Literature DB >> 25761489

Decision Based on Narrow Band Imaging Cystoscopy without a Referential Normal Standard Rather Increases Unnecessary Biopsy in Detection of Recurrent Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Early after Intravesical Instillation.

Phil Hyun Song1, Seok Cho2, Young Hwii Ko1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to calculate the operating characteristics of narrowband imaging (NBI) cystoscopy versus traditional white light cystoscopy (WLC) in common clinical scenarios involving suspicion of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients initially underwent WLC and then NBI in a single session for evaluation of microscopic hematuria (group I, n=20), gross hematuria (group II, n=19), and follow-up for prior UC (group III, n=24), by an experienced urologist. All lesions that were abnormal in contrast with adjacent normal mucosa were diagnosed as positive and biopsied.
RESULTS: Sixty-six biopsies from 47 patients were performed. Pathologic examination showed 17 cases of UC from 21 sites. While the overall sensitivity of NBI was similar to that of WLC (100% vs. 94.1%), the specificity of NBI was significantly lower than that of WLC (50% vs. 86.9%, p < 0.001), particularly in group III (38.9% vs. 88.9%, p=0.004). Based on identification by NBI only, 23 additional biopsies from 18 cases were performed for identification of one patient with UC, who belonged to group III. In this group, to identify this specific patient, 15 additional biopsies were performed from 10 patients. All seven cases with positive findings from NBI within 2 months after the last intravesical therapy were histologically proven as negative.
CONCLUSION: In evaluation for recurrence early after intravesical instillation, the decision based on NBI increased unnecessary biopsy in the absence of an established standard for judging NBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystoscopy; Narrow band imaging; Urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25761489      PMCID: PMC4720086          DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1598-2998            Impact factor:   4.679


Introduction

The role of cystoscopic imaging is critical in detection and surveillance of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), including Ta/T1 urothelial carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). However, accuracy in diagnosis using standard white light cystoscopy (WLC) is unsatisfactory, leading to a high recurrence rate, mainly due to overlooked tumors [1], despite routine administration of postoperative intravesical therapy [2]. To overcome this drawback, the novel technology of narrow band imaging (NBI) [3] is rapidly gaining broad acceptance. NBI offers a significantly more accurate delineation of the tumor by enhancing the contrast between mucosal surface and microvascular structures without use of dye [4]. Since the first report on diagnosis of NMIBC in 2008 [5], a growing body of literature demonstrates improvement in detection of NMIBC without additional morbidity or cost [3,6-8]. Regarding the therapeutic advantage of NBI during transurethral resection (TUR), the majority of research notes significant additional removal, particularly for CIS [4,9], small lesions [10], or extended margin of a large tumor [7]. As it is expected that it will eventually be determined from advanced identification, short-term studies on recurrence risk of NMIBC after application of NBI showed a significant decrease compared with conventional WLC [7,10-12]. However, at the same time, there is a lack of information regarding the accuracy of the surgeon’s identification of the suspicious lesion under NBI. Given the absence of universal guidelines on visual clues for NMIBC and reported low specificity of NBI compared with WLC, a decision based on NBI may result in increased false-positives, particularly for the patient with prior intravesical instillation. In addition, considering difference in diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma based on the nature of hematuria [13,14], a risk of unnecessary biopsy in an asymptomatic patient presenting with microscopic hematuria alone was a concern deterring the routine use of blue light cystoscopy [15]. Therefore, we evaluated its accuracy and efficacy in detection of the histologically proven malignancy for all abnormal lesions detected by NBI in common clinical scenarios involving suspicion of the presence of NMIBC with different risks, including microscopic hematuria, gross hematuria, and prior history of NMIBC.

