Literature DB >> 25741668

Feasibility of Imaging and Treatment Monitoring of Breast Lesions with Three-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography.

Alexandra Athanasiou1, Heldmuth Latorre-Ossa2, Aline Criton3, Anne Tardivon1, Jean-Luc Gennisson2, Mickael Tanter2.   

Abstract

Purpose Firstly to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3 D) shear wave elastography (SWE) volume measurements in patients with breast lesions compared to breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) lesion volumes and 3D-US B-mode volumes. Secondly to assess the treatment monitoring performance of 3D-SWE in patients under neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer by comparing it to 3D-US lesion volume. Materials and Methods This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Informed consent was provided. 33 patients with 33 lesions were included. The feasibility of 3D-SWE was evaluated in 23 patients. In the 10 remaining patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 3D-SWE was evaluated before and during treatment. Tumor volume and qualitative and quantitative elasticity analysis measurements were performed and compared to the tumor volume as estimated by 3D-US and DCE-MRI. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results 3D-SWE was feasible in patients with breast lesions. Tumor volume calculated with 3D-US and 3D-SWE showed very good and moderate concordances with DCE-MRI volume, respectively (Pearson correlation coefficients equal to ρ = r = 0.88, p < 0.00 002 and ρ = r = 0.5, p = 0.32, respectively). Modification of tumor elasticity and heterogeneity was correlated with response to treatment. In good responders, elasticity and elasticity heterogeneity diminished. Conclusion Tumor 3D-US volume measurements showed very good concordance with DCE-MRI volume. 3D-SWE can provide valuable information: reduction of tissue stiffness during treatment could be a potential indicator of response. These preliminary results should be confirmed on a larger number of patients. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25741668     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current and future trends in photoacoustic breast imaging.

Authors:  Srirang Manohar; Maura Dantuma
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-06-30

Review 2.  Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications.

Authors:  Mihra S Taljanovic; Lana H Gimber; Giles W Becker; L Daniel Latt; Andrea S Klauser; David M Melville; Liang Gao; Russell S Witte
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Improving Displacement Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Low-Signal Radiation Force Elasticity Imaging Using Bayesian Techniques.

Authors:  Douglas M Dumont; Kristy M Walsh; Brett C Byram
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quantification of breast stiffness using MR elastography at 3 Tesla with a soft sternal driver: A reproducibility study.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Hawley; Prateek Kalra; Xiaokui Mo; Brian Raterman; Lisa D Yee; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Tumor Stiffening, a Key Determinant of Tumor Progression, is Reversed by Nanomaterial-Induced Photothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Iris Marangon; Amanda A K Silva; Thomas Guilbert; Jelena Kolosnjaj-Tabi; Carmen Marchiol; Sharuja Natkhunarajah; Foucault Chamming's; Cécilia Ménard-Moyon; Alberto Bianco; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gilles Renault; Florence Gazeau
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Structural, biomechanical and hemodynamic assessment of the bladder wall in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Antonina I Volikova; Barry J Marshall; J M A Yin; Robert Goodwin; Peter Ee-Pan Chow; Michael J Wise
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-09-03

Review 7.  Ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Kang-Ning Li; Ai-Jiao Yi; Bin Wang; Qi Wei; Ge-Ge Wu; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 8.  Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-04-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.