Literature DB >> 25758378

Higher Preoperative Patient Activation Associated With Better Patient-reported Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

John Andrawis1, Sina Akhavan, Vanessa Chan, Mandeep Lehil, Dana Pong, Kevin J Bozic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite widely reported success associated with hip and knee replacements, some patients remain dissatisfied with their outcomes. Patient activation, an individual's propensity to engage in adaptive health behaviors, has been measured as a potentially important factor contributing to health outcomes, cost, and patient experience of care. However, to our knowledge, it has not been studied in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wanted to determine whether patients with higher activation scores would experience (1) greater resolution of pain and improved activity, (2) greater improvements in postoperative physical and mental health, and (3) greater patient satisfaction after primary THA or TKA.
METHODS: We approached 174 patients and enrolled 135 who were undergoing primary THA or TKA at one of two hospitals between January 2013 and May 2014. Patient Activation Measure (PAM) scores were obtained preoperatively and patient-reported outcomes were assessed and completed for 125 patients pre- and postoperatively at the 6- or 12-month visit. We assessed pain and activity with the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores. We measured physical and mental health by calculating SF12v2® scores and measured patient satisfaction with the Hip and Knee Satisfaction Scale (HKSS). Linear regression models were used to test the association between baseline PAM and postoperative patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS: Overall, patients with a higher baseline PAM score experienced better pain relief using the HOOS/KOOS pain scores (R2=0.311, p=0.048) and symptoms using the HOOS/KOOS symptom scores (R2=0.272, p=0.021). In addition, higher PAM scores were associated with better postoperative mental health using the SF12v2® (R2=0.057, p<0.001), but were not associated with higher physical health (R2=0.176, p=0.173). Finally, higher PAM scores were associated with having greater postoperative satisfaction after surgery using the HKSS questionnaire (R2=0.048, p=0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher preoperative patient activation was associated with better pain relief, decreased symptoms, improved mental health, and greater satisfaction after TJA. Future efforts should be aimed at studying if improving patient activation before surgery results in better patient-reported outcomes after elective THA or TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25758378      PMCID: PMC4488208          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4247-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

1.  Patient activation and functional recovery in persons undergoing spine surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Ellen J Mackenzie; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  C B Terwee; W Bouwmeester; S L van Elsland; H C W de Vet; J Dekker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: A cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  P N Baker; S Rushton; S S Jameson; M Reed; P Gregg; D J Deehan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Utility of the Charlson comorbidity index computed from routinely collected hospital discharge diagnosis codes.

Authors:  R L O'Connell; L L Lim
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R John Wright; Clement B Sledge; Robert Poss; Frederick C Ewald; Maureen E Walsh; Elizabeth A Lingard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients.

Authors:  C E H Scott; C R Howie; D MacDonald; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

Review 8.  Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pasqualina L Santaguida; Gillian A Hawker; Pamela L Hudak; Richard Glazier; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; Peter C Coyte; James G Wright
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  22 in total

1.  Value-based Healthcare: The Value of Considering Patient Preferences and Circumstances in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  David Ring; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: Feedback to Patients About Patient-reported Outcomes Does Not Improve Empowerment or Satisfaction.

Authors:  Teun Teunis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: Higher Preoperative Patient Activation Associated With Better Patient-reported Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CORR Insights®: Can the QuickDASH PROM be Altered by First Completing the Tasks on the Instrument?

Authors:  Tom J Crijns
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Patients With Limited Health Literacy Ask Fewer Questions During Office Visits With Hand Surgeons.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Are Associated With Disability After Upper Extremity Injuries? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John P Andrawis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Value-based Healthcare: Patient-reported Outcomes in Clinical Decision Making.

Authors:  Judith F Baumhauer; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The psychology of chronic post-surgical pain: new frontiers in risk factor identification, prevention and management.

Authors:  Aliza Z Weinrib; Muhammad A Azam; Kathryn A Birnie; Lindsay C Burns; Hance Clarke; Joel Katz
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2017-07-12

9.  CORR Insights®: What are the Implications of Excessive Internet Searches for Medical Information by Orthopaedic Patients?

Authors:  Tom J Crijns
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Increased Patient Activation Is Associated with Fewer Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations for Pain in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Robert M Cronin; Tim Lucas Dorner; Amol Utrankar; Whitney Allen; Mark Rodeghier; Adetola A Kassim; Gretchen Purcell Jackson; Michael R DeBaun
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.