Literature DB >> 25741440

Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project.

Erich D Jarvis1, Siavash Mirarab2, Andre J Aberer3, Bo Li4, Peter Houde5, Cai Li6, Simon Y W Ho7, Brant C Faircloth8, Benoit Nabholz9, Jason T Howard1, Alexander Suh10, Claudia C Weber10, Rute R da Fonseca11, Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez11, Nitish Narula12, Liang Liu13, Dave Burt14, Hans Ellegren10, Scott V Edwards15, Alexandros Stamatakis16, David P Mindell17, Joel Cracraft18, Edward L Braun19, Tandy Warnow2, Wang Jun20, M Thomas Pius Gilbert21, Guojie Zhang22.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining the evolutionary relationships among the major lineages of extant birds has been one of the biggest challenges in systematic biology. To address this challenge, we assembled or collected the genomes of 48 avian species spanning most orders of birds, including all Neognathae and two of the five Palaeognathae orders. We used these genomes to construct a genome-scale avian phylogenetic tree and perform comparative genomic analyses.
FINDINGS: Here we present the datasets associated with the phylogenomic analyses, which include sequence alignment files consisting of nucleotides, amino acids, indels, and transposable elements, as well as tree files containing gene trees and species trees. Inferring an accurate phylogeny required generating: 1) A well annotated data set across species based on genome synteny; 2) Alignments with unaligned or incorrectly overaligned sequences filtered out; and 3) Diverse data sets, including genes and their inferred trees, indels, and transposable elements. Our total evidence nucleotide tree (TENT) data set (consisting of exons, introns, and UCEs) gave what we consider our most reliable species tree when using the concatenation-based ExaML algorithm or when using statistical binning with the coalescence-based MP-EST algorithm (which we refer to as MP-EST*). Other data sets, such as the coding sequence of some exons, revealed other properties of genome evolution, namely convergence.
CONCLUSIONS: The Avian Phylogenomics Project is the largest vertebrate phylogenomics project to date that we are aware of. The sequence, alignment, and tree data are expected to accelerate analyses in phylogenomics and other related areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian genomes; Gene trees; Indels; Phylogenomics; Sequence alignments; Species tree; Transposable elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25741440      PMCID: PMC4349222          DOI: 10.1186/s13742-014-0038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Data description

Here we present FASTA files of loci, sequence alignments, indels, transposable elements, and Newick files of gene trees and species trees used in the Avian Phylogenomics Project [1-4]. We also include scripts used to process the data. The 48 species from which we collected these data span the phylogeny of modern birds, including representatives of all Neognathae (Neoaves and Galloanseres) and two of the five Palaeognathae orders (Table 1) [5-7].
Table 1

