OBJECTIVE: To predict the likelihood of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) based on patient clinical presentations at admission DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis SETTING: Six US acute care hospitals PATIENTS: Adult inpatients METHODS: We used clinical data collected at the time of admission in electronic health record (EHR) systems to develop and validate a HO-CDI predictive model. The outcome measure was HO-CDI cases identified by a nonduplicate positive C. difficile toxin assay result with stool specimens collected >48 hours after inpatient admission. We fit a logistic regression model to predict the risk of HO-CDI. We validated the model using 1,000 bootstrap simulations. RESULTS: Among 78,080 adult admissions, 323 HO-CDI cases were identified (ie, a rate of 4.1 per 1,000 admissions). The logistic regression model yielded 14 independent predictors, including hospital community onset CDI pressure, patient age ≥65, previous healthcare exposures, CDI in previous admission, admission to the intensive care unit, albumin ≤3 g/dL, creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, bands >32%, platelets ≤150 or >420 109/L, and white blood cell count >11,000 mm3. The model had a c-statistic of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.81) with good calibration. Among 79% of patients with risk scores of 0-7, 19 HO-CDIs occurred per 10,000 admissions; for patients with risk scores >20, 623 HO-CDIs occurred per 10,000 admissions (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Using clinical parameters available at the time of admission, this HO-CDI model demonstrated good predictive ability, and it may have utility as an early risk identification tool for HO-CDI preventive interventions and outcome comparisons.
OBJECTIVE: To predict the likelihood of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) based on patient clinical presentations at admission DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis SETTING: Six US acute care hospitals PATIENTS: Adult inpatients METHODS: We used clinical data collected at the time of admission in electronic health record (EHR) systems to develop and validate a HO-CDI predictive model. The outcome measure was HO-CDI cases identified by a nonduplicate positive C. difficile toxin assay result with stool specimens collected >48 hours after inpatient admission. We fit a logistic regression model to predict the risk of HO-CDI. We validated the model using 1,000 bootstrap simulations. RESULTS: Among 78,080 adult admissions, 323 HO-CDI cases were identified (ie, a rate of 4.1 per 1,000 admissions). The logistic regression model yielded 14 independent predictors, including hospital community onset CDI pressure, patient age ≥65, previous healthcare exposures, CDI in previous admission, admission to the intensive care unit, albumin ≤3 g/dL, creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, bands >32%, platelets ≤150 or >420 109/L, and white blood cell count >11,000 mm3. The model had a c-statistic of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.81) with good calibration. Among 79% of patients with risk scores of 0-7, 19 HO-CDIs occurred per 10,000 admissions; for patients with risk scores >20, 623 HO-CDIs occurred per 10,000 admissions (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Using clinical parameters available at the time of admission, this HO-CDI model demonstrated good predictive ability, and it may have utility as an early risk identification tool for HO-CDI preventive interventions and outcome comparisons.
Authors: Ying P Tabak; Marya D Zilberberg; Richard S Johannes; Xiaowu Sun; L Clifford McDonald Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Marya D Zilberberg; Ying P Tabak; Dawn M Sievert; Karen G Derby; Richard S Johannes; Xiaowu Sun; L Clifford McDonald Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Erik R Dubberke; Yan Yan; Kimberly A Reske; Anne M Butler; Joshua Doherty; Victor Pham; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Shelley S Magill; Jonathan R Edwards; Wendy Bamberg; Zintars G Beldavs; Ghinwa Dumyati; Marion A Kainer; Ruth Lynfield; Meghan Maloney; Laura McAllister-Hollod; Joelle Nadle; Susan M Ray; Deborah L Thompson; Lucy E Wilson; Scott K Fridkin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan M Huse; Les Dethlefsen; Julie A Huber; David Mark Welch; David Mark Welch; David A Relman; Mitchell L Sogin Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Eric M Fountain; Maggie C Moses; Lawrence P Park; Christopher W Woods; Gowthami M Arepally Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Stephanie M Cabral; Katherine E Goodman; Natalia Blanco; Surbhi Leekha; Larry S Magder; Gita Nadimpalli; Lisa Pineles; Kerri A Thom; Anthony D Harris Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 6.520
Authors: Deverick J Anderson; Leoncio Flavio Rojas; Shera Watson; Lauren P Knelson; Sohayla Pruitt; Sarah S Lewis; Rebekah W Moehring; Emily E Sickbert Bennett; David J Weber; Luke F Chen; Daniel J Sexton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240