Literature DB >> 24078532

Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: A cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

P N Baker1, S Rushton, S S Jameson, M Reed, P Gregg, D J Deehan.   

Abstract

Pre-operative variables are increasingly being used to determine eligibility for total knee replacement (TKR). This study was undertaken to evaluate the relationships, interactions and predictive capacity of variables available pre- and post-operatively on patient satisfaction following TKR. Using nationally collected patient reported outcome measures and data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales, we identified 22 798 patients who underwent TKR for osteoarthritis between August 2008 and September 2010. The ability of specific covariates to predict satisfaction was assessed using ordinal logistic regression and structural equational modelling. Only 4959 (22%) of 22 278 patients rated the results of their TKR as 'excellent', despite the majority (71%, n = 15 882) perceiving their knee symptoms to be much improved. The strongest predictors of satisfaction were post-operative variables. Satisfaction was significantly and positively related to the perception of symptom improvement (operative success) and the post-operative EuroQol-5D score. While also significant within the models pre-operative variables were less important and had a minimal influence upon post-operative satisfaction. The most robust predictions of satisfaction occurred only when both pre- and post-operative variables were considered together. These findings question the appropriateness of restricting access to care based on arbitrary pre-operative thresholds as these factors have little bearing on post-operative satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient reported outcome measures; Registry; Satisfaction; Success; Total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078532     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.32281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  32 in total

1.  Tibiofemoral forces for the native and post-arthroplasty knee: relationship to maximal laxity through a functional arc of motion.

Authors:  William A Manning; Kanishka Ghosh; Alasdair Blain; Lee Longstaff; David John Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Higher physical activity and lower pain levels before surgery predict non-improvement of knee pain 1 year after TKA.

Authors:  Nikolai Kornilov; Maren Falch Lindberg; Caryl Gay; Alexander Saraev; Taras Kuliaba; Leiv Arne Rosseland; Anners Lerdal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Higher Preoperative Patient Activation Associated With Better Patient-reported Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Andrawis; Sina Akhavan; Vanessa Chan; Mandeep Lehil; Dana Pong; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Mark Alan Fontana; Stephen Lyman; Gourab K Sarker; Douglas E Padgett; Catherine H MacLean
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What do patients want out of their Total Knee Arthroplasty?: An Indian perspective.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe; Ravi Vinod Shah; Amit Pankaj Doshi; Tejas Upasani; Nicholas Antao; Gaurav Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-07

6.  Molecular pathology of total knee arthroplasty instability defined by RNA-seq.

Authors:  Eric A Lewallen; Christopher G Salib; William H Trousdale; Charlotte E Berry; Gabrielle M Hanssen; Joseph X Robin; Meagan E Tibbo; Anthony Viste; Nicolas Reina; Mark E Morrey; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Arlen D Hanssen; Daniel J Berry; Andre J van Wijnen; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  PROMs in total knee replacement: analysis of negative outcomes.

Authors:  F Begum; A Panagiotidou; C Park; T Ashdown; S El-Tawil
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Education, engagement and provision of empathy by trained counselor enhances the patient satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe; Ravi Vinod Shah; Pritesh Omprakash Agrawal; Jehangir Malcolm Pestonji; Shubhankar Sanjay Londhe; Maulik Kiranbhai Langaliya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  Dissatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty: a registry study involving 114 patients with 8-13 years of followup.

Authors:  Abdulemir Ali; Martin Sundberg; Otto Robertsson; Leif E Dahlberg; Carina A Thorstensson; Inga Redlund-Johnell; Ingvar Kristiansson; Anders Lindstrand
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system.

Authors:  Rachid Rassir; Inger N Sierevelt; Marjolein Schager; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.