Terril L Verplaetse1, Andrea H Weinberger2, Philip H Smith1, Kelly P Cosgrove3, Yann S Mineur1, Marina R Picciotto1, Carolyn M Mazure1, Sherry A McKee4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Women's Health Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; 2. Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY; 3. Department of Psychiatry and Women's Health Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Women's Health Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; sherry.mckee@yale.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for both women and men in the United States, and women often experience poorer smoking cessation outcomes than men. Preliminary evidence suggests there are sex differences in medication effectiveness for smoking cessation. However, current medications do not take into account gender-sensitive treatment development and efficacy, underscoring the importance of this underdeveloped area of research. METHODS: We reviewed preclinical and clinical evidence for gender differences in the inability to quit smoking by examining (a) the effect of increased negative affect and stress reactivity on smoking outcomes in women and (b) smoking for nicotine reinforcement in men. We also reviewed the current literature targeting the noradrenergic system as a novel gender-sensitive treatment strategy for tobacco dependence. RESULTS: We hypothesize that noradrenergic agents that normalize noradrenergic activity may differentially attenuate stress reactivity in women and nicotine-related reinforcement in men, indicating that targeting the noradrenergic system for smoking cessation may be effective for both genders, with benefits operating through sex-specific mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Converging lines of preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that gender-sensitive approaches to medication development for smoking cessation are a critical next step for addressing low quit rates and exacerbated health risks among women. Evidence reviewed indicates that smoking activates different brain systems modulated by noradrenergic activity in women versus men, and noradrenergic compounds may preferentially target these gender-sensitive systems.
INTRODUCTION:Tobacco use remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for both women and men in the United States, and women often experience poorer smoking cessation outcomes than men. Preliminary evidence suggests there are sex differences in medication effectiveness for smoking cessation. However, current medications do not take into account gender-sensitive treatment development and efficacy, underscoring the importance of this underdeveloped area of research. METHODS: We reviewed preclinical and clinical evidence for gender differences in the inability to quit smoking by examining (a) the effect of increased negative affect and stress reactivity on smoking outcomes in women and (b) smoking for nicotine reinforcement in men. We also reviewed the current literature targeting the noradrenergic system as a novel gender-sensitive treatment strategy for tobacco dependence. RESULTS: We hypothesize that noradrenergic agents that normalize noradrenergic activity may differentially attenuate stress reactivity in women and nicotine-related reinforcement in men, indicating that targeting the noradrenergic system for smoking cessation may be effective for both genders, with benefits operating through sex-specific mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Converging lines of preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that gender-sensitive approaches to medication development for smoking cessation are a critical next step for addressing low quit rates and exacerbated health risks among women. Evidence reviewed indicates that smoking activates different brain systems modulated by noradrenergic activity in women versus men, and noradrenergic compounds may preferentially target these gender-sensitive systems.
Authors: Douglas E Jorenby; J Taylor Hays; Nancy A Rigotti; Salomon Azoulay; Eric J Watsky; Kathryn E Williams; Clare B Billing; Jason Gong; Karen R Reeves Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert A Philibert; Tracy D Gunter; Steven R H Beach; Gene H Brody; Anup Madan Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2008-07-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Tony P George; Jennifer C Vessicchio; Angelo Termine; Peter I Jatlow; Thomas R Kosten; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Bonnie Spring; Dorothea Howe; Mark Berendsen; H Gene McFadden; Kristin Hitchcock; Alfred W Rademaker; Brian Hitsman Journal: Addiction Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Angela M Lee; Cali A Calarco; Sherry A McKee; Yann S Mineur; Marina R Picciotto Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Terril L Verplaetse; Andrea H Weinberger; Lindsay M Oberleitner; Kathryn Mz Smith; Brian P Pittman; Julia M Shi; Jeanette M Tetrault; Meaghan E Lavery; Marina R Picciotto; Sherry A McKee Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Christi A Patten; Harry A Lando; Chris A Desnoyers; Joseph Klejka; Paul A Decker; Martha J Bock; Christine A Hughes; Lucinda Alexie; Rahnia Boyer; Kenneth Resnicow; Linda Burhansstipanov Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Elizabeth T C Lippard; Carolyn M Mazure; Jennifer A Y Johnston; Linda Spencer; Judah Weathers; Brian Pittman; Fei Wang; Hilary P Blumberg Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2017-01-02 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Yann S Mineur; Matthew P Bentham; Wen-Liang Zhou; Margreet E Plantenga; Sherry A McKee; Marina R Picciotto Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Walter Roberts; Terril L Verplaetse; Kelly E Moore; Lindsay M Oberleitner; Sherry A McKee Journal: Hum Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 1.672
Authors: Amanda K Gilmore; Constance Guille; Nathaniel L Baker; Kathleen T Brady; Christine K Hahn; Callah M Davis; Jenna L McCauley; Sudie E Back Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-01-05 Impact factor: 3.913