| Literature DB >> 25756244 |
XinYu Zhao1, Zimin Wei, Yue Zhao, Beidou Xi, Xueqin Wang, Taozhi Zhao, Xu Zhang, Yuquan Wei.
Abstract
This study presents seasonal and spatial variations of the ammonifying bacteria (AB) and denitrifying bacteria (DNB) and physicochemical parameters in 10 lakes and reservoirs in the northeast of China. Water samples were collected in winter (January), spring (March), summer (July) and fall (November) in 2011. The study revealed that physicochemical parameters such as pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), NH4 (+) -N and nitrate as nitrogen were closely related with the distribution of AB and DNB. Seasonally, the levels of AB presents gradually upward trend from winter to summer, and declines in fall and DNB were higher in spring and fall than summer and lowest in winter. Spatially, the annual average of AB among 10 lakes and reservoirs showed insignificant difference (P > 0.05), for DNB, Udalianchi and Lianhuan Lake were lower than others (P < 0.05). Regression correlation analysis showed that the levels of AB and DNB had a close relationship with nitrogen nutrition. Three principal components were identified of total variances which are conditionally classified by the 'natural' factor (PC1) and 'nitrogen nutrients' (PC2, PC3). According the principal component scores, cluster analysis detected two distinct groups: (C1) mainly affected by nitrogen nutrients and (C2) natural environmental factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25756244 PMCID: PMC4408186 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Fig 1Seasonal changes of variables pH, DO, TN, NH4+-N and NO3−-N in 10 lakes and reservoirs.
Correlation matrix for levels of ammonia and denitrifying bacteria and physicochemical parameters in water samples
| TN | NH4+-N | LgAB | NO3−-N | NO2−-N | LgDNB | pH | DO | TSS | EC | TA | CODMn | HCO3− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+-N | 0.034 | ||||||||||||
| LgAB | −0.145 | ||||||||||||
| NO3−-N | −0.202 | −0.418 | |||||||||||
| NO2−-N | −0.287 | −0.236 | |||||||||||
| LgDNB | 0.421 | −0.121 | −0.263 | 0.293 | |||||||||
| pH | −0.178 | 0.616 | 0.639 | −0.368 | −0.255 | −0.090 | |||||||
| DO | −0.239 | 0.304 | − | −0.340 | − | −0.214 | |||||||
| TSS | 0.460 | −0.141 | −0.189 | 0.488 | 0.233 | −0.424 | −0.161 | ||||||
| EC | 0.077 | 0.466 | 0.523 | −0.144 | −0.165 | 0.127 | −0.324 | −0.574 | |||||
| TA | 0.005 | 0.463 | 0.526 | −0.204 | −0.226 | 0.127 | −0.344 | −0.577 | |||||
| CODMn | −0.458 | 0.512 | − | −0.629 | −0.210 | 0.247 | −0.517 | 0.523 | 0.546 | ||||
| HCO3− | −0.002 | 0.472 | 0.536 | −0.217 | −0.231 | 0.100 | −0.324 | −0.583 | 0.556 | ||||
| CO32− | 0.073 | 0.421 | 0.468 | −0.119 | −0.187 | 0.284 | −0.436 | −0.530 | 0.493 |
means significant difference (p < 0.05)
means significant difference (p < 0.01).
Fig 2Levels of AB in 10 water reservoirs. Each datum represents the mean ± standard deviation. The average of AB among the 10 reservoirs is not significantly different (P > 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA.
Fig 3Levels of DNB in 10 water reservoirs. Each datum represents the mean ± standard deviation. The average of DNB in HW, HL, HT is significantly different than other reservoirs (P < 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA.
Fig 4Regression correlation matrix for AB and DNB levels and nitrogen compounds in 10 lakes and reservoirs.
Rotated (varimax rotation) factor loadings and communalities
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TA | 0.978 | −0.065 | 0.110 |
| CO32− | 0.977 | 0.022 | 0.047 |
| EC | 0.975 | −0.007 | 0.130 |
| HCO3− | 0.974 | −0.078 | 0.123 |
| pH | 0.802 | −0.243 | 0.302 |
| TN | 0.061 | 0.961 | 0.108 |
| NO3−-N | −0.101 | 0.937 | −0.170 |
| NO2−-N | −0.202 | 0.851 | 0.031 |
| LgDNB | 0.140 | 0.689 | −0.386 |
| TSS | −0.562 | 0.590 | 0.170 |
| CODMn | 0.520 | −0.572 | 0.505 |
| LgAB | 0.433 | −0.228 | 0.843 |
| NH4+-N | 0.436 | −0.099 | 0.795 |
| DO | −0.451 | 0.251 | 0.677 |
| Percent variance (%) | 48.618 | 22.749 | 14.219 |
Fig 5Dendrogram with Baverage's linkage and correlation distance obtained from hierarchical cluster analysis for 10 water reservoirs.
Fig 6Distribution of 10 water reservoirs.