CNV-Seq detected a 2.58-Mb 22q deletion associated with DiGeorge syndrome and nine different smaller CNVs of no apparent clinical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: CNV-Seq used in parallel with STR profiling is a reliable and accurate alternative to karyotyping for identifying chromosome copy number abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage.
Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploidy; copy number variation sequencing; karyotyping; miscarriage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767059     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  21 in total

1.  Whole-genome sequencing analysis of CNV using low-coverage and paired-end strategies is efficient and outperforms array-based CNV analysis.

Authors:  Bo Zhou; Steve S Ho; Xianglong Zhang; Reenal Pattni; Rajini R Haraksingh; Alexander E Urban
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Characterization of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancy losses reveals critical genes and loci for human early development.

Authors:  Yiyun Chen; Justin Bartanus; Desheng Liang; Hongmin Zhu; Amy M Breman; Janice L Smith; Hua Wang; Zhilin Ren; Ankita Patel; Pawel Stankiewicz; David S Cram; Sau Wai Cheung; Lingqian Wu; Fuli Yu
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Chromosomal Copy Number Variation Analysis in Pregnancy Products from Recurrent and Sporadic Miscarriage Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Xia Zhang; Heming Wu; Zhonghang Gu; Zhikang Yu; Liubing Lan; Qingyan Huang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Expanding the Scope of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing to Detect Fetal Chromosomal Copy Number Variations.

Authors:  Songchang Chen; Lanlan Zhang; Jiong Gao; Shuyuan Li; Chunxin Chang; Yiyao Chen; Hongjun Fei; Junyu Zhang; Yanlin Wang; Hefeng Huang; Chenming Xu; Daru Lu
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-12

5.  Copy number variation sequencing combined with quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction in clinical application of pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Li Wang; Feng Tang; Yang Zeng; Daishu Yin; Cong Zhou; Hongmei Zhu; Linping Li; Lili Zhang; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Genetic and Clinical Features of Heterotaxy in a Prenatal Cohort.

Authors:  Tong Yi; Hairui Sun; Yuwei Fu; Xiaoyan Hao; Lin Sun; Ye Zhang; Jiancheng Han; Xiaoyan Gu; Xiaowei Liu; Yong Guo; Xin Wang; Xiaoxue Zhou; Siyao Zhang; Qi Yang; Jiaqi Fan; Yihua He
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Low-pass whole-genome sequencing in clinical cytogenetics: a validated approach.

Authors:  Zirui Dong; Jun Zhang; Ping Hu; Haixiao Chen; Jinjin Xu; Qi Tian; Lu Meng; Yanchou Ye; Jun Wang; Meiyan Zhang; Yun Li; Huilin Wang; Shanshan Yu; Fang Chen; Jiansheng Xie; Hui Jiang; Wei Wang; Kwong Wai Choy; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Cytogenetic analysis of spontaneously discharged products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Nobuaki Ozawa; Haruhiko Sago; Kentaro Matsuoka; Tetsuo Maruyama; Ohsuke Migita; Yoshinori Aizu; Johji Inazawa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-24

9.  Deletion of exon 4 in LAMA2 is the most frequent mutation in Chinese patients with laminin α2-related muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Lin Ge; Aijie Liu; Kai Gao; Renqian Du; Juan Ding; Bing Mao; Ying Hua; Xiaoli Zhang; Dandan Tan; Haipo Yang; Xiaona Fu; Yanbin Fan; Ling Zhang; Shujuan Song; Jian Wu; Feng Zhang; Yuwu Jiang; Xiru Wu; Hui Xiong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Discrepancy of QF-PCR, CMA and karyotyping on a de novo case of mosaic isodicentric Y chromosomes.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Li Guo; Hanbiao Chen; Jian Lu; Jingjing Hu; Xianzheng Li; Xing Li; Ting Wang; Fengzhen Li; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.