Materials and Methods

From January 2012 to December 2013, 63 consecutive patients with prior NMIBC underwent cystoscopic evaluation, mainly for the presence of NMIBC, by a single urologist with over 10 years’ experience in management of bladder tumors for evaluation of microscopic hematuria (group I, n=20), gross hematuria (group II, n=19), and tumor recurrence (group III, n=24). Enhanced abdominal-pelvic computed tomography scan and urine cytology were routinely performed before cystoscopy. In the presence of pyuria at initial urinalysis, empirical antibiotics were administered until elimination before cystoscopy evaluation. In group III, bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), Connaught strain, was administered as intravesical instillation for 6 weeks. This particular group was given further cystoscopic evaluations in our institution at 3 and 6 months after initial TUR for bladder cancer, then every 6 months up to 3 years, then annually. Cystoscopy was performed initially by WLC, then additional NBI. During cystoscopy, specimens for biopsy were taken from positive findings identified by WLC or NBI. In this series, considering reported superiority of cancer detection by NBI, particularly in sensitivity, all lesions that were abnormal in contrast with adjacent normal mucosa were defined as positive (Fig. 1). Random biopsies were performed for negative cystoscopy findings in the presence of positive cytology outcome. Histologic interpretations, including urine cytology were performed by a single uropathologist. After receiving approval from the local Institutional Review Board (YUH-14-0303-03), the collected data was analyzed to assess the accuracy of each cystoscopy modality. Diagnostic accuracy based on histologic outcome in each cystoscopy setting was assessed according to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Sensitivity and specificity were then compared using the McNemar test. Two-sided null hypotheses of no difference were rejected if p-values were less than 0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 20.0(IBM Co., Armonk, NY).
Fig. 1.

False-positive and true-positive cases using narrow band imaging (NBI) cystoscope. White light cystoscopy (WLC) (A; counted as negative) and NBI (B; counted as positive) cystoscopic finding of 64-year-old male who was priorly treated with transurethral resection of bladder for urothelial carcinoma of Ta, low grade. He finished his bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) instillation 9 weeks before cystoscopy, and histologic examination revealed chronic inflammation. WLC (C; counted as positive) and NBI (D; counted as positive) cystoscopic finding of 53-year-old male who was treated with prior transurethral resection of bladder for urothelial carcinoma of T1, low grade. He finished his last BCG instillation 8 months prior, and histologic exanimation found Ta, papillary urothelial carcinoma with low malignant potential.

Results

1. Subject characteristics

Table 1 is a detailed summary of patient demographics. In urine cytology, 16 cases were abnormal, including 10 cases with atypical or suspicious cells. During cystoscopy, 40 abnormal cases were identified, including 22 cases (55%) by WLC and 18 additional cases (45%) by NBI only. Based on the results of urine cytology and cystoscopy, 66 cystoscopy biopsies from 47 patients were performed (including 18 random biopsies from 7 patients by cytology only). Multiple biopsies were performed in 13 cases (27.6%) with more than one suspicious finding on cystoscopy. Results of pathologic examination showed 17 cases of NMIBC (26.9%; 3 cases in group I, 8 cases in group II, and 6 cases in group III) from 21 sites (31.8%). The outcomes from random biopsies based only on cytology results were negative in all cases.
Table 1.

