UNLABELLED: POLICY POINTS: The American public--both men and women and those with and without children in the household--holds parents highly responsible and largely to blame for childhood obesity. High attributions of responsibility to parents for reducing childhood obesity did not universally undermine support for broader policy action. School-based obesity prevention policies were strongly supported, even among those viewing parents as mostly to blame for childhood obesity. Americans who viewed sectors outside the family (such as the food and beverage industry, schools, and the government) as helping address childhood obesity were more willing to support a wider range of population-based obesity prevention policies. CONTEXT: The public's views of parents' behaviors and choices--and the attitudes held by parents themselves--are likely to influence the success of efforts to reverse obesity rates. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 US national public opinion surveys fielded in 2011 and 2012 to examine attributions of blame and responsibility to parents for obesity, both among the general public and parents themselves, and we also explored the relationship between views of parents and support for obesity prevention policies. FINDINGS: We found that attribution of blame and responsibility to parents was consistently high, regardless of parental status or gender. Support for policies to curb childhood obesity also did not differ notably by parental status or gender. Multivariable analyses revealed consistent patterns in the association between public attitudes toward parents' responsibility and support for policies to curb childhood obesity. High parental responsibility was linked to higher support for school-targeted policies but generally was not associated with policies outside the school setting. Attribution of greater responsibility to entities external to children and their parents (schools, the food and beverage industry, and the government) was associated with greater support for both school-targeted and population-based obesity prevention policies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the high attribution of responsibility to parents for reducing childhood obesity does not universally undermine support for broader policy action. But appealing to parents to rally support for preventing obesity in the same way as for other parent-initiated social movements (eg, drunk driving) may be challenging outside the school setting.
UNLABELLED: POLICY POINTS: The American public--both men and women and those with and without children in the household--holds parents highly responsible and largely to blame for childhood obesity. High attributions of responsibility to parents for reducing childhood obesity did not universally undermine support for broader policy action. School-based obesity prevention policies were strongly supported, even among those viewing parents as mostly to blame for childhood obesity. Americans who viewed sectors outside the family (such as the food and beverage industry, schools, and the government) as helping address childhood obesity were more willing to support a wider range of population-based obesity prevention policies. CONTEXT: The public's views of parents' behaviors and choices--and the attitudes held by parents themselves--are likely to influence the success of efforts to reverse obesity rates. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 US national public opinion surveys fielded in 2011 and 2012 to examine attributions of blame and responsibility to parents for obesity, both among the general public and parents themselves, and we also explored the relationship between views of parents and support for obesity prevention policies. FINDINGS: We found that attribution of blame and responsibility to parents was consistently high, regardless of parental status or gender. Support for policies to curb childhood obesity also did not differ notably by parental status or gender. Multivariable analyses revealed consistent patterns in the association between public attitudes toward parents' responsibility and support for policies to curb childhood obesity. High parental responsibility was linked to higher support for school-targeted policies but generally was not associated with policies outside the school setting. Attribution of greater responsibility to entities external to children and their parents (schools, the food and beverage industry, and the government) was associated with greater support for both school-targeted and population-based obesity prevention policies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the high attribution of responsibility to parents for reducing childhood obesity does not universally undermine support for broader policy action. But appealing to parents to rally support for preventing obesity in the same way as for other parent-initiated social movements (eg, drunk driving) may be challenging outside the school setting.
Authors: Kelly D Brownell; Rogan Kersh; David S Ludwig; Robert C Post; Rebecca M Puhl; Marlene B Schwartz; Walter C Willett Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Sharon K Long; Genevieve M Kenney; Stephen Zuckerman; Dana E Goin; Douglas Wissoker; Fredric Blavin; Linda J Blumberg; Lisa Clemans-Cope; John Holahan; Katherine Hempstead Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Yiwei Xu; Elizabeth K Farkouh; Caroline A Dunetz; Sravya L Varanasi; Sophia Mathews; Sarah E Gollust; Erika Franklin Fowler; Steven Moore; Neil A Lewis; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Race Soc Probl Date: 2022-07-15
Authors: Jenna C Gorlick; Claire V Gorman; Heidi M Weeks; Arielle T Pearlman; Natasha A Schvey; Katherine W Bauer Journal: Child Obes Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Michelle Eykelenboom; Maartje M van Stralen; Margreet R Olthof; Carry M Renders; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Yang Liu; Yanan Ma; Nan Jiang; Shenzhi Song; Qian Fan; Deliang Wen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennie Rose; Cris Glazebrook; Heather Wharrad; A Niroshan Siriwardena; Judy Anne Swift; Dilip Nathan; Stephen Franklin Weng; Pippa Atkinson; Joanne Ablewhite; Fiona McMaster; Vicki Watson; Sarah Anne Redsell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Michelle Eykelenboom; Maartje M van Stralen; Margreet R Olthof; Linda J Schoonmade; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Carry M Renders Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Sarah E Gollust; Brooke A Cunningham; Barbara G Bokhour; Howard S Gordon; Charlene Pope; Somnath S Saha; Dina M Jones; Tam Do; Diana J Burgess Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730