Literature DB >> 20672964

Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study.

Juan S Uribe1, Nicolas Arredondo, Elias Dakwar, Fernando L Vale.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach is being increasingly employed to treat various spinal disorders. The minimally invasive blunt retroperitoneal and transpsoas dissection poses a risk of injury to major nervous structures. The addition of electrophysiological monitoring potentially decreases the risk of injury to the lumbar plexus. With respect to the use of the direct transpsoas approach, however, there is sparse knowledge regarding the relationship between the retroperitoneum/psoas muscle and the lumbar plexus at each lumbar segment. The authors undertook this anatomical cadaveric dissection study to define the anatomical safe zones relative to the disc spaces for prevention of nerve injuries during the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach.
METHODS: Twenty lumbar segments were dissected and studied. The relationship between the retroperitoneum, psoas muscle, and the lumbar plexus was analyzed. The area between the anterior and posterior edges of the vertebral body (VB) was divided into 4 equal zones. Radiopaque markers were placed in each disc space at the midpoint of Zone III (middle posterior quarter). At each segment, the psoas muscle, lumbar plexus, and nerve roots were dissected. The distribution of the lumbar plexus with reference to the markers at each lumbar segment was analyzed.
RESULTS: All parts of the lumbar plexus, including nerve roots, were found within the substance of the psoas muscle dorsal to the posterior fourth of the VB (Zone IV). No Zone III marker was posterior to any part of the lumbar plexus with the exception of the genitofemoral nerve. The genitofemoral nerve travels obliquely in the substance of the psoas muscle from its origin to its innervations. It emerges superficially and anterior from the medial border of the psoas at the L3-4 level and courses along the anterior medial fourth of the L-4 and L-5 VBs (Zone I). The nerves of the plexus that originate at the upper lumbar segments emerge from the lateral border of the psoas major and cross obliquely into the retroperitoneum in front of the quadratus lumborum and the iliacus muscles to the iliac crest.
CONCLUSIONS: With respect to prevention of direct nerve injury, the safe anatomical zones at the disc spaces from L1-2 to L3-4 are at the middle posterior quarter of the VB (midpoint of Zone III) and the safe anatomical zone at the L4-5 disc space is at the midpoint of the VB (Zone II-Zone III demarcation). There is risk of direct injury to the genitofemoral nerve in Zone II at the L2-3 space and in Zone I at the lower lumbar levels L3-4 and L4-5. There is also a potential risk of injury to the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves in the retroperitoneal space where they travel obliquely, inferiorly, and anteriorly to the reach the iliac crest and the abdominal wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20672964     DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  58 in total

1.  The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach.

Authors:  Patrick Guérin; Ibrahim Obeid; Anouar Bourghli; Thibault Masquefa; Stéphane Luc; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Re: Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Justin W Silverstein
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The surgical vascular anatomy of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody approach: a cadaveric and radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Alkadhim; Carmine Zoccali; Salman Abbasifard; Mauricio J Avila; Apar S Patel; Kamran Sattarov; Christina M Walter; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the correction of spondylolisthesis and adult degenerative scoliosis in high-risk patients: early radiographic results and complications.

Authors:  Brad Waddell; David Briski; Rabah Qadir; Gustavo Godoy; Allison Howard Houston; Ernest Rudman; Joseph Zavatsky
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Bowel injury in lumbar spine surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ioannis Siasios; Kunal Vakharia; Asham Khan; Joshua E Meyers; Samantha Yavorek; John Pollina; Vassilios Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

6.  Safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a morphometric study.

Authors:  Patrick Guérin; Ibrahim Obeid; Olivier Gille; Anouar Bourghli; Stéphane Luc; Vincent Pointillart; Jean Christophe Cursolle; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Robert E Isaacs; Jim A Youssef; Kaveh Khajavi; Jeffrey R Balzer; Adam S Kanter; Fabrice A Küelling; Mark D Peterson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Neural anatomy, neuromonitoring and related complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: video lecture.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Femoral nerve and lumbar plexus injury after minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: electrodiagnostic prognostic indicators and a roadmap to recovery.

Authors:  Naomi A Abel; Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.