Literature DB >> 25742650

p53 Status correlates with the risk of recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancers treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin: a meta-analysis.

Xiaofeng Zhou1, Guan Zhang2, Ye Tian1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Published studies have yielded inconsistent results on the relationship between p53 status and the prognosis of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical therapy. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of p53 in NMIBC treated with BCG.
METHODS: We systematically searched for relevant literature in PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, and Chinese Wanfang databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined as the effect size (ES) across studies for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, consisting of 1,049 participants, met the criteria. Overall, there was no clear relationship between p53 status and RFS or PFS for NMIBC patients treated with BCG (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.91-2.16; HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.90-2.09, respectively). Obvious heterogeneity was observed across the studies (I2 = 69.5%, P = 0.001; I2 = 44.7%, P = 0.081, respectively). In stratified analysis by region, p53 overexpression was a predictor of poor RFS in Asian populations (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.08-2.27). In addition, after excluding the studies that possibly contributed to the heterogeneity by the Galbraith plot, the overall association for RFS became statistically significant (HR: 1.38 95% CI: 1.08-1.77) without evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.499).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that p53 overexpression in NMIBC patients treated with BCG may be associated with RFS, especially in Asian populations. Because of the heterogeneity and other limitations, further studies with rigid criteria and large populations are still warranted to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742650      PMCID: PMC4351250          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Bladder cancer ranks ninth in the worldwide cancer incidence [1]. There were a total of 386,300 new cases and 150,200 deaths from bladder cancer occurred in 2008 [2]. Among these, approximately 70% of bladder tumors are non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) at the time of presentation [3]. Recently, after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURB), adjuvant intravesical treatment with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) was selected as the first-line therapy for patients with NMIBC. However, predicting which patients are destined to fail BCG treatment is still a very difficult task [4]. Molecular tumor markers hold considerable promise for accurately predicting the recurrence and progression of NMIBC patients treated with BCG intravesical therapy. Deregulation of the cell-cycle machinery is common in bladder cancer, involving alterations in various proteins such as cyclin D1, Rb, p16, p21, p27, and p53 [5,6]. The value of pretreatment p53 overexpression on the prognosis of NMIBC patients treated with BCG has been widely studied and discussed. As a result, most of reports are in consensus that p53 is not associated with the prognosis [7-11]. However, several studies have suggested different results. For example, three independent studies reported a positive association between strong p53 overexpression and the risk of recurrence in NMIBC patients treated with intravesical BCG [12-14], whereas Oderda et al.’ study suggested a negative association between them [15]. In addition, studies conducted by Lopez-Beltran et al. and Lacombe et al. indicated that increased p53 expression was associated with the risk of progression [16,17]. Meta-analysis is a useful method for overcoming the small sample size problem of individual studies and enhancing the low statistical power [18,19]. Considering the inconsistent results of published articles, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of all published studies to determine the value of p53 as a prognostic marker for NMIBC patients treated with BCG intravesical instillations.

Methods

Search strategy

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [20] (S1 PRISMA Checklist). Published articles studying the prognostic value of p53 in NMIBC treated with BCG were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, and Chinese Wanfang databases with the following search terms: “bladder cancer or bladder carcinoma or bladder neoplasm or bladder tumor”, “Bacillus Calmette–Guérin or BCG”, and “p53 or TP53”. The final search was conducted on November 30, 2014. The references of the retrieved articles and reviews were also screened for additional relevant studies. The eligible publications were selected by two reviewers, and controversial articles were adjudicated by a third reviewer.

Inclusion criteria

The following criteria were applied to identify the eligible articles: (a) to evaluate the relationship between p53 status and the prognosis of NMIBC patients treated with BCG; (b) to detect p53 status in the primary tumor tissues using immunohistochemistry (IHC); (c) to provide adequate data to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs); and (d) publications in English or Chinese. For overlapping studies, the most recent and detailed study was eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis.

