Literature DB >> 25742876

Sensitivity analysis of a novel five-degrees-of-freedom user command controller in people with spinal cord injury and non-injured for full upper extremity neuroprosthesis, wearable powered orthoses and prosthetics.

Timothy R D Scott1, Veronica A Vare.   

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis for a user command controller monitoring head position for artificial control of the proximal upper limb was performed. The controller was evaluated by having subjects complete target matching tasks manipulating a simulated on-screen hand representation to investigate the effects of target location and target speed on performance. Sixteen subjects took part in the study, 11 of whom had sustained cervical spinal cord injuries. The subjects were able to control the on-screen hand with overall low sensitivity of performance with the controller to target position in its five-degrees-of-freedom. The optimal speed was found to be a compromise between low speed and high accuracy but longer completion time and fast speed for short completion time with lower accuracy. The results demonstrated the robustness of the controller across a population of non-injured subjects and those with tetraplegia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742876     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1255-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  15 in total

1.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Neck range of motion and use of computer head controls.

Authors:  Edmund F LoPresti; David M Brienza; Jennifer Angelo; Lars Gilbertson
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2003 May-Jun

3.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Risk sensitivity in a motor task with speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Arne J Nagengast; Daniel A Braun; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Tri-state myoelectric control of bilateral upper extremity neuroprostheses for tetraplegic individuals.

Authors:  T R Scott; P H Peckham; K L Kilgore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1996-12

6.  Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?

Authors:  J Decety; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Olivier White; Darren Newman; Níall Lally
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Upper extremity neuroprostheses using functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T R Scott; P H Peckham; M W Keith
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Neurol       Date:  1995-04

9.  Left hand, but not right hand, reaching is sensitive to visual context.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Rick Müskens; Susan Hoonhorst; Jay Pratt; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Learning optimal adaptation strategies in unpredictable motor tasks.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.