Arlene S Ash1, Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers2, David C Hoaglin1, Kaare Christensen3, Hua Fang1, Thomas T Perls4. 1. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester. 2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester. aimee.kroll@umassmed.edu. 3. Departments of Clinical Genetics and Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, The Danish Aging Research Center, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. 4. Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Long Life Family Study (LLFS) is a multicenter longitudinal study of exceptional survival among members of long-lived sibships (probands), their offspring, and spouses of either group. For these four "roles", we asked: Does membership in a long-lived family protect against disease? METHODS: We used 2008-2010 Beneficiary Annual Summary Files from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to compare prevalences of 17 conditions among 781 LLFS participants in Medicare with those of 3,227 non-LLFS matches from the general Medicare population. Analyses accounted for nesting within LLFS families. RESULTS: Seven conditions were significantly less common among LLFS probands than their matches: Alzheimer's, hip fracture, diabetes, depression, prostate cancer, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Four diseases not strongly linked to mortality (arthritis, cataract, osteoporosis, glaucoma) were significantly more common for LLFS probands. Despite fewer people and less disease in those roles, LLFS offspring and LLFS spouses of either generation also had significantly lower risk for Alzheimer's, diabetes, and heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Common, severe mortality-associated diseases are less prevalent among LLFS probands and their offspring than in the general population of aging Americans. Quality-of-life-limiting diseases such as arthritis and cataract are more prevalent, potentially through more diagnosing of milder forms in otherwise healthy and active individuals. LLFS spouses are also relatively healthy. As the younger cohorts age into Medicare and develop more conditions, it will be important to see whether these tentative findings strengthen.
BACKGROUND: The Long Life Family Study (LLFS) is a multicenter longitudinal study of exceptional survival among members of long-lived sibships (probands), their offspring, and spouses of either group. For these four "roles", we asked: Does membership in a long-lived family protect against disease? METHODS: We used 2008-2010 Beneficiary Annual Summary Files from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to compare prevalences of 17 conditions among 781 LLFS participants in Medicare with those of 3,227 non-LLFS matches from the general Medicare population. Analyses accounted for nesting within LLFS families. RESULTS: Seven conditions were significantly less common among LLFS probands than their matches: Alzheimer's, hip fracture, diabetes, depression, prostate cancer, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Four diseases not strongly linked to mortality (arthritis, cataract, osteoporosis, glaucoma) were significantly more common for LLFS probands. Despite fewer people and less disease in those roles, LLFS offspring and LLFS spouses of either generation also had significantly lower risk for Alzheimer's, diabetes, and heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Common, severe mortality-associated diseases are less prevalent among LLFS probands and their offspring than in the general population of aging Americans. Quality-of-life-limiting diseases such as arthritis and cataract are more prevalent, potentially through more diagnosing of milder forms in otherwise healthy and active individuals. LLFS spouses are also relatively healthy. As the younger cohorts age into Medicare and develop more conditions, it will be important to see whether these tentative findings strengthen.
Authors: T Perls; M Shea-Drinkwater; J Bowen-Flynn; S B Ridge; S Kang; E Joyce; M Daly; S J Brewster; L Kunkel; A A Puca Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Paola Sebastiani; Evan C Hadley; Michael Province; Kaare Christensen; Winifred Rossi; Thomas T Perls; Arlene S Ash Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: P Gueresi; R Miglio; D Monti; D Mari; P Sansoni; C Caruso; E Bonafede; L Bucci; E Cevenini; R Ostan; M G Palmas; E Pini; M Scurti; C Franceschi Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2013-02-10 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Ambarish Dutta; William Henley; Jean-Marie Robine; Kenneth M Langa; Robert B Wallace; David Melzer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Dellara F Terry; Jane C Evans; Michael J Pencina; Joanne M Murabito; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Daniel Levy; Ralph B D'Agostino; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-12
Authors: Emily R Adams; Vikki G Nolan; Stacy L Andersen; Thomas T Perls; Dellara F Terry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jacob vB Hjelmborg; Ivan Iachine; Axel Skytthe; James W Vaupel; Matt McGue; Markku Koskenvuo; Jaakko Kaprio; Nancy L Pedersen; Kaare Christensen Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2006-02-04 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Anne B Newman; Nancy W Glynn; Christopher A Taylor; Paola Sebastiani; Thomas T Perls; Richard Mayeux; Kaare Christensen; Joseph M Zmuda; Sandra Barral; Joseph H Lee; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jeremy D Walston; Anatoli I Yashin; Evan Hadley Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.682
Authors: Paola Sebastiani; Nadia Solovieff; Andrew T Dewan; Kyle M Walsh; Annibale Puca; Stephen W Hartley; Efthymia Melista; Stacy Andersen; Daniel A Dworkis; Jemma B Wilk; Richard H Myers; Martin H Steinberg; Monty Montano; Clinton T Baldwin; Josephine Hoh; Thomas T Perls Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zhengdong D Zhang; Sofiya Milman; Jhih-Rong Lin; Shayne Wierbowski; Haiyuan Yu; Nir Barzilai; Vera Gorbunova; Warren C Ladiges; Laura J Niedernhofer; Yousin Suh; Paul D Robbins; Jan Vijg Journal: Nat Metab Date: 2020-07-27
Authors: Jacob K Pedersen; Irma T Elo; Nicole Schupf; Thomas T Perls; Eric Stallard; Anatoliy I Yashin; Kaare Christensen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: William B Zhang; Drew B Sinha; William E Pittman; Erik Hvatum; Nicholas Stroustrup; Zachary Pincus Journal: Cell Syst Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 10.304
Authors: Anatoliy I Yashin; Konstantin G Arbeev; Deqing Wu; Liubov S Arbeeva; Olivia Bagley; Eric Stallard; Alexander M Kulminski; Igor Akushevich; Fang Fang; Mary K Wojczynski; Kaare Christensen; Anne B Newman; Robert M Boudreau; Michael A Province; Stephen Thielke; Thomas T Perls; Ping An; Irma Elo; Svetlana V Ukraintseva Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Stacy L Andersen; Mengtian Du; Stephanie Cosentino; Nicole Schupf; Andrea L Rosso; Thomas T Perls; Paola Sebastiani Journal: Gerontology Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 5.597
Authors: Sandaly O S Pacheco; Fabio J Pacheco; Gimena M J Zapata; Julieta M E Garcia; Carlos A Previale; Héctor E Cura; Winston J Craig Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Niels van den Berg; Mar Rodríguez-Girondo; Anton J M de Craen; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat; Marian Beekman; P Eline Slagboom Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 6.053