| Literature DB >> 25760072 |
Sang Yun Ha1, So-Jung Choi2, Jong Ho Cho3, Hye Joo Choi2, Jinseon Lee2, Kyungsoo Jung4, Darry Irwin5, Xiao Liu6,7, Maruja E Lira8, Mao Mao9, Hong Kwan Kim3, Yong Soo Choi3, Young Mog Shim3, Woong Yang Park10, Yoon-La Choi1,4,10, Jhingook Kim2,3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of known oncogenic driver mutations in female never-smoker Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma. We analyzed 214 mutations across 26 lung cancer-associated genes and three fusion genes using the MassARRAY LungCarta Panel and the ALK, ROS1, and RET fusion assays in 198 consecutively resected lung adenocarcinomas from never-smoker females at a single institution. EGFR mutation, which was the most frequent driver gene mutation, was detected in 124 (63%) cases. Mutation of ALK, KRAS, PIK3CA, ERBB2, BRAF, ROS1, and RET genesoccurred in 7%, 4%, 2.5%, 1.5%, 1%, 1%, and 1% of cases, respectively. Thus, 79% of lung adenocarcinomas from never-smoker females harbored well-known oncogenic mutations. Mucinous adenocarcinomas tended to have a lower frequency of known driver gene mutations than other histologic subtypes. EGFR mutation was associated with older age and a predominantly acinar pattern, while ALK rearrangement was associated with younger age and a predominantly solid pattern. Lung cancer in never-smoker Asian females is a distinct entity, with the majority of these cancers developing from oncogenic mutations.Entities:
Keywords: EGFR; adenocarcinoma; driver mutation; never-smoker female; non-small cell lung cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25760072 PMCID: PMC4467161 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Patient population
| Characteristics | Number of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Age, years | median 60 (range, 29–81) |
| Histologic classification | |
| Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma | 2 (1.0) |
| Invasive adenocarcinoma | |
| Lepidic predominant | 9 (4.5) |
| Acinar predominant | 142 (71.7) |
| Papillary predominant | 18 (9.1) |
| Micropapillary predominant | 1 (0.5) |
| Solid predominant | 17 (8.6) |
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 9 (4.5) |
| T stage | |
| 1 | 104 (52.5) |
| 2 | 83 (41.9) |
| 3 | 11 (5.6) |
| N stage | |
| 0 | 124 (65.6) |
| 1 | 25 (13.2) |
| 2 | 40 (21.2) |
| M stage | |
| 0 | 196 (99.0) |
| 1 | 2 (1.0) |
| Operation | |
| Wedge resection | 16 (8.0) |
| Lobectomy | 169 (85.3) |
| Lobectomy + α | 13 (6.6) |
| Neoadjuvant CCRT | |
| Yes | 11 (5.6) |
| No | 187 (94.4) |
Nine cases were excluded because lymph node dissection was not performed.
α includes lobectomy with wedge resection of the other lobe, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy.
CCRT indicates concurrent chemoradiation therapy.
Figure 2Frequency of driver gene mutations in lung adenocarcinomas from East Asian never-smoker females
Relationship between driver mutation status and histologic subclassification of adenocarcinoma according to predominant type
| Total | Lepidic | Acinar | Papillary | Micropapillary | Solid | Mucinous | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 (20.7) | 3 (7.3) | 29 (70.7) | 2 (4.9) | 0 (0) | 3 (7.3) | 4 (9.8) | 0.446 Mucinous vs. others: 0.090 | |
| 157 (79.3) | 8 (5.1) | 113 (72.0) | 16 (10.2) | 1 (0.6) | 14 (8.9) | 5 (3.2) | ||
| 124 (62.6) | 7 (5.6) | 102 (82.3) | 9 (7.3) | 1 (0.8) | 5 (4.0) | 0 (0) | < 0.001 | |
| 14 (7.1) | 0 (0) | 6 (42.9) | 2 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (35.7) | 1 (7.1) | 0.012 | |
| 8 (4.0) | 1 (12.5) | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (25.0) | 4 (50.0) | < 0.001 | |
| 5 (2.5) | 0 (0) | 3 (60.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (20.0) | 0.31 | |
| 4 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 4 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | |
| 3 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (33.3) | 0.272 | |
| 2 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.043 | |
| 2 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0) | 0.086 | |
| 2 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.487 | |
| 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 0.192 |
Two cases of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma were included in the lepidic predominant type.
Six cases with acinar pattern showed concurrent mutation of EGFR/PIK3CA (n = 3), EGFR/TP53 (n = 1), and ALK/TP53 (n = 2).
Two cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma showed concurrent mutation of KRAS/PIK3CA (n = 1) and KRAS/ERBB2 (n = 1).
Figure 3Diagram demonstrating driver gene mutation status and clinicopathologic features in 198 adenocarcinomas from East Asian never-smoker females
Most mutations were mutually exclusive with the rare exception of concurrent mutation of EGFR/PIK3CA (n = 3), EGFR/TP53 (n = 1), ALK/TP53 (n = 2), KRAS/PIK3CA (n = 1), and KRAS/ERBB2 (n = 1). Patients who received concurrent chemoradiation therapy and those who did not undergo lymph node dissection were excluded in the analysis of TNM stage.
Figure 4Frequency of driver gene mutations according to predominant histologic subtype
(A) Lepidic, (B) Acinar, (C) Papillary, (D) Solid, (E) Mucinous subtype. In acinar subtype, four cases with concurrent mutations of EGFR/PIK3CA (n = 3) and EGFR/TP53 (n = 1) are represented as an EGFR mutation, and 2 cases of ALK/TP53 mutation as an ALK mutation. In mucinous subtype, two cases with concurrent mutations of KRAS/PIK3CA and KRAS/ERBB2 are represented as a KRAS mutation.
Figure 1Process of patient (female never smoker with lung adenocarcinoma) selection in this study
(A) Distribution of lung cancer according to histology subtype. (B) Distribution of lung adenocarcinoma according to gender. (C) Distribution of lung adenocarcinoma from female according to smoking status. Patients with no medical record of smoking status were excluded. The record of year 2012 was not shown due to lack of smoking information.