Literature DB >> 7879333

Comparison of bladder cancer outcome in men undergoing hematuria home screening versus those with standard clinical presentations.

E M Messing1, T B Young, V B Hunt, K W Gilchrist, M A Newton, L L Bram, W J Hisgen, E B Greenberg, M E Kuglitsch, J D Wegenke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Because repetitive hematuria home screening with a chemical reagent strip can detect early stage bladder cancer (BC) in asymptomatic middle-aged and elderly men, the ability of this screening to effect earlier detection and reduce BC mortality was investigated.
METHODS: Grades, stages, and outcomes of BCs detected by hematuria screening in 1575 men were compared with those of all newly diagnosed BCs in men age 50 years or older reported to the Wisconsin cancer registry in 1988. BC grades and stages were assigned by review of all pathology slides/blocks, and causes of deaths were determined from cancer registry records. As an additional control group, outcomes of BC cases diagnosed in men solicited to take part in screening, who declined, were also determined.
RESULTS: The proportions of low-grade (grades 1 and 2) superficial (Stages Ta and T1) versus high-grade (grade 3) or invasive (Stage T2 or higher) cancers in cases detected by hematuria screening (screened cases) and those reported to the tumor registry (unscreened cases) were not significantly different (52.4% versus 47.7% in 21 screened and 56.8% versus 43.3% in 511 unscreened cases) (P > 0.20). Of the high-grade or invasive cases, however, the proportion of late stage (T2 or higher) tumors was significantly lower in the screening-detected BCs compared to unscreened ones (P = 0.007). No screened case has died of BC (3- to 9-year follow-up), whereas 16.4% of unscreened cases have within 2 years of diagnosis (P = 0.025). Twenty-three of 1940 (1.2%) men who were solicited but chose not to participate in screening were diagnosed with BC within 18 months after what would have been their last home screening date, compared with 1.3% of participants having BC detected by screening. Thus, screening participants and those who were solicited and declined had similar likelihoods of developing BC.
CONCLUSIONS: Hematuria home screening detects high-grade cancers before they become muscle invading and significantly reduces BC mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7879333     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  41 in total

Review 1.  Time to abandon testing for microscopic haematuria in adults?

Authors:  Per-Uno Malmström
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

Review 2.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2.

Authors:  W S Smellie; J O Forth; C A M McNulty; L Hirschowitz; D Lilic; R Gosling; D Bareford; E Logan; K G Kerr; G P Spickett; J Hoffman; A Galloway; C A Bloxham
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Chemoprevention of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dragan J Golijanin; David Kakiashvili; Ralph R Madeb; Edward M Messing; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Is there a rationale for bladder cancer screening?

Authors:  Robert S Svatek; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  A Festschrift in Honor of Edward M. Messing, MD, FACS.

Authors:  Jean V Joseph; Ralph Brasacchio; Chunkit Fung; Jay Reeder; Kevin Bylund; Deepak Sahasrabudhe; Shu Yuan Yeh; Ahmed Ghazi; Patrick Fultz; Deborah Rubens; Guan Wu; Eric Singer; Edward Schwarz; Supriya Mohile; James Mohler; Dan Theodorescu; Yi Fen Lee; Paul Okunieff; David McConkey; Hani Rashid; Chawnshang Chang; Yves Fradet; Khurshid Guru; Janet Kukreja; Gerald Sufrin; Yair Lotan; Howard Bailey; Katia Noyes; Seymour Schwartz; Kathy Rideout; Gennady Bratslavsky; Steven C Campbell; Ithaar Derweesh; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Mark Soloway; Leonard Gomella; Dragan Golijanin; Robert Svatek; Thomas Frye; Seth Lerner; Ganesh Palapattu; George Wilding; Michael Droller; Donald Trump
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2018-10-03

6.  Who should be included in a clinical trial of screening for bladder cancer?: a decision analysis of data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline Bennette; Adam S Kibel; Amanda Black; Grant Izmirlian; Andrew J Stephenson; Bernard Bochner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Using urine microscopy and cytology for early detection of bladder cancer in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Eddie S Y Chan; Chi-Fai Ng; See-Ming Hou; Sidney K H Yip
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Screening for bladder cancer: the best opportunity to reduce mortality.

Authors:  Yves Fradet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Molecular markers in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: New insights into mechanisms and prognosis.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01

10.  Impact of age and gender on the clinicopathological characteristics of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Parag Gupta; Manoj Jain; Rakesh Kapoor; K Muruganandham; Aneesh Srivastava; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.