Timothy J Hohman1, Susan P Bell2, Angela L Jefferson1. 1. Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee3Center for Quality Aging, Di.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: A subset of older adults present post mortem with Alzheimer disease (AD) pathologic features but without any significant clinical manifestation of dementia. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been implicated in staving off AD-related neurodegeneration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether VEGF levels are associated with brain aging outcomes (hippocampal volume and cognition) and to further evaluate whether VEGF modifies relations between AD biomarkers and brain aging outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Biomarker analysis using neuroimaging and neuropsychological outcomes from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. This prospective longitudinal study across North America included individuals with normal cognition (n = 90), mild cognitive impairment (n = 130), and AD (n = 59) and began in October 2004, with follow-up ongoing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cerebrospinal fluid VEGF was cross-sectionally related to brain aging outcomes (hippocampal volume, episodic memory, and executive function) using a general linear model and longitudinally using mixed-effects regression. Alzheimer disease biomarker (cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid 42 and total tau)-by-VEGF interactions evaluated the effect of VEGF on brain aging outcomes in the presence of enhanced AD biomarkers. RESULTS: Vascular endothelial growth factor was associated with baseline hippocampal volume (t277 = 2.62; P = .009), longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (t858 = 2.48; P = .01), and longitudinal decline in memory (t1629 = 4.09; P < .001) and executive function (t1616 = 3.00; P = .003). Vascular endothelial growth factor interacted with tau in predicting longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (t845 = 4.17; P < .001), memory decline (t1610 = 2.49; P = .01), and executive function decline (t1597 = 3.71; P < .001). Vascular endothelial growth factor interacted with β-amyloid 42 in predicting longitudinal memory decline (t1618 = -2.53; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Elevated cerebrospinal fluid VEGF was associated with more optimal brain aging in vivo. The neuroprotective effect appeared strongest in the presence of enhanced AD biomarkers, suggesting that VEGF may be particularly beneficial in individuals showing early hallmarks of the AD cascade. Future work should evaluate the interaction between VEGF expression in vitro and pathologic burden to address potential mechanisms.
IMPORTANCE: A subset of older adults present post mortem with Alzheimer disease (AD) pathologic features but without any significant clinical manifestation of dementia. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been implicated in staving off AD-related neurodegeneration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether VEGF levels are associated with brain aging outcomes (hippocampal volume and cognition) and to further evaluate whether VEGF modifies relations between AD biomarkers and brain aging outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Biomarker analysis using neuroimaging and neuropsychological outcomes from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. This prospective longitudinal study across North America included individuals with normal cognition (n = 90), mild cognitive impairment (n = 130), and AD (n = 59) and began in October 2004, with follow-up ongoing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cerebrospinal fluid VEGF was cross-sectionally related to brain aging outcomes (hippocampal volume, episodic memory, and executive function) using a general linear model and longitudinally using mixed-effects regression. Alzheimer disease biomarker (cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid 42 and total tau)-by-VEGF interactions evaluated the effect of VEGF on brain aging outcomes in the presence of enhanced AD biomarkers. RESULTS:Vascular endothelial growth factor was associated with baseline hippocampal volume (t277 = 2.62; P = .009), longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (t858 = 2.48; P = .01), and longitudinal decline in memory (t1629 = 4.09; P < .001) and executive function (t1616 = 3.00; P = .003). Vascular endothelial growth factor interacted with tau in predicting longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (t845 = 4.17; P < .001), memory decline (t1610 = 2.49; P = .01), and executive function decline (t1597 = 3.71; P < .001). Vascular endothelial growth factor interacted with β-amyloid 42 in predicting longitudinal memory decline (t1618 = -2.53; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Elevated cerebrospinal fluid VEGF was associated with more optimal brain aging in vivo. The neuroprotective effect appeared strongest in the presence of enhanced AD biomarkers, suggesting that VEGF may be particularly beneficial in individuals showing early hallmarks of the AD cascade. Future work should evaluate the interaction between VEGF expression in vitro and pathologic burden to address potential mechanisms.
Authors: Laura E Gibbons; Adam C Carle; R Scott Mackin; Danielle Harvey; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Philip Insel; S McKay Curtis; Dan Mungas; Paul K Crane Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: E C Mormino; J T Kluth; C M Madison; G D Rabinovici; S L Baker; B L Miller; R A Koeppe; C A Mathis; M W Weiner; W J Jagust Journal: Brain Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Michal Figurski; Els Coart; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam J Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert A Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: B Oosthuyse; L Moons; E Storkebaum; H Beck; D Nuyens; K Brusselmans; J Van Dorpe; P Hellings; M Gorselink; S Heymans; G Theilmeier; M Dewerchin; V Laudenbach; P Vermylen; H Raat; T Acker; V Vleminckx; L Van Den Bosch; N Cashman; H Fujisawa; M R Drost; R Sciot; F Bruyninckx; D J Hicklin; C Ince; P Gressens; F Lupu; K H Plate; W Robberecht; J M Herbert; D Collen; P Carmeliet Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Sunyoung Lee; Tom T Chen; Chad L Barber; Maria C Jordan; Jared Murdock; Sharina Desai; Napoleone Ferrara; Andras Nagy; Kenneth P Roos; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe Journal: Cell Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Patrick J Smith; James A Blumenthal; Alan L Hinderliter; Lana L Watkins; Benson M Hoffman; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Merle C Hoenig; Gérard N Bischof; Özgür A Onur; Juraj Kukolja; Frank Jessen; Klaus Fliessbach; Bernd Neumaier; Gereon R Fink; Elke Kalbe; Alexander Drzezga; Thilo van Eimeren Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Paulo L Lizano; Jeffrey K Yao; Neeraj Tandon; Suraj Sarvode Mothi; Debra M Montrose; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Antonio M Chiarelli; Mark A Fletcher; Chin Hong Tan; Kathy A Low; Edward L Maclin; Benjamin Zimmerman; Tania Kong; Alexander Gorsuch; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jessica L Montoya; Jennifer Iudicello; Pariya L Fazeli; Suzi Hong; Michael Potter; Ronald J Ellis; Igor Grant; Scott L Letendre; David J Moore Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Christian Lange; Erik Storkebaum; Carmen Ruiz de Almodóvar; Mieke Dewerchin; Peter Carmeliet Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 42.937