Data extraction

According to the inclusion criteria listed above, two reviewers independently extracted the following information: the first author’s surname, publication year, country in which the study was conducted, number of patients analyzed, age of the patients, follow-up time, disease stage, cut-off value, and prognostic data. Disagreement was resolved by a consensus discussion among all authors.

Statistical methods

The impact of p53 expression on survival was quantified with the combined HRs and 95% CIs. The HR and 95% CI of each study were directly extracted from each publication. If not directly available, they were calculated from the available data in the articles using methods described by Parmar et al. [21]. In this meta-analysis, the DerSimonian–Laird random-effect model [22] was applied, which considered both within-study and between-study variation. By convention, an HR > 1 corresponded to a poor outcome for increased p53, while HR < 1 indicated a favorable prognosis. The impact of increased p53 expression on survival was considered statistically significant if the 95% CI did not exceed 1. Subgroup analyses by different analytical methods (region, sample size, follow-up time, stage, cut-off, publication year, and patient age) were performed. We also performed a cumulative meta-analysis by sorting the studies according to the publication year [23]. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed by the Chi-square-based Q test and I2 statistic [24]. A P value < 0.10 was considered statistically significant. The value of I2 was used to evaluate the degree of heterogeneity (no heterogeneity: I2 < 25%; moderate heterogeneity: I2 = 25–50%; and large or extreme heterogeneity: I2 > 50%). In addition, the Galbraith plot was used to detect the possible sources of heterogeneity [25], and a re-analysis was conducted after excluding the studies that possibly contributed to the heterogeneity. Additionally, residual maximum likelihood (REML)-based random-effects meta-regression analysis was used to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity [26,27].

Estimation of the publication bias

The potential publication bias was estimated using Begg’s funnel plot [28], Egger’s test [29], and the trim-and-fill method [30]. P < 0.05 was considered representative of a statistically significant publication bias. All of the statistical analyses were performed with STATA 11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas USA) using two-sided P values.

Results

Study selection

As shown in Fig. 1, a total of 187 articles were identified using the search strategy as described above. After carefully reading the titles and abstracts, 166 studies that were not relevant to our aim were excluded. Upon further review of the remaining 21 articles, 3 were excluded because not all of the included patients were treated with BCG, 3 were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to calculate the HR, 3 were excluded because they did not include survival analysis, and 1 was excluded because it had data that overlapped with other studies. After selection, a total of 11 articles were finally included in the evaluation of the prognostic value of p53 status in NMIBC patients treated with BCG.
Fig 1

Flowchart of study selection.

Characteristics of the eligible studies

The clinical features of these 11 eligible studies are summarized in Table 1. These studies were published between 1996 and 2013. Three articles evaluated patients from Korea, 2 from Italy, 2 from France, 1 from the USA, 1 from Singapore, 1 from Spain, and 1 from two countries (Netherlands and Canada). The total number of patients was 1,049, with study sample sizes ranging from 27 to 275 patients. The follow-up period was at least 24 months and the follow-up period for 5 studies was at least 60 months. The definition of the cut-off value for high p53 expression was varied and 6 studies used the percentage of stained cells not less than 20%. The HRs and 95% CIs were recorded for each study using reported data or the methods described above. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was reported in 9 studies and progression-free survival (PFS) reported in 8 studies.
Table 1

Main characteristics of all studies included in this meta-analysis.

StudyYearCountryNo. of PatientsAge (years)Follow up (months)StageCut offSurvival analysis
Oderda et al2013Italy19273.2 (SD 11.9)100 (2–229)All NMIBC20%RFS,PFS
Park et al2013Korea6166 (31–85)60 (6–217)T1G310%RFS,PFS
van Rhijn et al2012Netherlands,Canada12968.8 (SD 9.9)78 (39.6–110.4)T110%RFS,PFS
Oh et al2010Korea27563.950.4 (0–115.2)All NMIBC60%RFS
Cormio et al2009Italy2769 (57–81)60 (15–135)T1G320%RFS,PFS
Esuvaranathan et al2007Singapore5363.554 (6–114)All NMIBCScore > 3RFS,PFS
Lopez-Beltran et al2004Spain5169.96 (49–89)63.82 (60–144)T1G36%PFS
Saint et al2004France10264.6 (36.8–88)40 (4.4–164.5)All NMIBC20%RFS
Peyromaure et al2002France2972.2 (52–87)36.7 (1–108)T1G320%RFS,PFS
Lee et al1997Korea3257.1 (30–81)All > 24T1G2–320%RFS
Lacombe et al1996USA9865 (28–83)44 (2–66)All NMIBC20%PFS