Genomes used in the avian phylogenomics project

Species English name BioProject ID GigaScience
Acanthisitta chloris RiflemanPRJNA212877 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101015
Anas platyrhynchos Pekin DuckPRJNA46621 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101001
Antrostomus carolinensis Chuck-will’s-widowPRJNA212888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101019
Apaloderma vittatum Bar-tailed TrogonPRJNA212878 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101016
Aptenodytes forsteri Emperor PenguinPRJNA235982 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100005
Balearica regulorum Grey Crowned-cranePRJNA212879 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101017
Buceros rhinoceros Rhinoceros HornbillPRJNA212887 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101018
Calypte anna Anna’s HummingbirdPRJNA212866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101004
Cariama cristata Red-legged SeriemaPRJNA212889 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101020
Cathartes aura Turkey VulturePRJNA212890 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101021
Chaetura pelagica Chimney SwiftPRJNA210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101005
Charadrius vociferus KilldeerPRJNA212867 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101007
Chlamydotis macqueenii MacQueen’s BustardPRJNA212891 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101022
Colius striatus Speckled MousebirdPRJNA212892 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101023
Columba livia PigeonPRJNA167554 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100007
Corvus brachyrhynchos American CrowPRJNA212869 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101008
Cuculus canorus Common CuckooPRJNA212870 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101009
Egretta garzetta Little EgretPRJNA232959 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101002
Eurypyga helias SunbitternPRJNA212893 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101024
Falco peregrinus Peregrine FalconPRJNA159791 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101006
Fulmarus glacialis Northern FulmarPRJNA212894 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101025
Gallus gallus ChickenPRJNA13342N.A.
Gavia stellata Red-throated LoonPRJNA212895 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101026
Geospiza fortis Medium Ground-finchPRJNA156703 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100040
Haliaeetus albicilla White-tailed EaglePRJNA212896 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101027
Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald EaglePRJNA237821 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101040
Leptosomus discolor Cuckoo-rollerPRJNA212897 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101028
Manacus vitellinus Golden-collared ManakinPRJNA212872 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101010
Meleagris gallopavo TurkeyPRJNA42129N.A.
Melopsittacus undulatus BudgerigarPRJNA72527 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100059
Merops nubicus Carmine Bee-eaterPRJNA212898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101029
Mesitornis unicolor Brown MesitePRJNA212899 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101030
Nestor notabilis KeaPRJNA212900 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101031
Nipponia nippon Crested ibisPRJNA232572 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101003
Opisthocomus hoazin HoatzinPRJNA212873 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101011
Pelecanus crispus Dalmatian PelicanPRJNA212901 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101032
Phaethon lepturus White-tailed TropicbirdPRJNA212902 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101033
Phalacrocorax carbo Great CormorantPRJNA212903 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101034
Phoenicopterus ruber American FlamingoPRJNA212904 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101035
Picoides pubescens Downy WoodpeckerPRJNA212874 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101012
Podiceps cristatus Great Crested GrebePRJNA212905 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101036
Pterocles gutturalis Yellow-throated SandgrousePRJNA212906 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101037
Pygoscelis adeliae Adelie PenguinPRJNA235983 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100006
Struthio camelus Common OstrichPRJNA212875 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101013
Taeniopygia guttata Zebra FinchPRJNA17289N.A.
Tauraco erythrolophus Red-crested TuracoPRJNA212908 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101038
Tinamus guttatus White-throated TinamouPRJNA212876 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101014
Tyto alba Barn OwlPRJNA212909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/101039

Listed are the scientific species name, English name, BioProject ID in the NCBI database for each genome (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject), and GigaScience deposited genome sequences and raw reads. Full details are in [1,2].

Genomes used in the avian phylogenomics project Listed are the scientific species name, English name, BioProject ID in the NCBI database for each genome (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject), and GigaScience deposited genome sequences and raw reads. Full details are in [1,2].

Explanation of various data sets used to infer gene and species trees

Here we describe each locus data set in brief. Additional details are provided in Jarvis et al. [1].

8295 protein-coding exon gene set

This is an exon-coding sequence data set of 8295 genes based on synteny-defined orthologs we identified and selected from the assembled genomes of chicken and zebra finch [8,9]. We required these loci to be present in at least 42 of the 48 avian species and outgroups, which allowed for missing data due to incomplete assemblies. To be included in the dataset, the exons in each genome assembly had to be 30% or more of the full-length sequence of the chicken or zebra finch ortholog. Annotated untranslated regions (UTRs) were trimmed off to remove non-coding sequence, in order to infer a coding-only sequence phylogeny. We note that 44 genes were identified with various problems such as gene annotation issues, and we removed them in the phylogenetic analyses. However, we provide them here in the unfiltered alignments.

8295 protein amino acid alignment set

These are alignments of the translated peptide sequences for the 8295 protein-coding gene data set.

2516 intron gene set

This is an orthologous subset of introns from the 8295 protein-coding genes among 52 species (includes outgroups). Introns with conserved annotated exon-intron boundaries between chicken and another species (±1 codon) were chosen. We filtered out introns with length < 50 bp or intron length ratio > 1.5 between chicken and another species or another species and chicken. This filtering resulted in a conservative subset of introns that could be reliably identified and aligned.

