| Literature DB >> 25750868 |
On-Yoo Kim1, Yoon-Kyum Shin2, Young Kwon Yoon3, Eu Jeong Ko1, Sung-Rae Cho4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of treadmill walking exercise as a treatment method to improve gait efficiency in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and to determine gait efficiency during overground walking after the treadmill walking exercise.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Efficiency; Exercise; Gait; Walking
Year: 2015 PMID: 25750868 PMCID: PMC4351491 DOI: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Rehabil Med ISSN: 2234-0645
General characteristics of the subjects
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number of subjects.
Experimental group, treadmill walking exercise and conventional physical therapy; control group, conventional physical therapy alone; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure.
Changes in the parameters of energy consumption test during treadmill walking
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
VO2, oxygen uptake per minute; VCO2, carbon dioxide production amount per minute; VE, respiratory volume per minute; O2 rate, oxygen consumption rate; O2 cost, oxygen consumption cost.
*p<0.05.
Changes in parameters of energy consumption test during overground walking
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
VO2, oxygen uptake per minute; VCO2, carbon dioxide production amount per minute; VE, respiratory volume per minute; O2 rate, oxygen consumption rate; O2 cost, oxygen consumption cost.
*p<0.05.
Fig. 1Comparison of ΔO2 rate between experimental and control groups. (A) Difference in post-treatment to pretreatment states (Δ) in the O2 rate (mL/kg·min) after treadmill training had no significant differences in the parameter during treadmill walking between experimental and control groups. (B) The experimental group did not show a significant improvement in the ΔO2 rate during overground walking.
Fig. 2Comparison of ΔO2 cost between experimental and control groups. (A) Difference from post-treatment to pretreatment states (Δ) in the O2 cost (mL/kg·m) after treadmill training had no significant differences in the parameter during treadmill walking between experimental and control groups. (B) However, the experimental group showed significantly lower ΔO2 cost, as compared with the control group during overground walking (*p<0.05).