Literature DB >> 19730857

Developments in musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical applications.

Andrea S Klauser1, Philippe Peetrons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) technologies are rapidly advancing, offering several refined transducer technologies as well as soft and hardware facilities. The aim of this article is to outline US developments, from B-mode technologies over Doppler advances to more sophisticated technologies, and their potential clinical impact in the field of musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging. NEW ADVANCES: When using B-mode ultrasound, compound imaging and beam-steering are of help to decrease anisotropy in tendons and ligaments, that are less well depicted due to their oblique course. Doppler imaging has become sensitive in the detection of flow in small vessels, which is of particular value in rheumatologic conditions, tumour and overuse assessment. The use of US microbubble contrast agents improves detection of low-volume blood flow in smaller vessels by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby facilitating detection of angiogenetic vessels in inflammatory conditions or tumours. The use of US blood pool contrast agents enables molecular imaging in real-time, and thus the diagnostic potential of US is expanded, opening up a new field of US applications. Objective quantification of altered tissue (e.g., synovial proliferation, tumours) is still demanding and might be improved by the use of three-dimensional imaging and software tools as parametric evaluation. Real-time sonoelastography (EUS) is a new development for visualization of tissue elasticity by measurement of tissue displacement in terms of tissue stiffness changes, promising new insights into tendon disorders. Image fusion is an exciting development that enables superimposition of CT/MRI data sets on real-time US scanning. This technique might be helpful in guiding injections under real-time conditions even in regions less easily accessible by US as, for instance, the axial skeleton, and can additionally provide an interesting tool for teaching MSK imaging and ways to guide interventions.
CONCLUSION: In summary, exciting developments are expanding the applications of US in the MSK field, offering the advantages of real-time performance, high tissue resolution and relative speed at a reasonable cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19730857     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0782-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  55 in total

1.  Interventional MR imaging for injection of sacroiliac joints in patients with sacroiliitis.

Authors:  P L Pereira; I Günaydin; J Trübenbach; F Dammann; C T Remy; I Kötter; F Schick; C W Koenig; C D Claussen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Synovial tissue of the hip at power Doppler US: correlation between vascularity and power Doppler US signal.

Authors:  Markus Walther; Harry Harms; Veit Krenn; Stephan Radke; Stephan Kirschner; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Rotator cuff in asymptomatic volunteers: contrast-enhanced US depiction of intratendinous and peritendinous vascularity.

Authors:  Ronald S Adler; Stephen Fealy; Jonas R Rudzki; Warren Kadrmas; Nikhil N Verma; Andrew Pearle; Stephen Lyman; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Angiogenesis and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis and other systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Edit Bodolay; Alisa E Koch; Joon Kim; Gyula Szegedi; Zoltan Szekanecz
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

5.  The value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Andrea Klauser; Ferdinand Frauscher; Michael Schirmer; Ethan Halpern; Leo Pallwein; Manfred Herold; Gernot Helweg; Dieter ZurNedden
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-03

6.  Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography--initial experience.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Tatsuya Higashi; Ryo Asato; Shinzo Tanaka; Juichi Ito; Masahiro Hiraoka; Michael F Insana; Aaron B Brill; Tsuneo Saga; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons.

Authors:  Tobias De Zordo; Christian Fink; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Vinzenz Smekal; Markus Reindl; Andrea Sabine Klauser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring the efficacy of a bradykinin receptor 2 antagonist in painful knee osteoarthritis compared with MRI.

Authors:  I H Song; C E Althoff; K G Hermann; A K Scheel; T Knetsch; G R Burmester; M Backhaus
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Philip G Conaghan; Philip O'Connor; Dennis McGonagle; Paul Astin; Richard J Wakefield; Wayne W Gibbon; Mark Quinn; Zunaid Karim; Michael J Green; Susanna Proudman; John Isaacs; Paul Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-01

10.  Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Peter Struve; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Georg Bartsch; Johann Gradl; Matthias Schurich; Florian Pedross; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  21 in total

1.  Real-time sonoelastography of the Achilles tendon: pattern description in healthy subjects and patients with surgically repaired complete ruptures.

Authors:  Sinan Tan; Savaş Kudaş; Ayşenur Sirin Özcan; Ali İpek; Mustafa Karaoğlanoğlu; Halil Arslan; Murat Bozkurt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Ultrasound elastography in children: establishing the normal range of muscle elasticity.

Authors:  Netanel S Berko; Erin F Fitzgerald; Terry D Amaral; Monica Payares; Terry L Levin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-10-09

3.  Efficacy of ultrasound elastography in detecting active myositis in children: can it replace MRI?

Authors:  Netanel S Berko; Arielle Hay; Yonit Sterba; Dawn Wahezi; Terry L Levin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 4.  Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: what is the utility of ultrasound?

Authors:  Hershernpal A S Basra; Paul D Humphries
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Current and Prospective Use of Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging at Chiropractic Teaching Institutions: A Worldwide Survey of Diagnostic Imaging Staff.

Authors:  Rogan E A Henderson; Bruce F Walker; Kenneth J Young
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-11-22

6.  Detection of small tendon lesions by sonoelastographic visualization of strain profile differences: initial experiences.

Authors:  Aline R Buck; Nina Verstraete; Yufei Li; Andreas Schweizer; Jess G Snedeker; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Difference-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging With Non-Linear Contrast.

Authors:  Yilei Li; Dina Polyak; Eli Johnson; Derek Yecies; Saba Shevidi; Adam de la Zerda; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Steven Chu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  Sonographic evaluation of athletic pubalgia.

Authors:  Nicholas Morley; Thomas Grant; Kevin Blount; Imran Omar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Muscle injuries: ultrasound evaluation in the acute phase.

Authors:  F Draghi; M Zacchino; M Canepari; P Nucci; F Alessandrino
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-05-08

10.  Detection of peripheral nerve pathology: comparison of ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Craig M Zaidman; Michael J Seelig; Jonathan C Baker; Susan E Mackinnon; Alan Pestronk
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.