3679 UCE locus set

This is the ultraconserved element (UCE) data set with 1000 bp flanking sequence at the 3′ and 5′ ends. The UCE dataset was filtered to remove overlap with the above exon and intron data sets, other exons and introns in the chicken genome assembly version 3, and overlapping sequences among the UCEs. The source UCE sequences used to search the genomes were determined from sequence capture probes [10-12] aligned to each avian genome assembly. Unlike the exon and intron data sets, we required that all 42 avian species and the alligator outgroup contain the UCEs. We found this requirement to be sufficient, because the central portions of UCEs are highly conserved across all species.

High and low variance introns and exons

These four data sets represent the 10% subsets of the 8295 exons and their associated introns when available (i.e. from the same genes) that had the highest and lowest variance in GC3 (third codon position) content across species. To calculate GC3 variance, we first calculated GC3 for each ortholog in each species, and then we used the correlation coefficient R to calculate variance in GC3 for each species. Orthologs were ranked by their GC3 variance and we selected the top and bottom 10% for analyses.

Supergenes

These are the concatenated sets of loci from various partitions of the TENT dataset (exons, introns, and UCEs described above), brought together using the statistical binning approach. The statistical binning approach put together sets of loci that were deemed “combinable”. Two genes were considered combinable if their respective gene trees had no pairs of incompatible branches that had bootstrap support above a 50% threshold. Alignments of genes in the same bin were concatenated to form supergenes, but boundaries of genes were kept so that a gene-partitioned phylogenetic analysis could be performed on each supergene.

Whole genome alignment

Whole genome alignments were first created by a LASTZ + MULTIZ alignment [13,14] (http://www.bx.psu.edu/miller_lab/) across all 48 bird species and outgroups using individual chromosomes of the chicken genome as the reference (initial alignment 392,719,329 Mb). They were filtered for segments with fewer than 42 avian species (>5 missing bird species) and aberrant sequence alignments. The individual remaining segments of the MULTIZ alignment were realigned with MAFFT. We did not use SATé + MAFFT due to computational challenges (too much input/output was required).

Indel dataset

5.7 million insertions and deletions (indels) were scored as binary characters locus by locus from the same intron, exon, and UCE alignments as used in the TENT data set on the principle of simple indel coding using 2Xread [15,16] and then concatenated. Coding was verified using GapCoder [17] and by visual inspection of alignments for a small subset of data. Intron indels were scored on alignments that excluded non-avian outgroups (48 taxa), UCE indels were scored on alignments that included Alligator (49 taxa), and exons were scored on alignments that included all non-avian outgroups (52 taxa). Individual introns of the same gene were scored independently to avoid creating artifactual indels between concatenated intron or whole genome segments, whereas exons were concatenated as complete unigenes before scoring. For exons, indels >30 bp were excluded to avoid scoring missing exons as indels.

Transposable element markers

These are 61 manually curated presence/absence loci of transposable elements (TEs) present in the Barn Owl genome that exhibit presence at orthologous positions in one or more of the other avian species. The TE markers were identified by eye after a computational screening of 3,671 TguLTR5d retroposon insertions from the Barn Owl. For each TguLTR5d locus, we conducted BLASTn searches of TE-flanking sequences (1 kb per flank) against the remaining avian species and generated multispecies sequence alignments using MAFFT [18]. Redundant or potentially paralogous loci were excluded from analysis and the remaining marker candidates were carefully inspected using strict standard criteria for assigning presence/absence character states [19-21].

FASTA files of loci datasets in alignments

We provide the above loci data sets as FASTA files of both unfiltered and filtered sequence alignments. The alignments were filtered for aberrant over- and under-aligned sequences, and for the presence of the loci in 42 of the 48 avian species. All multiple sequence alignments were performed in two rounds. The first round was used to find contiguous portions of sequences that we identified as aberrant, and the second round was used to realign the filtered sequences. We used SATé [22,23] combined with either MAFFT [18] or PRANK [24] alignment algorithms, depending on the limitations of working with large datasets. Alignments without and with outgroups are made available.

