Literature DB >> 25752508

Phenological plasticity will not help all species adapt to climate change.

Anne Duputié1,2, Alexis Rutschmann2,3, Ophélie Ronce4, Isabelle Chuine2.   

Abstract

Concerns are rising about the capacity of species to adapt quickly enough to climate change. In long-lived organisms such as trees, genetic adaptation is slow, and how much phenotypic plasticity can help them cope with climate change remains largely unknown. Here, we assess whether, where and when phenological plasticity is and will be adaptive in three major European tree species. We use a process-based species distribution model, parameterized with extensive ecological data, and manipulate plasticity to suppress phenological variations due to interannual, geographical and trend climate variability, under current and projected climatic conditions. We show that phenological plasticity is not always adaptive and mostly affects fitness at the margins of the species' distribution and climatic niche. Under current climatic conditions, phenological plasticity constrains the northern range limit of oak and beech and the southern range limit of pine. Under future climatic conditions, phenological plasticity becomes strongly adaptive towards the trailing edges of beech and oak, but severely constrains the range and niche of pine. Our results call for caution when interpreting geographical variation in trait means as adaptive, and strongly point towards species distribution models explicitly taking phenotypic plasticity into account when forecasting species distribution under climate change scenarios.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  European beech; Scots pine; climate change; climatic niche; phenology; sessile oak; species distribution model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752508     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  23 in total

1.  Selective harvest focused on sexual signal traits can lead to extinction under directional environmental change.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Carlos Martínez-Ruiz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Plant adaptation to climate change - Where are we?

Authors:  Jill Anderson; Bao-Hua Song
Journal:  J Syst Evol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  On the capacity for rapid adaptation and plastic responses to herbivory and intraspecific competition in insular populations of Plectritis congesta.

Authors:  Cora L Skaien; Peter Arcese
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Predicting evolutionary rescue via evolving plasticity in stochastic environments.

Authors:  Jaime Ashander; Luis-Miguel Chevin; Marissa L Baskett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees.

Authors:  Sally N Aitken; Jordan B Bemmels
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Differences among six woody perennials native to Northern Europe in their level of genetic differentiation and adaptive potential at fine local scale.

Authors:  Albin Lobo; Jon Kehlet Hansen; Lars Nørgaard Hansen; Erik Dahl Kjær
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Differential responses of body growth to artificial warming between parasitoids and hosts and the consequences for plant seed damage.

Authors:  Xinqiang Xi; Yangheshan Yang; Xiaocheng Yang; Sören Nylin; Nico Eisenhauer; Shucun Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Local adaptation through genetic differentiation in highly fragmented Tilia cordata populations.

Authors:  Albin Lobo; Ole Kim Hansen; Jon Kehlet Hansen; Eva Ortvald Erichsen; Birgitte Jacobsen; Erik Dahl Kjær
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Plant phenological synchrony increases under rapid within-spring warming.

Authors:  Cong Wang; Yanhong Tang; Jin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Genetic adaptation as a biological buffer against climate change: Potential and limitations.

Authors:  Luc De Meester; Robby Stoks; Kristien I Brans
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.