No., number; NMIBC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; RFS, recurrence-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

No., number; NMIBC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; RFS, recurrence-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

Impact of p53 expression on RFS

Nine articles contained information on the correlation between p53 expression and RFS in NMIBC patients treated with BCG. The combined data from all these studies suggested that p53 overexpression was not statistically associated with RFS with a pooled HR estimate of 1.40 (95% CI: 0.91–2.16) (Fig. 2A). Obvious heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 69.5%, P = 0.001). However, subgroup analysis by region showed that increased p53 expression was significantly correlated with RFS in Asian populations (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.08–2.27), and there was no significant heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 10.7%, P = 0.339). Likewise, stratification analysis by patient age indicated that p53 was also significantly associated with RFS in patients ≤ 65 years old (HR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.16–5.12), which had significant heterogeneity (I2 = 70.2%, P = 0.018) (Table 2)
Fig 2

Forest plots of HRs estimated for the relationship between p53 expression and RFS (A) or PFS (B) among NMIBC patients treated with BCG.

Table 2

Subgroup results of RFS and heterogeneity test.

Heterogeneity test
VariablesStudy numberHR (95% CI)Q P I2 (%)
Total RFS91.40 (0.91–2.16)26.200.00169.5
Region
 Asian41.57 (1.08–2.27)3.360.33910.7
 Caucasian51.28 (0.62–2.67)19.990.00180.0
Sample size
 ≥ 10041.50 (0.76–2.95)21.26< 0.00185.9
 < 10051.33 (0.78–2.24)4.890.29918.2
Follow-up (months)
 ≥ 6040.94 (0.61–1.46)5.300.15143.4
 < 6041.75 (0.81–3.75)10.430.01571.2
Stage
 All NMIBC41.54 (0.67–3.52)21.26< 0.00185.9
 T1G330.98 (0.52–1.83)0.330.8490.0
Cut-off
 20%51.62 (0.58–4.50)24.59< 0.00183.7
 Others41.37 (1.05–1.78)0.700.8720.0
Publication year
 ≥ 200951.09(0.73–1.61)9.180.05756.4
 < 200942.20(0.81–5.94)11.140.01173.1
Patient age (years)
 > 6550.92(0.64–1.33)5.450.24526.6
 ≤ 6542.43(1.16–5.12)10.060.01870.2

Impact of p53 expression on PFS

The relationship between p53 expression and PFS in NMIBC patients treated with BCG is illustrated in Fig. 2B. The pooled HR for all 8 articles was 1.37 (95% CI: 0.90–2.09), which had significant heterogeneity (I2 = 44.7%, P = 0.081). In the stratified analyses by the region, sample size, follow-up time, stage, cut-off, publication year, and patient age, significant associations were only observed in the studies with sample sizes smaller than 100, follow-up shorter than 60 months, and patient age ≤ 65 years (HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.04–3.74; HR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.23–4.55; HR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.19–5.21, respectively) (Table 3).
Table 3

Subgroup results of PFS and heterogeneity test.