Filtered loci sequence alignments

Exon loci alignments

These are filtered alignments of exons from 8295 genes. Of these 8295, there were 42 genes that were identified to have annotation issues and we removed them from the phylogenetic analyses (the list is provided in the file FASTA_files_of_loci_datasets/Filtered_sequence_alignments/8295_Exons/42-exon-genes-removed.txt). Two more genes were removed because a gene tree could not be estimated for them. The first round of alignment was performed using SATé + PRANK, and the second round was performed using SATé + MAFFT. Before alignment, the nucleotide sequences were converted to amino acid sequences, and then reverted back to nucleotide sequences afterwards. 8295 Exons 42-exon-genes-removed.txt: list of 42 genes removed due to various issues pep2cds-filtered-sate-alignments-noout.tar.gz: DNA alignments (Amino acid alignments translated to DNA) without outgroups pep2cds-filtered-sate-alignments-original.zip: DNA alignments (Amino acid alignments translated to DNA) with outgroups included 8295 Amino Acids pep-filtered-sate-alignments-noout.tar.gz: Amino acid alignments with outgroups removed pep-filtered-sate-alignments-original.zip: Amino acid alignments with outgroups included

Intron loci alignments

These are filtered alignments of introns from 2516 genes. Both rounds of alignment were performed using SATé + MAFFT, because SATé + PRANK was too computationally expensive on long introns. 2516 Introns introns-filtered-sate-alignments-with-and-without-outgroups.tar.gz: Includes both alignments with and without outgroups

UCE loci alignments

These are alignments of UCEs and their surrounding 1000 bp from 3769 loci after filtering. Both rounds of alignment were performed using SATé + MAFFT. 3769 UCE + 1000 flanking bp uce-probes-used.fasta.gz: Probes targeting UCE loci shared among vertebrate taxa. uce-raw-genome-slices-of-probe-matches.tar: Probe + flank slices around locations matching probes targeting UCE loci. uce-raw-lastz-results-of-probe-matches.tar: LASTZ results of mapping probes onto genome assemblies. uce-assembled-loci-from-probe-matches.tar: UCE loci assembled from probe + flank slices from each genome. uce-filtered-alignments-w-gator.tar.gz: UCE individual alignments without outgroups uce-filtered-alignments-without-gator.tar.gz: UCE individual alignments with outgroups

Supergenes generated from statistical binning

These are concatenated alignments for each of our 2022 supergene alignments. We note that although supergenes are concatenated loci, we estimated supergene trees using partitioned analyses where each gene was put in a different partition. Thus, we also provide the boundaries between genes in text files (these can be directly used as partition input files to RAxML). supergene-alignments.tar.bz2: supergene alignments with partition files showing genes put in each bin and their boundaries in the concatenated alignment

Unfiltered loci sequence alignments

These are individual loci alignments of the above data sets, before filtering. Amino.Acid.unfiltered pep-unfiltered-alignments-original.zip: unfiltered SATé + Prank alignments used for the filtering step Exon.c123.unfiltered: pep2cds-unfiltered-alignemtns-original.zip: unfiltered SATé + Prank alignments used for the filtering step Intron.unfiltered introns-unfiltered-alignments-original.zip: intron SATé alignments before filtering with outgroups included introns-unfiltered-alignments-noout.zip: intron SATé alignments before filtering with outgroups included UCE.unfiltered uce-unfiltered-alignments-w-gator.tar.gz: UCE alignments before filtering with alligator outgroup WGT.unfiltered These are uploaded as part of the comparative genomics paper [2] data note [25], and a link is provided here https://github.com/gigascience/paper-zhang2014.

FASTA files of concatenated datasets in alignments

We provide FASTA files of concatenated sequence alignments of the above filtered loci datasets. These are concatenated alignments that were used in the ExaML and RAxML analyses [3].

