Vasileios Boulougouris1, Jeffrey W Dalley, Trevor W Robbins. 1. Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute (BCNI) and the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK. vb257@cam.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the neural correlates of reversal learning are localised to the orbitofrontal cortex whereas studies on the contribution of the medial prefrontal cortex to this capacity have produced equivocal results. This study examines the behavioural effects of selective lesions centred on orbitofrontal, infralimbic and prelimbic cortex on serial spatial reversal learning in the rat. METHODS: Rats were trained on a novel instrumental two-lever spatial discrimination and reversal learning task, measuring both 'cognitive flexibility' and constituent processes including response inhibition. Both levers were presented, only one of which was reinforced. The rat was required to respond on the reinforced lever under a fixed ratio 3 schedule of reinforcement. Following attainment of criterion, a series of reversals was presented. RESULTS: Bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex did not affect retention of a preoperatively acquired spatial discrimination but did impair reversal learning. This deficit manifested as increased perseverative responding on the previously correct lever. Although impairments were evident during reversal 1, OFC-lesioned animals performed significantly better than controls on reversal 2. There were no significant effects of infralimbic and prelimbic lesions on the retention of a spatial discrimination or reversal learning. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the orbitofrontal cortex is critical for flexible responding in serial spatial reversal learning. The present findings may be relevant to deficits in reversal learning and response inhibition in such neuropsychiatric disorders as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the neural correlates of reversal learning are localised to the orbitofrontal cortex whereas studies on the contribution of the medial prefrontal cortex to this capacity have produced equivocal results. This study examines the behavioural effects of selective lesions centred on orbitofrontal, infralimbic and prelimbic cortex on serial spatial reversal learning in the rat. METHODS: Rats were trained on a novel instrumental two-lever spatial discrimination and reversal learning task, measuring both 'cognitive flexibility' and constituent processes including response inhibition. Both levers were presented, only one of which was reinforced. The rat was required to respond on the reinforced lever under a fixed ratio 3 schedule of reinforcement. Following attainment of criterion, a series of reversals was presented. RESULTS: Bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex did not affect retention of a preoperatively acquired spatial discrimination but did impair reversal learning. This deficit manifested as increased perseverative responding on the previously correct lever. Although impairments were evident during reversal 1, OFC-lesioned animals performed significantly better than controls on reversal 2. There were no significant effects of infralimbic and prelimbic lesions on the retention of a spatial discrimination or reversal learning. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the orbitofrontal cortex is critical for flexible responding in serial spatial reversal learning. The present findings may be relevant to deficits in reversal learning and response inhibition in such neuropsychiatric disorders as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Authors: Shannon L Gourley; Anni S Lee; Jessica L Howell; Christopher Pittenger; Jane R Taylor Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2010-10-12 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Fiona D Zeeb; P J J Baarendse; L J M J Vanderschuren; Catharine A Winstanley Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Dilja D Krueger; Jessica L Howell; Heyman Oo; Peter Olausson; Jane R Taylor; Angus C Nairn Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Kathleen M Kantak; Nicole Barlow; David H Tassin; Madeline F Brisotti; Chloe J Jordan Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jared W Young; J David Jentsch; Timothy J Bussey; Tanya L Wallace; Daniel M Hutcheson Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 8.989