Heterogeneity test
VariablesStudy numberHR (95% CI)Q P I2 (%)
Total PFS81.37 (0.90–2.09)12.650.08144.7
Region
 Asian23.13 (0.83–11.80)0.150.7030.0
 Caucasian61.26 (0.81–1.95)9.840.08049.2
Sample size
 ≥ 10020.78 (0.43–1.42)0.220.6370.0
 < 10061.97 (1.04–3.74)11.520.04256.6
Follow-up (months)
 ≥ 6051.10 (0.70–1.72)6.470.16638.2
 < 6032.37 (1.23–4.55)0.090.9560.0
Stage
 All NMIBC31.58 (0.60–4.12)3.610.16444.7
 T1G341.86 (0.80–4.34)6.110.10650.9
Cut-off
 20%41.89 (0.84–4.25)4.980.17339.8
 Others41.04 (0.87–1.25)3.200.3626.1
Publication year
 ≥ 200941.41(0.54–3.70)6.460.09153.6
 < 200941.53(0.85–2.78)6.180.10351.4
Patient age (years)
 > 6561.13(0.76–1.68)7.230.20430.8
 ≤ 6522.49(1.19–5.21)0.000.9840.0

Galbraith plot and meta-regression

Through the Galbraith plot, the studies performed by Saint et al. [12] and Oderda et al. [15] were detected as the major sources of heterogeneity for RFS (Fig. 3A). After excluding these 2 studies, there was no evidence of heterogeneity across the remaining studies (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.499) and the overall association became statistically significant (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08–1.77). Furthermore, the Galbraith plot suggested that the study conducted by Lacombe et al. [17] contributed to the heterogeneity for PFS (Fig. 3B). After excluding this study, the pooled HR for the remaining 7 studies was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.79–1.68) and heterogeneity was obviously reduced (I2 = 25.7%, P = 0.233). Furthermore, seven factors (publication year, region, sample size, stage, cut-off, patient age, and follow-up time), which may contribute to the heterogeneity, were assessed by meta-regression. As a result, only the patient age was identified as a possible source of heterogeneity for RFS (P = 0.05).
Fig 3

Galbraith plot analysis was used to evaluate heterogeneity.

It suggested that two studies were the potential source of heterogeneity for RFS (A), while one for PFS (B).

Galbraith plot analysis was used to evaluate heterogeneity.

It suggested that two studies were the potential source of heterogeneity for RFS (A), while one for PFS (B).

Cumulative meta-analysis

Cumulative meta-analysis, in the order of the publication time, was conducted. S1 Fig. shows the results from the cumulative meta-analysis of the association between p53 and RFS or PFS, which are given in chronologic order. The 95% confidence intervals gradually narrowed with the increasing number of included studies, suggesting that the precision of the summary estimates was progressively boosted by continually enrolling more cases.

Publication bias

In the present meta-analysis, using Begg’s and Egger’s tests, there was no evidence of significant publication bias among the studies with respect to RFS (P = 0.754, 0.488) or PFS (P = 0.174, 0.110) (Fig. 4). In addition, the trim-and-fill method suggested that there was no significant change after trimming and filling (data not shown).
Fig 4

Funnel plots of p53 expression and RFS (A) or PFS (B).

