| Literature DB >> 25766724 |
Jianxiang Wang1, Zhi-Xiang Shen2, Giuseppe Saglio3, Jie Jin4, He Huang4, Yu Hu5, Xin Du6, Jianyong Li7, Fanyi Meng8, Huanling Zhu9, Jianda Hu10, Jianmin Wang11, Ming Hou12, Sabine Hertle13, Hans D Menssen13, Christine-Elke Ortmann13, Catherine Tribouley14, Ye Yuan15, Michele Baccarani16, Xiaojun Huang17.
Abstract
Treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting BCR-ABL1 is currently the standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CML-CP). In this study, we present results of the ENESTchina (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-China) that was conducted to investigate nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib 400 mg once daily in a Chinese population. ENESTchina met its primary end point with a statistically significant higher rate of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL1 ≤0.1% on the International Scale) at 12 months in the nilotinib arm vs the imatinib arm (52.2% vs 27.8%; P < .0001), and MMR rates remained higher with nilotinib vs imatinib throughout the follow-up period. Rates of complete cytogenetic response (0% Philadelphia chromosome-positive [Ph+] metaphases by standard cytogenetics) were comparable and ≥80% by 24 months in both arms. The estimated rate of freedom from progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis at 24 months was 95.4% in each arm. The safety profiles of both drugs were similar to those from previous studies. In conclusion, rates of MMR at 12 months were superior with nilotinib vs imatinib in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01275196.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25766724 PMCID: PMC4416528 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-601674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113