Literature DB >> 25754068

Spatial frequency processing in scene-selective cortical regions.

Louise Kauffmann1, Stephen Ramanoël2, Nathalie Guyader3, Alan Chauvin4, Carole Peyrin4.   

Abstract

Visual analysis begins with the parallel extraction of different attributes at different spatial frequencies. Low spatial frequencies (LSF) convey coarse information and are characterized by high luminance contrast, while high spatial frequencies (HSF) convey fine details and are characterized by low luminance contrast. In the present fMRI study, we examined how scene-selective regions-the parahippocampal place area (PPA), the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and the occipital place area (OPA)-responded to spatial frequencies when contrast was either equalized or not equalized across spatial frequencies. Participants performed a categorization task on LSF, HSF and non-filtered scenes belonging to two different categories (indoors and outdoors). We either left contrast across scenes untouched, or equalized it using a root-mean-square contrast normalization. We found that when contrast remained unmodified, LSF and NF scenes elicited greater activation than HSF scenes in the PPA. However, when contrast was equalized across spatial frequencies, the PPA was selective to HFS. This suggests that PPA activity relies on an interaction between spatial frequency and contrast in scenes. In the RSC, LSF and NF elicited greater response than HSF scenes when contrast was not modified, while no effect of spatial frequencies appeared when contrast was equalized across filtered scenes, suggesting that the RSC is sensitive to high-contrast information. Finally, we observed selective activation of the OPA in response to HSF, irrespective of contrast manipulation. These results provide new insights into how scene-selective areas operate during scene processing.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Occipital place area; Parahippocampal place area; Retrosplenial cortex; Root mean square contrast; Spatial frequencies

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25754068     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Semantic Knowledge of Famous People and Places Is Represented in Hippocampus and Distinct Cortical Networks.

Authors:  Neal W Morton; Ellen L Zippi; Sharon M Noh; Alison R Preston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Contributions of low- and high-level properties to neural processing of visual scenes in the human brain.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Edward H Silson; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The occipital place area represents first-person perspective motion information through scenes.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Vishal Lall; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  The occipital place area represents the local elements of scenes.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Joshua B Julian; Jonas Kubilius; Nancy Kanwisher; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Two Distinct Scene-Processing Networks Connecting Vision and Memory.

Authors:  Christopher Baldassano; Andre Esteva; Li Fei-Fei; Diane M Beck
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-10-24

7.  Scene wheels: Measuring perception and memory of real-world scenes with a continuous stimulus space.

Authors:  Gaeun Son; Dirk B Walther; Michael L Mack
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Age-Related Differences in Spatial Frequency Processing during Scene Categorization.

Authors:  Stephen Ramanoël; Louise Kauffmann; Emilie Cousin; Michel Dojat; Carole Peyrin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting individual brain maturity using dynamic functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jian Qin; Shan-Guang Chen; Dewen Hu; Ling-Li Zeng; Yi-Ming Fan; Xiao-Ping Chen; Hui Shen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Rectilinear Edge Selectivity Is Insufficient to Explain the Category Selectivity of the Parahippocampal Place Area.

Authors:  Peter B Bryan; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.