Patient demographics

DemographicsTotal (n=63)Microscopic hematuria (n=20)Gross hematuria (n=19)Prior NMIBC (n=24)p-valuea)
Median age (IQR, yr)66 (56-76)61 (53.7-65.2)75 (67-79)65.5 (53-76.7)0.007b)
Sex
 Male39 (61.9)11 (55)14 (73.7)14 (58.3)0.438
 Female24 (38.1)9 (45)5 (26.3)10 (41.7)
Cytology outcome
 Normal47 (74.6)16 (80)11 (57.9)20 (83.3)0.348
 Atypical/suspicious10 (15.9)3 (15)5 (26.3)2 (8.3)
 Malignant cell6 (9.5)1 (5)3 (15.8)2 (8.3)
Biopsy cases
 Done47 (74.6)13 (65)15 (78.9)19 (79.2)0.490
 Not done16 (25.4)7 (35)4 (21.1)5 (20.8)
Biopsy sites
 Total number of biopsy core66172227
  Single34111013
  Multiple (over 2 cores)13256
Histology outcome (per case)
 Benign46 (73.0)17 (85.0)11 (57.9)18 (75.0)0.156
 Malignancy17 (27.0)3 (15.0)8 (42.1)6 (25.0)
Histology outcome (per biopsy)
 Benign45 (68.2)14 (82.4)12 (54.5)19 (70.4)0.172
 Malignancy21 (31.8)3 (17.6)10 (45.5)8 (29.6)
NMIBC stage
 Ta7/17 (41.2)3/3 (100)3/8 (37.5)1/6 (16.7)0.126
 T19/17 (52.9)-4/8 (50)5/6 (83.3)
 Over T21/17 (5.9)-1/8 (12.5)-0.623
NMIBC grade
 PUNLMP7/16 (43.8)2/3 (66.7)2/7 (28.6)3/6 (50)
 Low grade5/16 (31.2)1/3 (33.3)2/7 (28.6)2/6 (33.3)
 High grade4/16 (25)-3/7 (42.9)1/6 (16.7)
WLC outcome
 Normal41 (65.1)14 (70)10 (52.6)17 (70.8)0.395
 Abnormal22 (34.9)6 (30)9 (47.4)7 (29.2)
NBI outcome
 Normal23 (36.5)9 (45.0)7 (36.8)7 (29.2)0.554
 Abnormal40 (63.5)11 (55.0)12 (63.2)17 (70.8)
Abnormal findings on cystoscopy
 Total cases40111217
 Both WLC and NBI22697
 Only by WLC----
 Only by NBI185310

Values are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated. IQR, interquartile range; NMIBC, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; WLC, white light cystoscopy; NBI, narrow band imaging.

Chi-square test,

Mann-Whitney test.

2. Diagnostic accuracy based on cystoscopy modalities

A summary of results from comparison of each cystoscopy setting is in Table 2. In per-case analysis, the overall sensitivity of additional NBI (100%) was similar to that of initial WLC (94.1%, p > 0.999), and the specificity of NBI (50%) was significantly lower than that of WLC (86.9%, p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the sensitivities and specificities of NBI and WLC were similar, except in group III, which had significantly lower specificity on NBI (38.9% vs. 88.9%, p=0.004) with similar sensitivity (100% [6 cases of NMIBC] vs. 83.3% [5 cases of NMIBC], p > 0.999). In per-biopsy analysis, the overall specificity was also significantly lower in NBI than in WLC (15.6% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.001), despite similarity in sensitivity (100% [21 sites of NMIBC] vs. 90.5% [19 sites of NMIBC], p=0.500). Decreased specificity of NBI was observed only in group III (10.5% vs. 78.9%, p < 0.001).
Table 2.

Comparison by cystoscopy modality for detection of NMIBC

VariableTotalMicroscopic hematuriaGross hematuriaPrior NMIBC
WLC (per case)
 Sensitivity94.1210010083.33
 Specificity86.9682.3590.9188.89
 PPV72.735088.8971.43
 NPV97.5610010094.12
 Accuracy88.898594.7487.5
NBI (per case)
 Sensitivity100100100100
 Specificity50***52.9463.6438.89**
 PPV42.5027.2766.6735.29
 NPV100100100100
 Accuracy63.496078.9554.17
WLC (per biopsy)
 Sensitivity90.4810010075
 Specificity62.22505078.95
 PPV52.783062.5060
 NPV93.3310010088.24
 Accuracy71.2158.8272.7377.78
NBI (per biopsy)
 Sensitivity100100100100
 Specificity15.56***14.292510.53***
 PPV35.592052.6332
 NPV100100100100
 Accuracy42.4229.4159.0937.04

Values are presented as percentage. NMIBC, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer; WLC, white light cystoscopy; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; NBI, narrow band imaging.

p < 0.01, in comparison with WLC,

p < 0.001, in comparison with WLC.

