Literature DB >> 25744328

Tissue reaction after intrastromal corneal ring implantation in an experimental animal model.

Lucía Ibares-Frías1, Patricia Gallego, Roberto Cantalapiedra-Rodríguez, María Cruz Valsero, Santiago Mar, Jesús Merayo-Lloves, María Carmen Martínez-García.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal wound healing in the hen animal model after additive surgery with an intracorneal ring segment (ICRS).
METHODS: We implanted one ICRS in each eye of 76 hens. In control group 1 (n = 22 hens), the stromal channel was prepared but no ICRS was inserted. In control group 2 (n = 2 hens), no surgery was performed. Animals were randomly separated into groups and euthanized after clinical follow-up of 4 and 12 hours, 1, 2, 3, and 7 days, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months. Corneas were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Apoptosis was measured by terminal uridine nick end-labeling assays. Cell proliferation and myofibroblast-like differentiation were assayed by BrdU and α-smooth muscle actin immunofluorescence microscopy. Stromal matrix changes were documented by electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Epithelial and stromal cell apoptosis around the ICRS-implanted and control group 1 eyes peaked at 12 hours, but continued for 72 hours. In ICRS-implanted eyes, epithelial and stromal proliferation was present at 12 and 24 hours, respectively, and peaked at 7 days and 72 hours, respectively. Some proliferation in the ICRS-implanted group continued through the 6-month follow-up, and myofibroblast-like cells differentiated one to three months after ICRS implantation. The segments rotated within the stroma as the limbal inferior angle approached the epithelium.
CONCLUSIONS: Wound healing after ICRS implantation in hen corneas was similar to that of other corneal surgical wounds in stages. However, there were some specific features related to the small size of the epithelial wound and the device permanently implanted inside the cornea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25744328     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-2959-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  44 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics of lamellar channel deposits after implantation of intacs.

Authors:  J Ruckhofer; M D Twa; D J Schanzlin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 2.  Keratoconus: a review.

Authors:  Miguel Romero-Jiménez; Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  Wound healing in the cornea: a review of refractive surgery complications and new prospects for therapy.

Authors:  Marcelo V Netto; Rajiv R Mohan; Renato Ambrósio; Audrey E K Hutcheon; James D Zieske; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Wound healing following refractive surgery in hens.

Authors:  M C Martínez-García; J Merayo-Llovés; T Blanco-Mezquita; S Mar-Sardaña
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Measurement of depth of Intacs implanted via femtosecond laser using Pentacam.

Authors:  Günhal Kamburoglu; Aylin Ertan; Osman Saraçbasi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Quantitative OCT-based longitudinal evaluation of intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus.

Authors:  Pablo Pérez-Merino; Sergio Ortiz; Nicolas Alejandre; Ignacio Jiménez-Alfaro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The progression of haze formation in rabbit corneas following phototherapeutic keratectomy.

Authors:  Daniel J Gibson; Sonal S Tuli; Gregory S Schultz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 8.  The corneal epithelial basement membrane: structure, function, and disease.

Authors:  André A M Torricelli; Vivek Singh; Marcony R Santhiago; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Two-year outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segments for the correction of myopia.

Authors:  D J Schanzlin; R L Abbott; P A Asbell; K K Assil; T E Burris; D S Durrie; B D Fouraker; R L Lindstrom; J E McDonald; S M Verity; G O Waring
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Quantitative OCT-based corneal topography in keratoconus with intracorneal ring segments.

Authors:  Sergio Ortiz; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Nicolas Alejandre; E Gambra; I Jimenez-Alfaro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  2 in total

1.  Indications and visual outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in a large patient series.

Authors:  Taíse Tognon; Mauro Campos; João Paulo Wengrzynovski; Kleyton Arlindo Barella; Adriano Pasqualotti; Luiz Antônio de Brito Martins; Adriana Dos Santos Forseto; Luciene Barbosa de Sousa
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Corneal Biomechanics After Intrastromal Ring Surgery: Optomechanical In Silico Assessment.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Ariza-Gracia; Julio Flecha-Lescún; Philippe Büchler; Begoña Calvo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.283

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.