| Literature DB >> 25761873 |
Elizabeth Neuendorf1, Pawel Gajer2, Anne K Bowlin3, Patricia X Marques4, Bing Ma2, Hongqiu Yang1, Li Fu1, Michael S Humphrys1, Larry J Forney5, Garry S A Myers2, Patrik M Bavoil5, Roger G Rank3, Jacques Ravel6.
Abstract
In humans, the vaginal microbiota is thought to be the first line of defense again pathogens including Chlamydia trachomatis. The guinea pig has been extensively used as a model to study chlamydial infection because it shares anatomical and physiological similarities with humans, such as a squamous vaginal epithelium as well as some of the long-term outcomes caused by chlamydial infection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the guinea pig-C. caviae model of genital infection as a surrogate for studying the role of the vaginal microbiota in the early steps of C. trachomatis infection in humans. We used culture-independent molecular methods to characterize the relative and absolute abundance of bacterial phylotypes in the guinea pig vaginal microbiota in animals non-infected, mock-infected or infected by C. caviae. We showed that the guinea pig and human vaginal microbiotas are of different bacterial composition and abundance. Chlamydia caviae infection had a profound effect on the absolute abundance of bacterial phylotypes but not on the composition of the guinea pig vaginal microbiota. Our findings compromise the validity of the guinea pig-C. caviae model to study the role of the vaginal microbiota during the early steps of sexually transmitted infection. © FEMS 2015.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; Lactobacillus; microbiome; model organism; vagina
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25761873 PMCID: PMC4445005 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftv019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Dis ISSN: 2049-632X Impact factor: 3.166
Figure 1.Relative abundances of bacterial taxa in the guinea pig vaginal microbiota of C. caviae-infected (a) and non-infected (b) animals sampled every 3 days over two estrous cycles. The top 29 most abundant phylotypes are shown. ‘Others’ represents the sum of the remaining phylotypes.
Figure 2.Species evenness on days 2, 5 and 8 combined, of guinea pig vaginal microbiota in non-infected and C. caviae-infected animals in cycle 1 and 2. The red lines indicate the 95% CI. The mean of the dataset is shown as a red dot. The mean evenness of the vaginal community in C. caviae-infected animals in cycle 1 and 2 during days 2, 5 and 8 combined are significantly different.
Figure 3.Changes in estimates of absolute bacterial abundance in the guinea pig vaginal microbiota over two estrous cycles. (a) Average bacterial 16S rRNA gene counts and C. caviae ompA counts in the vaginal microbiota of guinea pigs in each group. Values were normalized to gene counts per swab. ompA counts for non-infected animals were below the detection level and were excluded. The colored shaded areas indicate the standard errors. (b) Average bacterial count for the 15 most abundant taxa found in guinea pig vaginal microbiota of C. caviae-infected and non-infected animals over two estrous cycles. The count estimates were calculated by multiplying the relative abundance obtained by 16S rRNA gene sequencing by the total 16S rRNA gene counts in the corresponding sample. Values are normalized to gene counts per swab.
Figure 4.Heatmaps showing the relative abundances vaginal bacterial taxa relative abundance in 177 guinea pig and 338 human samples. Bacterial composition and Ward linkage hierarchical clustering of (a) infected and (b) non-infected samples is shown. The top 35 most abundant bacterial taxa are shown.
Figure 5.PCoA of guinea pig vaginal and gut microbiota and human vaginal microbiota using weighted Unifrac distances. Samples are color coded by infection status (a) and collection site (b).