| Literature DB >> 25763110 |
Taotao Lao1, Kimberly Glass2, Weiliang Qiu1, Francesca Polverino3, Kushagra Gupta4, Jarrett Morrow1, John Dominic Mancini1, Linh Vuong1, Mark A Perrella5, Craig P Hersh6, Caroline A Owen7, John Quackenbush2, Guo-Cheng Yuan8, Edwin K Silverman6, Xiaobo Zhou6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The HHIP gene, encoding Hedgehog interacting protein, has been implicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and our subsequent studies identified a functional upstream genetic variant that decreased HHIP transcription. However, little is known about how HHIP contributes to COPD pathogenesis.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25763110 PMCID: PMC4355149 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-015-0137-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Figure 1mice demonstrated more severe airspace enlargement induced by cigarette smoke compared with wild-type littermate control mice. Airspace enlargement of Hhip+/- vs. wild-type littermate control mice (Hhip+/+) exposed to cigarette smoke (CS) or air for 6 months as demonstrated by Gill staining (A) and measured by mean alveolar chord length, MCL (B). Mean ± SEM is shown in panel B from 11 to 19 mice per group. Lung mechanics measurements revealed increased lung compliance (C) and decreased tissue elastance (D) in Hhip+/- mice exposed to CS compared to CS-exposed Hhip+/+ mice. *P <0.05 and **P <0.01. Mean ± SEM are shown in each group.
Figure 2Gene expression profiling in lungs from and control mice exposed to either room air (Air) or cigarette smoke (CS) for 6 months. (A) Venn diagram shows comparisons of differentially expressed genes in Hhip -CS vs. Hhip -Air (yellow oval), Hhip -CS vs. Hhip -CS (green oval), Hhip -Air vs. Hhip -Air (red oval) and genes enriched based on interaction with smoke treatment (blue oval). (B) Real-time PCR showed differential gene expression of Gstp1 and also of a subset of genes (C) revealed by gene-by-treatment interaction analysis. Relative gene expression levels were expressed as fold changes after normalized to Gapdh (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) as the reference gene. Mean ± SEM are shown; n = 6 mice/group. Unpaired t test. *P <0.05; **P <0.01. ***P <0.001.
Figure 3Increased lymphocyte activation in the lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke (CS). (A) Representative Hematoxylin and Eosin staining images of lymphocyte aggregates around airways in murine lungs exposed to 6 months of air or CS. (B) Quantification of the number of lymphoid aggregates per airway (mean internal diameter of 200 to 1,000 μm) in (A) +/+: Hhip mice; +/-, Hhip mice. Data are mean ± SEM from >8 mice per group. (C) Correlation of the number of lymphoid aggregates per airway (X-axis) with the airspace size (mean chord length, MCL, Y-axis) of Hhip mice exposed to CS for 6 months. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and statistical significance (p) of the correlation coefficient are shown in the figure. (D) Representative triple immunostaining for CD20, CD4, and CD8 in a lymphocyte aggregate in a lung section from a Hhip+/- mouse exposed to CS for 6 months. (E) Total leukocyte counts in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from Hhip and Hhip mice exposed to CS for 2 months. Data are means ± SEM from 10 to 11 mice per group. (F) Percentage of the CD8 + CD69+ T cells among total CD8+ T cells in lungs after enzymatic digestion from Hhip and Hhip mice exposed to CS for 2 months quantified using immunostaining and flow cytometry. Data are mean ± SEM; 3 to 6 mice per group. *P <0.05, **P <0.01.
Figure 4Network analysis applying the ‘PANDA’ method to mice vs. mice treated with either room air (Air) or cigarette smoke (CS) for 6 months. (A) Diagram to illustrate building networks using PANDA to combine transcription factor motif and physical protein interaction data with gene expression data from each group using a jack-knife subsampling method. (B) A volcano plot illustrating the selection of subnetworks by choosing high-probability edges specific to either the Hhip -CS (red) or Hhip -CS (blue) model. Red lines illustrate the thresholds used to select these edges, which were based on both the difference in average edge-weight (vertical lines) as well as P value significance (horizontal line). (C) Enriched KEGG Pathways (false discovery rate (FDR) <0.01) associated with at least one of eight distinct subnetworks, defined by four different comparisons (each column). FDR statistical significance is shown as a color with red colors representing more significant enrichment in subnetwork 1 (that is, Hhip -CS in column 3) and blue colors representing more significant enrichment in subnetwork 2 (that is, Hhip -CS in column 3). Blue stars indicate lymphocyte activation pathway.
Figure 5Transcription factors identified from Subnetworks in PANDA analysis. (A) Transcription factors (TFs) that govern subnetworks in Hhip mice and Hhip mice under CS vs. Air treatment. (B) Expression of all TFs identified from four subnetworks in murine lungs based on microarray data. Red arrows indicate top three highly expressed TFs in murine lungs that govern subnetworks in Hhip mice and Hhip mice under CS vs. Air treatment.