Literature DB >> 2575767

Phylogenetic relations between microbats, megabats and primates (Mammalia: Chiroptera and Primates).

J D Pettigrew1, B G Jamieson, S K Robson, L S Hall, K I McAnally, H M Cooper.   

Abstract

We examine the paraphylectic hypothesis of bat origins, both in the light of previous discussions, and in the light of new evidence from our analyses of neurological traits and wing morphology. Megabats share with primates a variety of complex details in the organization of neural pathways that have not been found in any other mammalian group, particularly not in microbats. The features previously used to link microbats and megabats have been examined and found to be questionable bases for support of a monophyletic origin. In particular, morphological analyses of the musculoskeletal adaptations associated with the flight apparatus are consistent with two separate origins of the mammalian wing. Taken together, these analyses suggest that megabats evolved from an early branch of the primate lineage. This branch was comprised of moderate-sized, phytophagous gliders, of which the other living descendants are the dermopterans. Microbats, in contrast, probably evolved much earlier from small, agile insectivores whose forelimbs had long metacarpals in relation to their phalanges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2575767     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1989.0102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  18 in total

1.  Warm-up rates during arousal from torpor in heterothermic mammals: physiological correlates and a comparison with heterothermic insects.

Authors:  G N Stone; A Purvis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats.

Authors:  Emma C Teeling; Ole Madsen; Ronald A Van den Bussche; Wilfried W de Jong; Michael J Stanhope; Mark S Springer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Visual responses of neurones in the second visual area of flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus) after lesions of striate cortex.

Authors:  A P Funk; M G Rosa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  The sensory world of the platypus.

Authors:  J D Pettigrew; P R Manger; S L Fine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families.

Authors:  M Volleth; K G Heller; R A Pfeiffer; H Hameister
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. III. The questions of microchiropteran monophyly.

Authors:  J M Hutcheon; J A Kirsch; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. II. DNA-hybridization trees based on AT- and GC-enriched tracers.

Authors:  J A Kirsch; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Reconstructing phylogenies and phenotypes: a molecular view of human evolution.

Authors:  Brenda J Bradley
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Anti-lyssaviral activity of interferons κ and ω from the serotine bat, Eptesicus serotinus.

Authors:  Xiaocui He; Tomaš Korytař; Juliane Schatz; Conrad M Freuling; Thomas Müller; Bernd Köllner
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Molecular phylogeny of the superorder Archonta.

Authors:  R M Adkins; R L Honeycutt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.