Literature DB >> 25751548

Upper limb grafts for hemodialysis access.

David Shemesh1, Ilya Goldin, Anthony Verstandig, Daniel Berelowitz, Ibrahim Zaghal, Oded Olsha.   

Abstract

Arteriovenous (AV) grafts are required for hemodialysis access when options for native fistulas have been fully exhausted, where they continue to play an important role in hemodialysis patients, offering a better alternative to central vein catheters. When planning autogenous accesses using Doppler ultrasound, adequate arterial inflow and venous outflow must be consciously preserved for future access creation with grafts. Efforts to improve graft patency include changing graft configuration, graft biology and hemodynamics. Industry offers early cannulation grafts to reduce central catheter use and a bioengineered graft is undergoing clinical studies. Although the outcome of AV grafts is inferior to fistulas, grafts can provide long-term hemodialysis access that is a better alternative to central venous catheters. AV grafts have significant drawbacks, mainly poor patency, infection and cost but also have some advantages: early maturation, ease of creation and needling and widespread availability. The outcome of AV graft surgery is variable from center to center. The primary patency rate for AV grafts is 58% at 6 months and the secondary patency rate is 76% at 6 months and 55% at 18 months. There are centers of excellence that report a 1 year secondary patency rate of up to 91%. In this review of the use of AV grafts for hemodialysis access in the upper extremities, technical issues involved in planning the access and performing the surgery in its different configurations are discussed and the role of surveillance and maintenance with their attendant surgical and radiological interventions is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25751548     DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Access        ISSN: 1129-7298            Impact factor:   2.283


  2 in total

Review 1.  Left Distal Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention: Insights from Early Clinical Experience and Future Directions.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Zhenfei Fang; Shenghua Zhou; Xinqun Hu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.866

2.  Transradial access chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in comparation with transfemoral access.

Authors:  Nan Du; Min-Jie Yang; Jing-Qin Ma; Jian-Jun Luo; Zi-Han Zhang; Tian-Zhu Yu; Zhi-Yuan Zheng; Wen Zhang; Zhi-Ping Yan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.