Literature DB >> 25753647

Phrase Length and Prosody in On-Line Ambiguity Resolution.

Ronit Webman-Shafran1,2, Janet Dean Fodor3.   

Abstract

We investigated the processing of ambiguous double-PP constructions in Hebrew. Selection restrictions forced the first prepositional phrase (PP1) to attach low, but PP2 could attach maximally high to VP or maximally low to the NP inside PP1. A length contrast in PP2 was also examined. This construction affords more potential locations for prosodic boundaries, and has a sharper structural contrast between the two attachment sites, than the single-PP construction which has yielded mixed results in previous work. A combined production-comprehension task showed more productions of pre-PP2 prosodic boundaries for long-PP2 than short-PP2. In comprehension, high PP2-attachment was favored by a prosodic boundary before PP2, regardless of PP2 length. This study provides performance data supporting the interplay of phrase lengths with structure-sensitivity as posited in the linguistics literature on the syntax-prosody interface, and supports the claim that readers are sensitive to the structural implications of the prosody they project onto sentences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PP-attachment; Phrase lengths; Reading aloud; Sentence comprehension; Syntax–prosody interface

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25753647     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-015-9358-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  10 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

3.  Recycling prosodic boundaries.

Authors:  Yuki Hirose
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03

4.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Phrasing effects in comprehending PP constructions.

Authors:  Joel Pynte
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-05-12

6.  Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

7.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism.

Authors:  E Gibson; N Pearlmutter; E Canseco-Gonzalez; G Hickok
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-04

9.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.

Authors:  D W Allbritton; G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Creation of prosody during sentence production.

Authors:  F Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Endogenous Oscillations Time-Constrain Linguistic Segmentation: Cycling the Garden Path.

Authors:  Lena Henke; Lars Meyer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.