BACKGROUND: Poor communication between hospitalists and outpatient physicians can contribute to adverse events after discharge. Electronic medical records (EMRs) shared by inpatient and outpatient clinicians offer primary care providers (PCPs) better access to information surrounding a patient's hospitalization. However, the PCP experience and subsequent expectations for discharge communication within a shared EMR are unknown. METHODS: We surveyed PCPs 1 year after a shared EMR was implemented at our institution to assess PCP satisfaction with current discharge communication practices and identify areas for improvement. RESULTS: Seventy-five of 124 (60%) clinicians completed the survey. Although most PCPs reported receiving automated discharge notifications (71%), only 39% felt that notifications plus discharge summaries were adequate for safe transitions of care. PCPs expressed that complex hospitalizations necessitated additional communication via e-mail or telephone; only 31% reported receiving such communication. The content most important in additional communication included medication changes, follow-up actions, and active medical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimized access to information provided by a shared EMR, only 52% of PCPs were satisfied with current discharge communication. PCPs express a continued need for high-touch communication for safe transitions of care. Further standardization of discharge communication practices is necessary.
BACKGROUND: Poor communication between hospitalists and outpatient physicians can contribute to adverse events after discharge. Electronic medical records (EMRs) shared by inpatient and outpatient clinicians offer primary care providers (PCPs) better access to information surrounding a patient's hospitalization. However, the PCP experience and subsequent expectations for discharge communication within a shared EMR are unknown. METHODS: We surveyed PCPs 1 year after a shared EMR was implemented at our institution to assess PCP satisfaction with current discharge communication practices and identify areas for improvement. RESULTS: Seventy-five of 124 (60%) clinicians completed the survey. Although most PCPs reported receiving automated discharge notifications (71%), only 39% felt that notifications plus discharge summaries were adequate for safe transitions of care. PCPs expressed that complex hospitalizations necessitated additional communication via e-mail or telephone; only 31% reported receiving such communication. The content most important in additional communication included medication changes, follow-up actions, and active medical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimized access to information provided by a shared EMR, only 52% of PCPs were satisfied with current discharge communication. PCPs express a continued need for high-touch communication for safe transitions of care. Further standardization of discharge communication practices is necessary.
Authors: Sara C Keller; Ayse P Gurses; Nicole Werner; Dawn Hohl; Ashley Hughes; Bruce Leff; Alicia I Arbaje Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Susan L Calcaterra; Anne D Drabkin; Sarah E Leslie; Reina Doyle; Stephen Koester; Joseph W Frank; Jennifer A Reich; Ingrid A Binswanger Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Lindsay Weiss; Anthony Cooley; Evan Orenstein; Matthew Levy; Mary Edmond; Emily Wong; Hannah Hua; Nicole Hames Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2020-07-10