PURPOSE: The present simulation study was initiated to develop a limited sampling strategy and pharmacokinetically based dosing algorithm of weekly paclitaxel based on pharmacokinetic (PK) and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) data from a large database. METHODS: We used paclitaxel plasma concentrations from 200 patients with solid tumors receiving weekly paclitaxel infusions to build a population PK model and a proportional odds model on CIPN. Different limited sampling strategies were tested on their accuracy to estimate the individual paclitaxel time-above-threshold-concentration of 0.05 µmol/L (T c>0.05µM), which is a common threshold for paclitaxel. A dosing algorithm was developed based on the population distribution of paclitaxel T c>0.05µM and the correlation between paclitaxel T c>0.05µM and CIPN. A trial simulation based on paclitaxel PK and CIPN was performed using empirical Bayes estimations, applying the proposed dosing algorithm and a single 24-h paclitaxel PK sample. RESULTS: A single paclitaxel plasma concentration taken 18-30 h after the start of chemotherapy infusion adequately predicted T c>0.05µM. By using an empirical dosing algorithm to target an average paclitaxel T c>0.05µM between 10 and 14 h, Bayesian simulations of repetitive (adapted) dosing suggested a potential reduction of grade 2 CIPN from 9.6 to 4.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study proposes a pharmacokinetically based dosing algorithm for weekly paclitaxel and shows potential improvement of the benefit/risk ratio by using empirical Bayesian models.
PURPOSE: The present simulation study was initiated to develop a limited sampling strategy and pharmacokinetically based dosing algorithm of weekly paclitaxel based on pharmacokinetic (PK) and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) data from a large database. METHODS: We used paclitaxel plasma concentrations from 200 patients with solid tumors receiving weekly paclitaxel infusions to build a population PK model and a proportional odds model on CIPN. Different limited sampling strategies were tested on their accuracy to estimate the individual paclitaxel time-above-threshold-concentration of 0.05 µmol/L (T c>0.05µM), which is a common threshold for paclitaxel. A dosing algorithm was developed based on the population distribution of paclitaxel T c>0.05µM and the correlation between paclitaxel T c>0.05µM and CIPN. A trial simulation based on paclitaxel PK and CIPN was performed using empirical Bayes estimations, applying the proposed dosing algorithm and a single 24-h paclitaxel PK sample. RESULTS: A single paclitaxel plasma concentration taken 18-30 h after the start of chemotherapy infusion adequately predicted T c>0.05µM. By using an empirical dosing algorithm to target an average paclitaxel T c>0.05µM between 10 and 14 h, Bayesian simulations of repetitive (adapted) dosing suggested a potential reduction of grade 2 CIPN from 9.6 to 4.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study proposes a pharmacokinetically based dosing algorithm for weekly paclitaxel and shows potential improvement of the benefit/risk ratio by using empirical Bayesian models.
Authors: Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Stijn L W Koolen; Sophie Wijngaard; Markus Joerger; Thomas P C Dorlo; Nielka P van Erp; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Kelley M Kidwell; Kiran Vangipuram; Feng Li; Manjunath P Pai; Monika Burness; Jennifer J Griggs; Anne F Schott; Catherine Van Poznak; Daniel F Hayes; Ellen M Lavoie Smith; N Lynn Henry Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Manish R Sharma; Shailly Mehrotra; Elizabeth Gray; Kehua Wu; William T Barry; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; Alan P Lyss; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Thomas E Lad; Mario Velasco; Beth Overmoyer; Hope S Rugo; Mark J Ratain; Jogarao V Gobburu Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Lauren A Marcath; Kelley M Kidwell; Adam C Robinson; Kiran Vangipuram; Monika L Burness; Jennifer J Griggs; Catherine Van Poznak; Anne F Schott; Daniel F Hayes; Norah Lynn Henry; Daniel L Hertz Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Leni van Doorn; Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Hánah N Rier; Jeroen L A van Vugt; Charlotte van Kesteren; Sander Bins; Ron H J Mathijssen; Mark-David Levin; Stijn L W Koolen Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2021-01-09