Concatenated alignments used in ExaML analyses

Exon.AminoAcid.ExaML.partitioned Exon.c123. ExaML.partitioned Exon.c123. ExaML.unpartitioned Exon.c1.ExaML.unpartitioned Exon.c2.ExaML.unpartitioned Exon.c12.ExaML.unpartitioned Exon.c123-RY.ExaML.unpartitioned Exon.c3.ExaML.unpartitioned Intron TEIT.RAxML TENT + c3.ExaML TENT + outgroup.ExaML TENT.ExaML.100% TENT.ExaML.25% TENT.ExaML.50% TENT.ExaML.75% WGT.ExaML

Concatenated alignments used in RAxML analyses

UCE concatenated alignments with and without the alligator uce-filtered-alignments-w-gator-concatenated.phylip.gz uce-filtered-alignments-without-gator-concatenated.phylip.gz

Clocklike exon alignment

Concatenated c12 (1st + 2nd codons) DNA sequence alignments from the 1156 clocklike genes were used for the dating analyses. These are alignments of the first and second codon positions of clock-like genes among the 8295 exon orthologs: c12.DNA.alignment.1156.clocklike.zip c12.DNA.alignment.1156.clocklike.txt c12.DNA.alignment.clocklike.readme.txt c12.DNA.alignment.clocklike.txt.zip

High and low variance exons and their associated introns

High variance exons: Exon.heterogeneous.c123 Exon.heterogenous.c12 Low variance exons: Exon.homogeneous.c123. Exon.homogenous.c12 High variance introns: These are heterogenous introns concatIntronNooutMSAlow.fasta.gz Low variance introns: These are homogenous introns concatIntronNooutMSAhigh.fasta.gz

Indel sequence alignments

This is a concatenated alignment of indels from exons, introns, and UCEs. A README file describes the content.

Transposable element markers

owl_TE_marker_Table.txt

Species and gene tree files

Species trees (Newick format) were generated with either RAxML, an improved ExaML version for handling large alignments, or MP-EST* [4]. We deposit both the maximum likelihood and bootstrap replicate trees.

Newick files for 32 species trees using different genomic partitions and methods

Exon.AminoAcid.ExaML.partitioned.tre Exon.c123.ExaML.partitioned.tre Exon.c123.ExaML.unpartititoned.tre Exon.c123-RY.ExaML.unpartitioned.tre Exon.c12.ExaML.partitioned.tre Exon.c12.ExaML.unpartitioned.tre Exon.c1.ExaML.unpartitioned.tre Exon.c2.ExaML.unpartitioned.tre Exon.c3.ExaML.unpartitioned.tre Exon.RAxML.heterogenous.c123.tre Exon.RAxML.heterogenous.c12.tre Exon.RAxML.homogenous.c123.tre Exon.RAxML.homogenous.c12.tre Intron.RAxML.heterogenous.tre.txt Intron.RAxML.homogenous.tre.txt Intron.RAxML.partitioned.tre Intron.RAxML.unpartitioned.tre Intron.MP-EST.binned.tre Intron.MP-EST.unbinned.tre TEIT.RAxML.tre TENT + c3.ExaML.tre TENT + outgroup.ExaML.tre TENT.ExaML.100%.tre TENT.ExaML.25%.tre TENT.ExaML.50%.tre TENT.ExaML.75%.tre UCE.RAxML.unpartitioned.tre WGT.ExaML.alternative.tre WGT.ExaML.best.tree

Newick files of the 11 timetrees (chronograms)

Chronogram01.TENT.ExAML.tre Chronogram02.TENT.ExAML.max865.tre Chronogram03.TENT.ExAML.Allig247.tre Chronogram04.TENT.ExAML.no-outgroup.tre Chronogram05.TENT.ExAML.no-outgroup.max865.tre Chronogram06.TENT.MP-EST.tre Chronogram07.WGT.ExAML.alternative.tre Chronogram08.WGT.ExAML.best.tre Chronogram09.Intron.ExAML.unpartitioned.tre Chronogram10.UCE.RAxML.tre Chronogram11.Exon.c123.RaXML.partitioned.tre

Newick file downloads of gene trees (species abbreviated with 5-letter names)

ML (bestML) gene trees Bootstrap replicates of ML gene trees ML (bestML) supergene trees used in MP-EST analyses Bootstrap replicates of supergene trees used in MP-EST analyses Partition files showing which loci make up which bins for MP-EST analyses

List of scripts used in avian phylogenomics project

We also deposit the key scripts used in this project in GigaDB, which include: Script for filtering amino acid alignments Script for filtering nucleotide sequence alignments Script for mapping names from 5-letter codes to full names Scripts related to indel analyses We provide readme files in the script directories describing the usage of the scripts.

