Literature DB >> 25765588

Programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy zones to high ranges to prevent delivery of inappropriate device therapies in patients with primary prevention: results from the RISSY-ICD (Reduction of Inappropriate ShockS bY InCreaseD zones) trial.

Serkan Cay1, Ugur Canpolat2, Fatih Ucar2, Ozcan Ozeke2, Firat Ozcan2, Serkan Topaloglu2, Dursun Aras2.   

Abstract

Inappropriate shock is a frequently seen clinical problem despite advanced technologies used in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) devices. Our aim was to investigate whether simply raising the ICD detection zones can decrease inappropriate therapies while still providing appropriate therapy. We randomized 223 patients with primary prevention to either the conventional programming group with 3 zones as VT1 (167 to 182 beats/min) with discriminators, VT2 (182 to 200 beats/min) with discriminators, and ventricular fibrillation (>200 beats/min) (n=100) or the high-zone programming group with 3 zones as VT1 (171 to 200 beats/min) with discriminators, VT2 (200 to 230 beats/min) with discriminators, and ventricular fibrillation (>230 beats/min; n=101). Twenty-two patients were lost to follow-up. The primary objectives were the first episode of appropriate and inappropriate therapies. The secondary objectives were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. During 12-month follow-up, the first episode of appropriate therapy was higher (22% vs 10%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 4.36, p=0.028) and the first episode of inappropriate therapy was lower (5% vs 28%, HR 0.18 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.44], p<0.001) in the high-zone group compared with the conventional group. Although all-cause mortality did not differ (2% for the high-zone group vs 3% for the conventional group, HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.11 to 3.99], p>0.05), hospitalization for heart failure was significantly higher in the conventional group (13% vs 4%, HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.88], p=0.021). In conclusion, in a real-world population, high-zone settings of the single-, dual-, and triple-chamber ICDs were associated with reduction in inappropriate therapy while still providing appropriate therapy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25765588     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Device therapy: High-zone programming of ICDs reduces inappropriate shocks.

Authors:  Karina Huynh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  [Inappropriate ICD therapies: All problems solved with MADIT-RIT?].

Authors:  Christof Kolb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-21

3.  Should physicians instead of industry representatives be the main actor of cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up? (Super Follow-up).

Authors:  Çağın Mustafa Üreyen; Cem Yunus Baş; İsa Öner Yüksel; Görkem Kuş; Göksel Çağırcı; Şakir Arslan
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.596

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.