Literature DB >> 11805285

Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats.

Emma C Teeling1, Ole Madsen, Ronald A Van den Bussche, Wilfried W de Jong, Michael J Stanhope, Mark S Springer.   

Abstract

Molecular phylogenies challenge the view that bats belong to the superordinal group Archonta, which also includes primates, tree shrews, and flying lemurs. Some molecular studies also challenge microbat monophyly and instead support an alliance between megabats and representative rhinolophoid microbats from the families Rhinolophidae (horseshoe bats, Old World leaf-nosed bats) and Megadermatidae (false vampire bats). Another molecular study ostensibly contradicts these results and supports traditional microbat monophyly, inclusive of representative rhinolophoids from the family Nycteridae (slit-faced bats). Resolution of the microbat paraphyly/monophyly issue is essential for reconstructing the temporal sequence and deployment of morphological character state changes associated with flight and echolocation in bats. If microbats are paraphyletic, then laryngeal echolocation either evolved more than once in different microbats or was lost in megabats after evolving in the ancestor of all living bats. To examine these issues, we used a 7.1-kb nuclear data set for nine outgroups and twenty bats, including representatives of all rhinolophoid families. Phylogenetic analyses and statistical tests rejected both Archonta and microbat monophyly. Instead, bats are in the superorder Laurasiatheria and microbats are paraphyletic. Further, the superfamily Rhinolophoidea is polyphyletic. The rhinolophoid families Rhinolophidae and Megadermatidae belong to the suborder Yinpterochiroptera along with rhinopomatids and megabats. The rhinolophoid family Nycteridae belongs to the suborder Yangochiroptera along with vespertilionoids, noctilionoids, and emballonuroids. These results resolve the apparent conflict between previous molecular studies that sampled different rhinolophoid families. An important implication of rhinolophoid polyphyly is independent evolution of key anatomical innovations associated with the nasal-emission of echolocation pulses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805285      PMCID: PMC122208          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.022477199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Phylogenetics. Which mammalian supertree to bark up?

Authors:  M S Springer; W W de Jong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats.

Authors:  E C Teeling; M Scally; D J Kao; M L Romagnoli; M S Springer; M J Stanhope
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals.

Authors:  F G Liu; M M Miyamoto; N P Freire; P Q Ong; M R Tennant; T S Young; K F Gugel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.

Authors:  M S Springer; E C Teeling; O Madsen; M J Stanhope; W W de Jong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals.

Authors:  P J Waddell; N Okada; M Hasegawa
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Monophyletic origin of the order chiroptera and its phylogenetic position among mammalia, as inferred from the complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of a Japanese megabat, the Ryukyu flying fox (Pteropus dasymallus).

Authors:  M Nikaido; M Harada; Y Cao; M Hasegawa; N Okada
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals.

Authors:  O Madsen; M Scally; C J Douady; D J Kao; R W DeBry; R Adkins; H M Amrine; M J Stanhope; W W de Jong; M S Springer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals.

Authors:  W J Murphy; E Eizirik; W E Johnson; Y P Zhang; O A Ryder; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  DNA synapomorphies for a variety of taxonomic levels from a cosmid library from the New World bat Macrotus waterhousii.

Authors:  R J Baker; J L Longmire; M Maltbie; M J Hamilton; R A Van Den Bussche
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  41 in total

1.  Parallel signatures of sequence evolution among hearing genes in echolocating mammals: an emerging model of genetic convergence.

Authors:  K T J Davies; J A Cotton; J D Kirwan; E C Teeling; S J Rossiter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The voltage-gated potassium channel subfamily KQT member 4 (KCNQ4) displays parallel evolution in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Naijian Han; Lucía F Franchini; Huihui Xu; Francisco Pisciottano; Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Koilmani Emmanuvel Rajan; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The relative influence of competition and prey defences on the trophic structure of animalivorous bat ensembles.

Authors:  M Corrie Schoeman; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Comparative cytogenetics of bats (Chiroptera): the prevalence of Robertsonian translocations limits the power of chromosomal characters in resolving interfamily phylogenetic relationships.

Authors:  Xiuguang Mao; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Weiting Su; Qing Feng; Yingxiang Wang; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families.

Authors:  M Volleth; K G Heller; R A Pfeiffer; H Hameister
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  The Evolutionary Pathway to Virulence of an RNA Virus.

Authors:  Adi Stern; Ming Te Yeh; Tal Zinger; Matt Smith; Caroline Wright; Guy Ling; Rasmus Nielsen; Andrew Macadam; Raul Andino
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Phylogenetic and geographic patterns of bartonella host shifts among bat species.

Authors:  Clifton D McKee; David T S Hayman; Michael Y Kosoy; Colleen T Webb
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Difference in glucose tolerance between phytophagous and insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Xingwen Peng; Xiangyang He; Yunxiao Sun; Jie Liang; Huanwang Xie; Junhua Wang; Libiao Zhang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Additional morphometric and phylogenetic studies on Mothocya melanosticta (Isopoda: Cymothoidae) parasitizing the Red Sea Nemipterus randalli fish in Egypt.

Authors:  Nisreen E Mahmoud; Magdy M Fahmy; Mai M Abuowarda
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2020-02-12

10.  Karyotype evolution in Rhinolophus bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) illuminated by cross-species chromosome painting and G-banding comparison.

Authors:  Xiuguang Mao; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Weiting Su; Lei Ao; Qing Feng; Yingxiang Wang; Marianne Volleth; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.