Literature DB >> 25743419

Comparison of different sampling types across the rearing period in broiler flocks for isolation of Campylobacter spp.

S Ingresa-Capaccioni1, S González-Bodí2, E Jiménez-Trigos3, F Marco-Jiménez3, P Catalá4, S Vega2, C Marin2.   

Abstract

Campylobacter is the most common bacterial cause of human gastrointestinal disease in most developed countries. It is generally accepted that poultry products are a significant source of foodborne Campylobacter infections in humans. Assessing the effectiveness of any potential intervention at farm level requires monitoring of the Campylobacter status of broiler flocks, using appropriate sampling methods. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the sample type across the rearing period for the detection of Campylobacter spp. at farm level. During this study, 21 commercial broiler farms were intensively sampled. Each farm was visited and sampled at different times during the rearing period (d 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42). On the first day of rearing, the status of the house and the day-old flock was evaluated, and environmental and cecal samples were collected. During rearing, 4 different sample types were collected: feces with sock swabs (sock swabs), feces directly from the litter (feces), cloacal swabs, and cecal content. All samples were analyzed according to ISO 10272-1:2006 (Annex E) and also by direct culture. The results of this study showed that Campylobacter spp. were detected in all of the sample types on d 14 of rearing. From this point on, the detection increased significantly, with a maximum detection rate by the end of rearing, regardless of the sample type. All samples that were negative upon direct culture were also negative after pre-enrichment. At the end of rearing, the percentage of samples positive for Campylobacter spp. was 71.4% for cecal samples, 61.9% for cloacal swabs, 45.2% for sock swabs, and 69.1% for fecal samples. C. jejuni was detected in all the sample types, with positive rates ranging from 67.1 to 76.0% for cecal samples and cloacal content, respectively. Cecal samples, cloacal swabs, and fecal samples cultured by direct plating onto modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) without pre-enrichment have the same sensitivity for detection of Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks independent of the day of rearing.
© 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; broiler; sample type

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25743419     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Campylobacter spp. and bacteriophages from broiler chickens: Characterization of antibiotic susceptibility profiles and lytic bacteriophages.

Authors:  Anna Nowaczek; Renata Urban-Chmiel; Marta Dec; Andrzej Puchalski; Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak; Agnieszka Marek; Ewelina Pyzik
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Investigation of Campylobacter colonization in three Australian commercial free-range broiler farms.

Authors:  Pongthorn Pumtang-On; Timothy J Mahony; Rodney A Hill; Anthony Pavic; Thiru Vanniasinkam
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Molecular Characterization of Campylobacter Isolated from Broilers and Broiler Meat Raised without Antibiotics.

Authors:  Sabin Poudel; Tianmin Li; Saijuan Chen; Xue Zhang; Wen-Hsing Cheng; Anuraj T Sukumaran; Aaron S Kiess; Li Zhang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  Rapid Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION Sequencing Workflow for Campylobacter jejuni Identification in Broilers on Site-A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Clara Marin; Francisco Marco-Jiménez; Llucia Martínez-Priego; Griselda De Marco-Romero; Vicente Soriano-Chirona; Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque; Giuseppe D'Auria
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacer jejuni on Swine Processing at a Slaughterhouse in Eastern Spain.

Authors:  Clara Marin; Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque; Judith Moreno-Moliner; Sandra Sevilla-Navarro; Estefania Montero; Mᵃ Carmen Chinillac; Jaume Jordá; Santiago Vega
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Sources of contamination, prevalence, and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from turkeys.

Authors:  Radia Bouhamed; Leila Bouayad; Sara Messad; Safia Zenia; Malek Naïm; Taha-Mossadak Hamdi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-08-07

7.  Genotyping and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from poultry breeders and their progeny in Eastern Spain.

Authors:  C Marin; S Sevilla-Navarro; R Lonjedo; P Catalá-Gregori; M A Ferrús; S Vega; A Jiménez-Belenguer
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.