3. Diagnostic efficacy of NBI cystoscopy in patients with prior intravesical instillation

As a whole, based on identification by NBI only, 23 additional biopsies from 18 cases (5 cases in group I, 3 cases in group II, and 10 cases in group III) were performed for identification of one additional patient with NMIBC, who belonged to group III. In this particular group, to identify this specific patient, 15 additional biopsies were performed from 10 patients based on positive NBI findings (Table 3).
Table 3.

Histologic outcome and cystoscopy modality in detection of NMIBC

Pathologic outcomeWLCNBI
Total (n=63)
Microscopic hematuria (n=20)
Gross hematuria (n=19)
Prior NMIBC (n=24)
AbnormalNormalAbnormalNormalAbnormalNormalAbnormalNormal
Per personMalignancyAbnormal1603-8-50
Normal10----10
BenignAbnormal60301020
Normal1723593797
Per biopsyMalignancyAbnormal1903-10-60
Normal20----20
BenignAbnormal170706040
Normal2175233132

NMIBC, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer; WLC, white light cystoscopy; NBI, narrow band imaging.

In group III, all patients had undergone prior intravesical instillation treatment with a median interval of 23 weeks (range, 4 to 420 weeks) from cystoscopy. None of the enrolled patients received maintenance BCG treatment over a year. In six patients with pathologically proven NMIBC, the interval from the last BCG instillation was similar (median, 24 weeks; range, 13 to 52 weeks; p=0.537). However, this interval was significantly shorter in cases with positive NBI findings than in those with negative NBI findings (median, 11.5 weeks vs. 51 weeks; p < 0.015). All seven patients who were NBI positive within 2 months after the last intravesical therapy were histologically proven as negative (Table 4).
Table 4.

Interval from the last intravesical instillation by cystoscopy

Interval from the last intravesical instillation (mo)No. of casesPositive at WLCPositive at NBICase proven malignancy
1414-
2313-
32111
4-63232
7-127232
> 125-31
Total247176

WLC, white light cystoscopy; NBI, narrow band imaging.

