Literature DB >> 17242978

Spatial-temporal variation and comparative assessment of water qualities of urban river system: a case study of the river Bagmati (Nepal).

Prakash Raj Kannel1, Seockheon Lee, Sushil Raj Kanel, Siddhi Pratap Khan, Young-Soo Lee.   

Abstract

The study presents the assessment of variation of water qualities, classification of monitoring networks and detection of pollution sources along the Bagmati River and its tributaries in the Kathmandu valley of Nepal. Seventeen stations, monitored for 23 physical and chemical parameters in pre-monsoon, monsoon, post-monsoon and winter seasons, during the period 1999-2003, were selected for the purpose of this study. The study revealed that the upstream river water qualities in the rural areas were increasingly affected from human sewage and chemical fertilizers. In downstream urban areas, the river was heavily polluted with untreated municipal sewage. The contribution of industries to pollute the river was minimal. The higher ratio of COD to BOD (3.74 in the rural and 2.06 in the urban) confirmed the increased industrial activities in the rural areas. An increasing trend of nitrate was found in the rural areas. In the urban areas, increasing trend of phosphorus was detected. The water quality measurement in the study period showed that DO was below 4 mg/l and BOD, COD, TIN, TP and TSS above 39.1, 59.2, 10.1, 0.84 and 199 mg/l, respectively, in the urban areas. In the rural areas, DO was above 6.2 mg/l and BOD, COD, TIN, TP and TSS below 15.9, 31, 5.24, 0.41 and 134.5 mg/l, respectively. The analysis for data from 1988 to 2003 at a key station in the river revealed that BOD was increasing at a rate of 1.8 mg/l in the Bagmati River. A comparative study for the water quality variables in the urban areas showed that the main river and its tributaries were equally polluted. The other comparison showed the urban water qualities were significantly poor as compared with rural. The cluster analysis detected three distinct monitoring groups: (1) low water pollution region, (2) medium water pollution region, (3) heavy water pollution region. For rapid assessment of water qualities using the representative sites could serve to optimize cost and time without loosing any significance of the outcome. The factor analysis revealed distinct groups of sources and pollutions (organics, nutrients, solutes and physicochemical).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242978     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9375-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  11 in total

1.  Water quality management planning zone development by introducing a GIS tool in Kathmandu valley, Nepal.

Authors:  S R Ha; D Pokhrel
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Surface water pollution in three urban territories of Nepal, India, and Bangladesh.

Authors:  S K Karn; H Harada
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Factors influencing development of management strategies for the Abou Ali River in Lebanon I: spatial variation and land use.

Authors:  May A Massoud; Mutasem El-Fadel; Mark D Scrimshaw; John N Lester
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  LOIS in-stream water quality modelling. Part 1. Catchments and methods.

Authors:  David B Boorman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  A review of currently available in-stream water-quality models and their applicability for simulating dissolved oxygen in lowland rivers.

Authors:  B A Cox
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Quality of surface fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to be support fish life: 12 years of monitoring pursuant to European Union Directive 78/659/EEC.

Authors:  Carla Giansante; Giampiero Scortichini; Valeria Melai; Sandro Pelini; Nicola Ferri
Journal:  Vet Ital       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.101

7.  Patterns in nutrient concentrations and biological quality indices across the upper Thames river basin, UK.

Authors:  Helen P Jarvi; Esther Lycett; Colin Neal; Alison Love
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2002-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Tolerance of developing salmonid eggs and fry to nitrate exposure.

Authors:  J W Kincheloe; G A Wedemeyer; D L Koch
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Nutrient chemistry of River Pinios (Thessalia, Greece).

Authors:  D Bellos; T Sawidis; I Tsekos
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Groundwater contamination assessment for sustainable water supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.

Authors:  N R Khatlwada; S Takizawa; T V N Tran; M Inoue
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.915

View more
  20 in total

1.  Long-term variations of water quality parameters in the Maroon River, Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Tabari; Safar Marofi; Mohammad Ahmadi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Chemometrics in assessment of seasonal variation of water quality in fresh water systems.

Authors:  Prakash Raj Kannel; Sushil R Kanel; Seockheon Lee; Y-S Lee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Evaluating climatic and non-climatic stresses for declining surface water quality in Bagmati River of Nepal.

Authors:  Jeeban Panthi; Fengting Li; Hongtao Wang; Suman Aryal; Piyush Dahal; Sheila Ghimire; Martin Kabenge
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Comparison among different ASEAN water quality indices for the assessment of the spatial variation of surface water quality in the Selangor river basin, Malaysia.

Authors:  Yong Jie Wong; Yoshihisa Shimizu; Kai He; Nik Meriam Nik Sulaiman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Organic pollution of the Büyük Menderes River, Turkey and effects on aquaculture.

Authors:  Ebru Yılmaz; Cengiz Koç
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Major ion chemistry and hydrochemical studies of groundwater of parts of Palar river basin, Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Mithas Ahmad Dar; K Sankar; Imran Ahmad Dar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Applying a water quality index model to assess the water quality of the major rivers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.

Authors:  Ram Krishna Regmi; Binaya Kumar Mishra; Yoshifumi Masago; Pingping Luo; Asako Toyozumi-Kojima; Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Dissolved heavy metals in the Tigris River (Turkey): spatial and temporal variations.

Authors:  Memet Varol; Bülent Gökot; Aysel Bekleyen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Water quality assessment near an industrial site of Damodar River, India.

Authors:  Soroj Kumar Chatterjee; Indranil Bhattacharjee; Goutam Chandra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Assessment of water pollution in the Antuã River basin (Northwestern Portugal).

Authors:  M A Cerqueira; J F Silva; F P Magalhães; F M Soares; J J Pato
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.