Discussion

The current meta-analysis summarizes the results of the published data, which are based on a total of 11 studies (including over 1,000 cancer cases). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between p53 status and the prognosis of NMIBC patients treated with BCG. The results suggested that overall there was no clear relationship between them. However, in stratified analysis by region, overexpression of p53 was a predictor of poor RFS in Asian populations. This finding suggested that the ethnicity or geographic settings might play an important role in the impact of p53 overexpression on the prognosis of NMIBC patients who undergo BCG treatment after initial TURB. The Galbraith plot suggested that the observed heterogeneity among the studies of p53 status and RFS could be explained by the studies conducted by Saint et al. [12] and Oderda et al. [15]. These studies reported the strongest positive and negative relationships (HR: 6.67, 95% CI: 2.38–16.67; HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38–0.98, respectively). After excluding these 2 studies, the association between p53 overexpression and RFS in NMIBC patients treated with BCG became significant (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08–1.77) without any evidence of study heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.499). These results suggested that the heterogeneity across the included studies might have led to an underestimation of the risk estimate for RFS, and p53 was likely to be a potential predictor of RFS. The prognosis of NMIBC, also called superficial bladder cancer, is heterogeneous and clinical treatments vary considerably between patients [31-33]. According to the recommendations of the 2013 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, the risks of both recurrence and progression could be estimated for individual patients by applying the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring system, which incorporates the following six most important clinical and pathologic factors: tumor number, grade, size, prior recurrence rate, T category, and concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS). Using the above characteristics, patients can be divided into several risk groups with different adjuvant therapy, either chemotherapy or immunotherapy with BCG [34]. In addition, the Spanish Urological Club for Oncological Treatment (CUETO) scoring model was developed for BCG-treated patients to predict the short- and long-term probabilities of recurrence and progression and the discrimination was superior to EORTC in BCG-treated patients [34,35]. However, accurately predicting which NMIBC patients will experience recurrence or progression to muscle-invasive disease is still very difficult [36]. Therefore, there is a need for new and reliable prognostic factors. In human cancers, p53 is the most commonly inactivated tumor suppressor gene [37]. Loss of expression of wild-type p53 contributes to abnormal cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, while mutant p53 can gain new abilities promoting cell migration, invasion and metastasis, which are partially from interference with p63 function [38]. Many IHC studies have confirmed that p53 is highly overexpressed in bladder cancer patients and that it is associated with advanced bladder tumor stage and grade [39,40]. Furthermore, p53 overexpression appears to correlate with the mitotic index and vascular invasion [41]. Therefore, p53 is a potential surrogate biomarker for NMIBC patients who are treated with BCG. As mentioned previously, several studies have investigated the influence of p53 overexpression on NMIBC patients who have undergone intravesical BCG treatment after initial TURB. However, the results of these reports are still controversial. As individual studies may have insufficient statistical power, our meta-analysis of 11 studies, involving a great many NMIBC patients, enhanced the statistical power and provided more reliable estimates. To date, various meta-analyses have evaluated the relationship between p53 and bladder cancer with a focus on other topics. For example, several meta-analyses have assessed the relationship between p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and bladder cancer risk [42-46]. As a consequence, most of these reported that p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer in Asians but not in Caucasians [42-45]. This result was similar to our study, which also indicated that the association was more robust in Asians than Caucasians. Therefore, p53 may really have race-specific effects on bladder cancer. With respect to the prognosis, the meta-analysis conducted by Malats et al, which was published in 2005, suggested that the evidence was not sufficient to conclude whether p53 could serve as a marker of the outcome in patients with bladder cancer [47]. Several important limitations should be considered in interpreting the results of our meta-analysis. First, this meta-analysis was limited by the presence of heterogeneity across the studies. The heterogeneity may be from the differences in the characteristics of the patients, technical platforms, cut-off values, and follow-up time. Second, although the Begg’s and Egger’s test did not indicate any evidence of publication bias, the results may have been influenced by publication bias, because only studies published in English and Chinese were searched and included. Finally, there was a wide range of values for the cut-off points for the low and high categories of p53 expression in the included studies, which might also have an impact on the current analysis. Therefore, large cohort studies must be performed in the future with uniform criteria for high p53 expression. In conclusion, our study suggests that, based on the available information, p53 overexpression in NMIBC patients treated with BCG may be associated with RFS, especially in Asian populations. Because of the limitations discussed above, further studies with rigid criteria and large populations are still warranted to confirm the findings of our study. (DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Results from cumulative meta-analysis of the association between p53 expression and RFS (A) or PFS (B).

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.
  47 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Expression of regulatory proteins and proliferative activity in relation to phenotypic characteristics of upper urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Zana Dolićanin; Ljubinka Janković Velicković; Biljana Djordjević; Milan Visnjić; Ivana Pesić; Ana Ristić; Vesna Marjanović
Journal:  Vojnosanit Pregl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.168

3.  P53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and bladder cancer risk--meta-analysis evidence for a link in Asians but not Caucasians.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Zi-Cheng Xu; Qin Zou; Bin Yu; Xin-En Huang
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Overexpression of p53 protein in a high-risk population of patients with superficial bladder cancer before and after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy: correlation to clinical outcome.