Discussion

The ideal endoscopic imaging modality should be highly sensitive for cancer detection, maintaining the ability to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions [16]. NBI cystoscopy is a plausible candidate, aimed at improving the detection of bladder tumors based solely on an optic technological advancement [9]. In short, NBI light is absorbed strongly by hemoglobin and penetrates only superficial layers of the tissue [6], highlighting the superficial and underlying vasculature [4]. Thereby, NBI improves visualization of tumors by enhancing the contrast between vascularized lesions and normal mucosa [10,16,17]. As positive evidence accumulates from early trials, particularly for advanced detection, enthusiasm regarding NBI is increasing. The missed-detection rate by conventional WLC is high, ranging from 10% to 20% [18]. In contrast, NBI allows more thorough primary tumor resection and reduces the number of missed tumors. In a recently updated meta-analysis for biopsy level analysis based on evidence from four studies of 1,195 lesions, the pooled sensitivity of NBI was 0.949; for WLC, it was only 0.751 (the pooled specificity was 0.548 in NBI; 0.719 in WLC) [3]. In addition, TUR performed using the NBI modality reduces the risk of recurrence of NMIBC by at least 10% at 1 year [12]. Several short-term randomized prospective studies demonstrated that NBI-assisted TUR could result in significant reduction of the residual tumor and recurrence rate [7,12]. In an effort to obtain more solid evidence, a large international randomized controlled trial is underway [19]. In comparison with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and hexaminolevulinate (HAM) cystoscopy, highly recommended for evaluation of NMIBC in contemporary guidelines [2], NBI has both economic and practical advantages, in that no preoperative preparation, including intravesical instillation, is required. Nevertheless, because NBI is not cancer specific but only provides the morphologic aspect of suspicious lesions, the increased sensitivity and decreased specificity unfortunately results in increased false positives [20]. High false-positive rates may, in turn, lead to a substantial amount of unnecessary biopsy or resection on bladder tissue. In a prospective controlled trial conducted by Tatsugami et al. [4], among 161 abnormal sites from 104 consecutive patients with definite or suspected bladder cancer, 91 sites were identified by both NBI and WLC, while 70 sites were identified by NBI only. However, after histologic examination, only 55.7% (39/70) were malignant while 36.6% (59 sites) were proven false positive by NBI. Specificity for each modality was 70.9% for NBI and 86.2% for WLC. Similarly, Cauberg et al. [10] reported higher false-positivity of NBI (31.6%), compared with WLC (24.5%, p < 0.001), in 95 consecutive patients who were suspicious for bladder cancer. Four recent studies also reported a higher number of false-positives of 245 by NBI, in contrast to 115 by WLC [8]. These concerns for lower specificity and higher false positivity were reinforced in our series. In both per-case and per-site analysis, significantly lower overall specificity was observed for NBI compared with WLC and among 40 abnormalities identified by NBI, only 17 cases were proven malignant. Although NBI revealed 23 additional positive findings from 18 cases, only two additional NMIBC were found, in one patient. What is the cause of this phenomenon? One likely explanation is that many patients with recurrent disease had prior intravesical instillation, which causes erythematous change of the mucosa, raising the likelihood of a false-positive with NBI [21]. In a single center prospective study on 95 consecutive patients with suspicion of NMIBC, Cauberg et al. [10] reported that the false-positive rate in NBI was significantly higher (43.5% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001) in cases with prior intravesical instillation, although this difference was not observed in WLC (34.5% vs. 19.0%, p=0.071). In a series on 50 patients conducted by four urologists with different experience, one experienced urologist considered more lesions positive for tumor than other urologists [22]. Therefore, individual specificity showed a wide range of 79 to 58 mainly because of prior BCG instillation. In our series, all patients in the follow-up group underwent prior BCG instillation, and it is noteworthy that the interval of cystoscopy from the last intravesical instillation was significantly shorter in cases with positive NBI findings. In all positive findings from NBI within 2 months after intravesical therapy, no malignancy was detected in histologic examination. In an effort to avoid the complexity induced by the post-BCG setting, some studies using photodynamic imaging included only a few patients treated with BCG, or excluded them altogether [23-25]. Currently, diagnosis by 5-ALA or HAM on NMIBC is not recommended within 3 months of BCG treatment. Nevertheless, contemporary guidelines emphasize the importance of maintenance BCG [2], which in turn particularly hinders the accuracy of NBI. The authors well recognize the innate limitations of this study. First, because the decision on the biopsy was made by a single physician, other physicians might make a different judgment on the same lesions. In addition, because WLC was performed prior to NBI for the same patient, positive findings on WLC had an identical result in NBI cystoscopy, given the higher sensitivity of NBI. Second, while we focused on these three clinical scenarios requiring careful examination of the urinary tract, including cystoscopy for evaluation of the advantage of additional NBI over conventional WLC images, the risk of NMIBC may not be the same in each clinical group, requiring more cases, particularly for groups I and II. Third, although random biopsy was usually advised in the absence of definite cystoscopic findings concomitant with positive cytology, lower sensitivity in this clinical setting may decrease the efficacy of cystoscopy. All seven patients in this series had normal histologic findings. Finally, because there is no established criterion for diagnosing a positive lesion based upon NBI findings, we biopsied every abnormal lesion detected by NBI regardless of prior BCG. This policy may elevate the false-positive results, leading to decreased specificity. We believe that our results do not dissuade the urologist from performing NBI, because additional biopsy can be justified by the increased detection of NMIBC. Until agreement is reached on the judging standard of the image obtained by NBI, to avoid unnecessary biopsy we suggest that urologists keep in mind that not all abnormal lesions identified by NBI are malignant, particularly in the early period after intravesical BCG therapy. The outcome of ongoing trials may provide guidance for this practical question.

