| Literature DB >> 25747876 |
Clark W Bird1, Felicha T Candelaria-Cook1, Christy M Magcalas1, Suzy Davies2, C Fernando Valenzuela2, Daniel D Savage2, Derek A Hamilton3.
Abstract
Prenatal exposure to alcohol affects the expression and function of glutamatergic neurotransmitter receptors in diverse brain regions. The present study was undertaken to fill a current gap in knowledge regarding the regional specificity of ethanol-related alterations in glutamatergic receptors in the frontal cortex. We quantified subregional expression and function of glutamatergic neurotransmitter receptors (AMPARs, NMDARs, GluN2B-containing NMDARs, mGluR1s, and mGluR5s) by radioligand binding in the agranular insular cortex (AID), lateral orbital area (LO), prelimbic cortex (PrL) and primary motor cortex (M1) of adult rats exposed to moderate levels of ethanol during prenatal development. Increased expression of GluN2B-containing NMDARs was observed in AID of ethanol-exposed rats compared to modest reductions in other regions. We subsequently performed slice electrophysiology measurements in a whole-cell patch-clamp preparation to quantify the sensitivity of evoked NMDAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in layer II/III pyramidal neurons of AID to the GluN2B negative allosteric modulator ifenprodil. Consistent with increased GluN2B expression, ifenprodil caused a greater reduction in NMDAR-mediated EPSCs from prenatal alcohol-exposed rats than saccharin-exposed control animals. No alterations in AMPAR-mediated EPSCs or the ratio of AMPARs/NMDARs were observed. Together, these data indicate that moderate prenatal alcohol exposure has a significant and lasting impact on GluN2B-containing receptors in AID, which could help to explain ethanol-related alterations in learning and behaviors that depend on this region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25747876 PMCID: PMC4351952 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effect of prenatal ethanol exposure on the density of various glutamate receptor subtypes in frontal cortex.
| AID | LO | PrL | M1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tritiated Radioligand | SAC | ETOH | SAC | ETOH | SAC | ETOH | SAC | ETOH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data are the mean (SEM) specific binding, expressed as femtomoles bound / 105 μm2, for each radioligand for the total sample (in bold, N = 14) and separately for males (n = 7 per prenatal treatment) and females (n = 7 per prenatal treatment). R = Region, PT = Prenatal Treatment, S = Sex.
* indicates a significant effect at p < 0.05; See Fig. 1D for additional data relevant to characterization of the PTxR interaction for specific [3H]-ifenprodil binding.
Fig 1Sampled brain areas for autoradiography densitometry analysis and % change in [3H]-ifenprodil binding.
A) [3H]-Ifenprodil binding in a coronal section of rat brain corresponding to Plate #8 (Bregma + 4.2 mm) in the stereotaxic atlas of Paxinos and Watson [49]. Densitometry of [3H]-ifenprodil binding was measured in cortical layers I-III in prelimbic cortex (PrL), primary motor cortex (M1), lateral orbital cortex (LO), and agranular insular cortex (AID). The image is overlaid with boundaries of sampled regions. B) Image of non-specific [3H]-ifenprodil binding. C) Plate #8 from the stereotaxic atlas of Paxinos and Watson [49] (Reprinted with permission from Elsevier). D) Mean (+SEM) percent change in [3H]-ifenprodil binding in AID, LO, PrL, and M1 are shown. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant (p < 0.05) prenatal treatment X region interaction for [3H]-ifenprodil binding.
Effects of daily four-hour consumption of 5% ethanol on rat dams and their offspring.
| Saccharin Control | 5% Ethanol | |
|---|---|---|
|
| NA | 2.04(0.08) n = 32 |
| (grams EtOH consumed/kg body weight/day) | ||
| Daily four-hour ethanol consumption: Week 1 | NA | 1.73(0.09) n = 32 |
| Daily four-hour ethanol consumption: Week 2 | NA | 2.07(0.09) n = 32 |
| Daily four-hour ethanol consumption: Week 3 | NA | 2.04(0.08) n = 32 |
|
| NA | 60.8(5.8) n = 62 |
| (mg EtOH/dL serum, 45 minutes into drinking) | ||
|
| 107(4) n = 32 | 104(5) n = 32 |
| (grams increase in body weight through GD20) | ||
|
| 12.5(0.15) n = 32 | 12.2(0.29) n = 32 |
| (number of live fetal pups/litter) | ||
|
| 6.17(0.13) n = 41 | 6.13(0.11) n = 42 |
| (grams) |
Data are mean (SEM) with group sample size.
Characteristics of average sEPSC and mEPSC waveforms fit with a dual exponent function (A) and multiplicity ratio data (B).
| sEPSC | mEPSC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A) | SAC | PAE | SAC | PAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SAC | PAE | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
Data are mean (SEM) for each characteristic for the total sample (N = 10 animals per prenatal treatment) and separately for males (n = 5 animals per prenatal treatment) and females (n = 5 per prenatal treatment). There were no significant main effects of prenatal treatment or prenatal treatment X sex interactions at p < 0.05.
*indicates a significant effect at p<0.05 for sex main effects for either the sEPSC[s] or mEPSC[m].
** p<0.01
***p<0.001
AMPA/NMDA ratios.
| SAC | PAE | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data presented are mean (SEM) AMPA/NMDA ratios for the total sample (N = 10 animals per prenatal treatment) and separately for males (n = 5 per prenatal treatment) and females (n = 5 per prenatal treatment).