OBJECTIVES: To adapt an established instrument for measuring adolescents' cigarette-related perceptions for new application with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). METHODS: In this exploratory study, 104 male high school students (40% tobacco ever-users) estimated the probability of potential e-cigarette risks (eg, lung cancer) or benefits (eg, look cool). We calculated associations between risk/benefit composite scores, ever-use, and use intention for e-cigarettes, and analogously, for combustible cigarettes. RESULTS: E-cigarette ever-use was associated with lower perceived risks, with adjusted differences versus never-users greater for e-cigarettes than for cigarettes. Risk composite score was inversely associated, and benefit score positively associated, with e-cigarette ever-use and use intention. CONCLUSION: Conditional risk assessment characterized adolescents' perceived e-cigarette risk/benefit profile, with potential utility for risk-perception measurement in future studies.
OBJECTIVES: To adapt an established instrument for measuring adolescents' cigarette-related perceptions for new application with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). METHODS: In this exploratory study, 104 male high school students (40% tobacco ever-users) estimated the probability of potential e-cigarette risks (eg, lung cancer) or benefits (eg, look cool). We calculated associations between risk/benefit composite scores, ever-use, and use intention for e-cigarettes, and analogously, for combustible cigarettes. RESULTS: E-cigarette ever-use was associated with lower perceived risks, with adjusted differences versus never-users greater for e-cigarettes than for cigarettes. Risk composite score was inversely associated, and benefit score positively associated, with e-cigarette ever-use and use intention. CONCLUSION: Conditional risk assessment characterized adolescents' perceived e-cigarette risk/benefit profile, with potential utility for risk-perception measurement in future studies.
Authors: Jennifer O'Loughlin; Joseph DiFranza; Rachel F Tyndale; Garbis Meshefedjian; Elizabeth McMillan-Davey; Paul B S Clarke; James Hanley; Gilles Paradis Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anna V Song; Holly E R Morrell; Jodi L Cornell; Malena E Ramos; Michael Biehl; Rhonda Y Kropp; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joseph R DiFranza; Judith A Savageau; Kenneth Fletcher; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Lori Pbert; Judith K Ockene; Ann D McNeill; Jennifer Hazelton; Karen Friedman; Gretchen Dussault; Connie Wood; Robert J Wellman Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2007-07
Authors: David R Strong; Karen Messer; Martha White; Yuyan Shi; Madison Noble; David B Portnoy; Alexander Persoskie; Annette R Kaufman; Kelvin Choi; Charles Carusi; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; John Pierce Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Maria Cooper; Alexandra Loukas; Kathleen R Case; C Nathan Marti; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Claire Adams Spears; Dina M Jones; Scott R Weaver; Bo Yang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Laura A Gibson; MeLisa R Creamer; Alison B Breland; Aida Luz Giachello; Annette Kaufman; Grace Kong; Terry F Pechacek; Jessica K Pepper; Eric K Soule; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 5.691