Conclusion

Despite a slight increase in additional detection, the specificity of NBI cystoscopy in identification of bladder urothelial carcinoma was significantly lower than that from conventional WLC. Particularly in evaluation for recurrence early after prior intravesical instillation using BCG, the decision based on NBI increased the use of unnecessary biopsy in the absence of an established standard for judging NBI findings.
  25 in total

1.  Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Gono; Takashi Obi; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Nagaaki Ohyama; Hirohisa Machida; Yasushi Sano; Shigeaki Yoshida; Yasuo Hamamoto; Takao Endo
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Global randomized narrow band imaging versus white light study in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: accession to the first milestone-enrollment of 600 patients.

Authors:  Seiji Naito; Sonja van Rees Vellinga; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Comparison of bladder cancer outcome in men undergoing hematuria home screening versus those with standard clinical presentations.

Authors:  E M Messing; T B Young; V B Hunt; K W Gilchrist; M A Newton; L L Bram; W J Hisgen; E B Greenberg; M E Kuglitsch; J D Wegenke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Fluorescence cystoscopy in the management of bladder cancer: a help for the urologist!

Authors:  Patrice Jichlinski; Hans-Jurg Leisinger
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Hematuria: etiology and evaluation for the primary care physician.

Authors:  Jitesh V Patel; Christopher V Chambers; Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.344

6.  Narrow-band imaging flexible cystoscopy in the detection of recurrent urothelial cancer of the bladder.

Authors:  Richard T Bryan; Lucinda J Billingham; D Michael A Wallace
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Narrow band imaging diagnosis of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changjian Zheng; Yalan Lv; Qiang Zhong; Runhua Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Diagnosis of narrow-band imaging in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaiwen Li; Tianxin Lin; Xinxiang Fan; Yu Duan; Jian Huang
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  A comparison of white-light cystoscopy and narrow-band imaging cystoscopy to detect bladder tumour recurrences.

Authors:  Harry W Herr; S Machele Donat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  NBI cystoscopy and bipolar electrosurgery in NMIBC management - An overview of daily practice.

Authors:  B Geavlete; F Stănescu; C Moldoveanu; M Jecu; L Adou; C Bulai; C Ene; P Geavlete
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2013-06-25
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Narrow band imaging-assisted transurethral resection reduces the recurrence risk of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiting Kang; Zilian Cui; Qianqian Chen; Dong Zhang; Haiyang Zhang; Xunbo Jin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

2.  A meta-analysis of narrow band imaging for the diagnosis and therapeutic outcome of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  YiQuan Xiong; JianDong Li; ShuJuan Ma; Jing Ge; LiZhi Zhou; Dongliang Li; Qing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Detection and recurrence rate of transurethral resection of bladder tumors by narrow-band imaging: Prospective, randomized comparison with white light cystoscopy.

Authors:  Seung Bin Kim; Sung Goo Yoon; Jonghyun Tae; Jae Yoon Kim; Ji Sung Shim; Sung Gu Kang; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Seok Ho Kang
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-02-08

4.  Usefulness of narrow-band imaging in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Early experience from a tertiary center in India.

Authors:  Kanuj Malik; Anand Raja; Sivakumar Mahalingam; L S Ravishankar
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  Role of Macroscopic Image Enhancement in Diagnosis of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Analytical Review.

Authors:  Prashant Motiram Mulawkar; Gyanendra Sharma; Ashwin Tamhankar; Utsav Shah; Rickaz Raheem
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 6.  Narrow band imaging for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Y Hsueh; Allen W Chiu
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-05-26

7.  Diagnostic performance of image technique based transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changhao Chen; Hao Huang; Yue Zhao; Hao Liu; Richard Sylvester; Tianxin Lin; Jian Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.