Literature DB >> 25763726

Rethinking the role of the radiologist: enhancing visibility through both traditional and nontraditional reporting practices.

Andrew J Gunn1, Mark D Mangano, Garry Choy, Dushyant V Sahani.   

Abstract

The written radiology report is the primary method by which the radiologist communicates examination findings to the referring physician and the patient. Unfortunately, despite recent efforts to improve radiology reporting practices, dissatisfaction with regard to traditional reporting practices continues among referring physicians and patients. Moreover, the current reporting paradigm limits the amount of interaction that radiologists can have with patients and referring physicians. To address these issues, organizational efforts have been made by the Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Radiology to educate the public about the role of the radiologist in patient care, provide resources for individuals to learn more about the practice of radiology, and assist radiologists in creating a more "patient-centered" practice. In addition, individual radiologists may want to consider making adjustments to their reporting practices to improve communication of examination findings and increase patient awareness of the radiologist's role in clinical care. Many opportunities exist for radiologists to make such changes, both within the traditional reporting model (decreasing barriers to communication, educating patients) and with implementation of various nontraditional reporting practices (eg, delivering examination results directly to patients, receiving structured feedback on reports, establishing a diagnostic radiology consultation clinic). The authors provide guidance for radiologists who wish to enhance their visibility in clinical care with use of both traditional and nontraditional reporting practices. (©)RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25763726     DOI: 10.1148/rg.352140042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  7 in total

1.  Implementation of a Point-of-Care Radiologist-Technologist Communication Tool in a Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Leonard Ong; Pierre Elnajjar; C Gregory Nyman; Thomas Mair; Krishna Juluru
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System-a Design Thinking-Based Approach.

Authors:  Faiq Shaikh; Kenneth Hendrata; Brian Kolowitz; Omer Awan; Rasu Shrestha; Christopher Deible
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement.

Authors:  Peter Y W Chan; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Preferences of referring physicians regarding the role of radiologists as direct communicators of test results.

Authors:  Nuri Erdoğan; Hakan İmamoğlu; Süreyya Burcu Görkem; Serap Doğan; Serkan Şenol; Ahmet Öztürk
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Image-Enabling the Patient Portal of an Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Akhil Dhamija; Jay A Moskovitz; Juli Bick; Timothy J OConnor; Jennifer Regan; Laurie A Perry; David Hulefeld; Eric Schwieterman; Evan Slavik; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey.

Authors:  Ciarra Halaska; Peter Sachs; Kate Sanfilippo; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  What radiologists need to know about patients' expectations: P.A.T.I.E.N.T.S C.A.R.E.R.S A.I.M.S.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-03-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.