| Literature DB >> 25763315 |
V K Vaishnavi Vedam1, Karen Boaz2, Srikant Natarajan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral cancer is revisited on a pathologist perspective with advanced imaging technique.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25763315 PMCID: PMC4334036 DOI: 10.1155/2014/247853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) ISSN: 2210-7177 Impact factor: 2.916
This table depicts the new malignancy grading system of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients as proposed by Anneroth et al. (1986) [6] and Bryne et al. (1989 and 1991) [7, 8].
| Morphologic parameter | Histological grading of malignancy of tumor cell population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Degree of keratinization | Highly keratinized (>50% of the cells) | Moderately keratinized (20–50% of the cells) | Minimal keratinization (5–20% of the cells) | No keratinization (0–5% of the cells) |
|
| ||||
| Nuclear polymorphism | Little nuclear polymorphism (>75% mature cells) | Moderately abundant nuclear polymorphism | Abundant nuclear polymorphism (25–50% mature cells) | Extreme nuclear polymorphism (0–25% mature cells) |
|
| ||||
| Number of mitoses/HPF | 0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | >5 |
|
| ||||
| Pattern of invasion | Pushing well-delineated infiltrating borders | Infiltrating, solid cords, bands and/or strands | Small groups or cords of infiltrating cells ( | Marked and wide spread cellular dissociation in small groups of cells ( |
|
| ||||
| Lymphoplasmacytic infiltration | Marked | Moderate | Slight | None |
Bryne et al. grading system (Bryne et al., 1989) [7].
| Score | Grade |
|---|---|
| 5–8 | Good grade |
| 9–12 | Moderate grade |
| 13–16 | Poor grade |
Figure 1Stepwise description of Image J analysis.
Figure 2This graph depicts the relation of nuclear area at tumor proper with Anneroth et al. grading system in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients (graph depicted “tumour proper as TP”) (n = 32). The statistical significance was calculated using Chi-square test (value = 6.686) and statistical significance shown as ∗ P = 0.035.
Figure 3This graph depicts the relation of maximum diameter at tumor proper with Anneroth et al. grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients (graph depicted “maximum diameter tumor proper as Max diameter TP”) (n = 32). The statistical significance was calculated using Chi-square test (value = 7.351) and statistical significance shown as ∗ P = 0.025.
Figure 4This graph depicts the relation of maximum diameter at invasive front with Bryne et al. grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients (graph depicted “maximum diameter invasive tumour front as Max diameter ITF”) (n = 32). The statistical significance was calculated using Chi-square test and compared.
Figure 5This graph depicts the relation of nuclear area at invasive front with Bryne et al. grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients (graph depicted “area tumour proper as Area TP”) (n = 32). The statistical significance was calculated using Chi-square test and compared.