| Literature DB >> 25754794 |
Juyeon Oh1, Sunghoon Jeon, Jihye Choi.
Abstract
This study evaluated perfusion of skeletal muscle using contrast enhanced ultrasonography in humerus, radius, femur and tibia in normal dogs. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography for each region was performed after injecting 0.5 mL and 1 mL of contrast medium (SonoVue) in every dog. Blood perfusion was assessed quantitatively by measuring the peak intensity, time to the peak intensity and area under the curve from the time-intensity curve. Vascularization in skeletal muscle was qualitatively graded with a score of 0-3 according to the number of vascular signals. A parabolic shape of time-intensity curve was observed from muscles in normal dogs, and time to the peak intensity, the peak intensity and area under the curve of each muscle were not significantly different according to the appendicular regions examined and the dosage of contrast agent administered. This study reports that feasibility of contrast enhanced ultrasonography for assessment of the muscular perfusion in canine appendicular regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25754794 PMCID: PMC4527499 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Fig. 1.Contrast enhanced ultrasonography on harmonic detection mode before (A) and after (B) contrast agent injection at the skeletal muscle of the humerus. Transient increase of vascular intensity (arrows) and then disappearance was easily observed from all skeletal muscles after injecting the contrast medium.
Fig. 2.Conventional ultrasonography on color Doppler mode (A) and contrast enhanced ultrasonography on harmonic detection mode (B) of radius. Region of interest placed over the muscle on contrast enhanced ultrasonography and time‒intensity curves (C). The muscle area had a typical parabolic curve, which consisted of inflow, outflow and peak intensity.
Mean values of time-intensity curve parameters in appendicular muscles after injection of 0.5 ml or 1 ml contrast agent
| PI (level) | AUC | TP (msec) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 m | 1 m | 0.5 m | 1 m | 0.5 m | 1 m | |
| Humerus | 28.84 ± 9.69 | 22.62 ± 4.20 | 1,642.39 ± 643.23 | 1,474.06 ± 372.80 | 40,763 ± 10,274 | 38,576 ± 10,983 |
| Radius | 19.86 ± 8.92 | 16.15 ± 4.44 | 1,402.64 ± 851.85 | 838.91 ± 366.67 | 37,649 ± 5,976 | 43,101 ± 11,463 |
| Femur | 23.25 ± 14.36 | 28.31 ± 10.37 | 1,786.42 ± 1,279.55 | 2,041.50 ± 769.36 | 43,969 ± 5,976 | 38,576 ± 8,281 |
| Tibia | 16.40 ± 6.18 | 18.50 ± 1.60 | 1,143.29 ± 475.52 | 1,309.10 ± 280.76 | 42,890 ± 10,373 | 45,770 ± 6,707 |
Data are mean and standard deviation.
Mean intra- and inter-reproducibility coefficients of peak intensity, area under the curve and time to peak intensity of the soft tissue in each appendicular bone region using 0.5 ml or 1 ml contrast agent in appendicular muscles
| 0.5 m | 1 m | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-reproducibility coefficients | Inter-reproducibility coefficients | Intra-reproducibility coefficients | Inter-reproducibility coefficients | |||||||||
| PI | TP | AUC | PI | TP | AUC | PI | TP | AUC | PI | TP | AUC | |
| Humerus | 0.759 | 0.827 | 0.835 | 0.871 | 0.864 | 0.806 | 0.859 | 0.972 | 0.935 | 0.871 | 0.984 | 0.906 |
| Radius | 0.906 | 0.808 | 0.832 | 0.755 | 0.952 | 0.860 | 0.906 | 0.998 | 0.942 | 0.765 | 0.962 | 0.860 |
| Femur | 0.924 | 0.970 | 0.931 | 0.933 | 0.678 | 0.927 | 0.924 | 1.000 | 0.971 | 0.86 | 0.678 | 0.927 |
| Tibia | 0.742 | 0.744 | 0.801 | 0.899 | 0.751 | 0.856 | 0.772 | 0.774 | 0.841 | 0.95 | 0.891 | 0.885 |