Authors:  L Lacombe; G Dalbagni; Z F Zhang; C Cordon-Cardo; W R Fair; H W Herr; V E Reuter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prognostic markers of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for multiple, high-grade, stage T1 bladder cancers.

Authors:  E Lee; I Park; C Lee
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Expression of genes related to apoptosis, cell cycle and signaling pathways are independent of TP53 status in urinary bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Glenda N da Silva; Adriane F Evangelista; Danielle A Magalhães; Cláudia Macedo; Michelle C Búfalo; Elza T Sakamoto-Hojo; Geraldo A S Passos; Daisy M F Salvadori
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Prognostic factors including Ki-67 and p53 in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-treated non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marco Oderda; Fulvio Ricceri; Francesca Pisano; Chiara Fiorito; Alberto Gurioli; Giovanni Casetta; Andrea Zitella; Donatella Pacchioni; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Altered p53 and pRb expression is predictive of response to BCG treatment in T1G3 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Cormio; Isabella Tolve; Pasquale Annese; Angelo Saracino; Rosanna Zamparese; Francesca Sanguedolce; Pantaleo Bufo; Michele Battaglia; Francesco P Selvaggi; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world.

Authors:  Martine Ploeg; Katja K H Aben; Lambertus A Kiemeney
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  12 in total

1.  Ki-67 and Cell Cycle Regulators p53, p63 and cyclinD1 as Prognostic Markers for Recurrence/ Progression of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Saba El-Gendi; Ghada Abu-Sheasha
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Next-generation Sequencing of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Reveals Potential Biomarkers and Rational Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Eugene J Pietzak; Aditya Bagrodia; Eugene K Cha; Esther N Drill; Gopa Iyer; Sumit Isharwal; Irina Ostrovnaya; Priscilla Baez; Qiang Li; Michael F Berger; Ahmet Zehir; Nikolaus Schultz; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Dean F Bajorin; Guido Dalbagni; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; David B Solit; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  High Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Reactivity Correlates With Poor Prognosis in Bladder Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis with 13,053 Patients Involved.

Authors:  Yihuan Luo; Xin Zhang; Meile Mo; Zhong Tan; Lanshan Huang; Hong Zhou; Chunqin Wang; Fanglin Wei; Xiaohui Qiu; Rongquan He; Gang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Predictive Markers for the Recurrence of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Intravesical Therapy.

Authors:  Yasuyoshi Miyata; Hideki Sakai
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Combined detection of the expression of Nm23-H1 and p53 is correlated with survival rates of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yinying Wu; Yi Li; Xiaoai Zhao; Danfeng Dong; Chunhui Tang; Enxiao Li; Qianqian Geng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Prognostic value of ki67 in BCG-treated non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Yuhui He; Ning Wang; Xiaofeng Zhou; Jianfeng Wang; Zhenshan Ding; Xing Chen; Yisen Deng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Intensity of Nuclear Staining for Ki-67, p53 and Survivin as a New Prognostic Factor in Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Rafał Stec; Szczepan Cierniak; Arkadiusz Lubas; Urszula Brzóskowska; Tomasz Syryło; Henryk Zieliński; Aleksandra Semeniuk-Wojtaś
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Prognostic factors of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a study based on next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yanxiang Shao; Xu Hu; Zhen Yang; Thongher Lia; Weixiao Yang; Kan Wu; Shangqing Ren; Sanchao Xiong; Weichao Dou; Shuyang Feng; Yaohui Wang; Yang Liu; Kang Wu; Xiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Prognostic significance of p53 expression in patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lianghai Wang; Xiaodan Yu; Jing Li; Zhiyu Zhang; Jun Hou; Feng Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Molecular markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jakub Dobruch; Anirban P Mitra; Brant A Inman; Kilian M Gust; Yair Lotan; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.