Literature DB >> 35922567

Paclitaxel exposure-toxicity analysis reveals a pharmacokinetic determinant for dose-limiting neutropenia in East-Asian solid tumor patients: results from two prospective, phase II studies.

Jinhui Xue1, Haipeng He2, Zuan Lin1, Yuehan Wu1, Yuehao Lin3, Hongyun Zhao1, Salvatore J Salamone4, Yan Huang5, Yunpeng Yang5, Wenfeng Fang5, Yang Zhang1, Shaodong Hong5, Yuxiang Ma6, Li Zhang7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The time of a paclitaxel (PTX) concentration remains above 0.05 μM (Tc > 0.05) has been associated with PTX-induced adverse effects in Caucasians, while limited studies were reported in Asians. This study was aimed to explore the characteristics of Tc > 0.05 and the relationship between PTX exposure and toxicity in East-Asian patients.
METHODS: This study was based on two prospective phase II clinical trials and patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were naïve to PTX were included independently. Eligible patients receive PTX (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5) treatment every 3 weeks. PTX pharmacokinetic analysis was accessed. The relationship between PTX exposure and toxicities after first cycle as well as clinical efficacy was evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 93 NPC and 40 NSCLC patients were enrolled. PTX exposure was consistent in two trials with average Tc > 0.05 duration of 38.8 h and 38.4 h, respectively. Average Tc > 0.05 in patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly higher than those without severe neutropenia in NPC patients (P = 0.003) and NSCLC patients (P = 0.007). Cut-off value of Tc > 0.05 were identified from the NPC cohort and then verified in the NSCLC cohort, dividing patients into high exposure Tc > 0.05 group (> 39 h) and low exposure group (≤ 39 h). Incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia were significantly higher in the high exposure group in NPC cohort (43.3% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001) and NSCLC cohort (42.1% vs 9.5%, P = 0.028). No significant relationship between Tc > 0.05 and efficacy were observed.
CONCLUSION: Patients with PTX Tc > 0.05 duration above 39 h experience more severe neutropenia than those under 39 h. Prospective studies are needed to verify this threshold.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neutropenia; Paclitaxel; Pharmacokinetics; Tc > 0.05; Therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35922567     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-022-04456-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.288


  42 in total

1.  Paclitaxel and gemcitabine vs. paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in advanced non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer. An efficacy and cost analysis randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  G Fountzilas; P Papakostas; U Dafni; T Makatsoris; M Karina; A Kalogera-Fountzila; N Maniadakis; G Aravantinos; K Syrigos; A Bamias; C Christodoulou; T Economopoulos; Hp Kalofonos; A Nikolaou; N Angouridakis; G Stathopoulos; D Bafaloukos; N Pavlidis; J Daniilidis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol.

Authors:  Chandra P Belani; Hak Choy; Phil Bonomi; Charles Scott; Patrick Travis; John Haluschak; Walter J Curran
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Alan Sandler; Robert Gray; Michael C Perry; Julie Brahmer; Joan H Schiller; Afshin Dowlati; Rogerio Lilenbaum; David H Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel.

Authors:  A Henningsson; M O Karlsson; L Viganò; L Gianni; J Verweij; A Sparreboom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Paclitaxel: a review of adverse toxicities and novel delivery strategies.

Authors:  Neena I Marupudi; James E Han; Khan W Li; Violette M Renard; Betty M Tyler; Henry Brem
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.250

6.  Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Robert F Ozols; Brian N Bundy; Benjamin E Greer; Jeffrey M Fowler; Daniel Clarke-Pearson; Robert A Burger; Robert S Mannel; Koen DeGeest; Ellen M Hartenbach; Rebecca Baergen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-14       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599.

Authors:  Suresh S Ramalingam; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Corey J Langer; Robert Gray; Chandra P Belani; Julie R Brahmer; Alan B Sandler; Joan H Schiller; David H Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathy Miller; Molin Wang; Julie Gralow; Maura Dickler; Melody Cobleigh; Edith A Perez; Tamara Shenkier; David Cella; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells.

Authors:  Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Mortality and admission to intensive care units after febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Theis Aagaard; Joanne Reekie; Mette Jørgensen; Ashley Roen; Gedske Daugaard; Lena Specht; Henrik Sengeløv; Amanda Mocroft; Jens Lundgren; Marie Helleberg
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.