Availability and requirements

Project name: Avian Phylogenomic Project scripts Project home page: https://github.com/gigascience/paper-jarvis2014; also see companion paper home page for related data https://github.com/gigascience/paper-zhang2014 Operating system: Unix Programming language: R, Perl, python License: GNU GPL v3. Any restrictions to use by non-academics: none

Availability of supporting data

Other data files presented in this data note for the majority of genomes are available in the GigaScience repository, GigaDB [26] (Table 1), as well as NCBI (Table 1), ENSEMBL, UCSC, and CoGe databases. ENSEMBL: http://avianbase.narf.ac.uk/index.html UCSC: (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway; under vertebrate genomes) CoGe: (https://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Bird_CoGe).
  20 in total

1.  Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner.

Authors:  Mathieu Blanchette; W James Kent; Cathy Riemer; Laura Elnitski; Arian F A Smit; Krishna M Roskin; Robert Baertsch; Kate Rosenbloom; Hiram Clawson; Eric D Green; David Haussler; Webb Miller
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions.

Authors:  Ari Löytynoja; Nick Goldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Hiroyuki Toh
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree.

Authors:  Siavash Mirarab; Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; Bastien Boussau; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales.

Authors:  Brant C Faircloth; John E McCormack; Nicholas G Crawford; Michael G Harvey; Robb T Brumfield; Travis C Glenn
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation.

Authors:  Guojie Zhang; Cai Li; Qiye Li; Bo Li; Denis M Larkin; Chul Lee; Jay F Storz; Agostinho Antunes; Matthew J Greenwold; Robert W Meredith; Anders Ödeen; Jie Cui; Qi Zhou; Luohao Xu; Hailin Pan; Zongji Wang; Lijun Jin; Pei Zhang; Haofu Hu; Wei Yang; Jiang Hu; Jin Xiao; Zhikai Yang; Yang Liu; Qiaolin Xie; Hao Yu; Jinmin Lian; Ping Wen; Fang Zhang; Hui Li; Yongli Zeng; Zijun Xiong; Shiping Liu; Long Zhou; Zhiyong Huang; Na An; Jie Wang; Qiumei Zheng; Yingqi Xiong; Guangbiao Wang; Bo Wang; Jingjing Wang; Yu Fan; Rute R da Fonseca; Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez; Mikkel Schubert; Ludovic Orlando; Tobias Mourier; Jason T Howard; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Andreas Pfenning; Osceola Whitney; Miriam V Rivas; Erina Hara; Julia Smith; Marta Farré; Jitendra Narayan; Gancho Slavov; Michael N Romanov; Rui Borges; João Paulo Machado; Imran Khan; Mark S Springer; John Gatesy; Federico G Hoffmann; Juan C Opazo; Olle Håstad; Roger H Sawyer; Heebal Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Hyeon Jeong Kim; Seoae Cho; Ning Li; Yinhua Huang; Michael W Bruford; Xiangjiang Zhan; Andrew Dixon; Mads F Bertelsen; Elizabeth Derryberry; Wesley Warren; Richard K Wilson; Shengbin Li; David A Ray; Richard E Green; Stephen J O'Brien; Darren Griffin; Warren E Johnson; David Haussler; Oliver A Ryder; Eske Willerslev; Gary R Graves; Per Alström; Jon Fjeldså; David P Mindell; Scott V Edwards; Edward L Braun; Carsten Rahbek; David W Burt; Peter Houde; Yong Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Erich D Jarvis; M Thomas P Gilbert; Jun Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis; Siavash Mirarab; Andre J Aberer; Bo Li; Peter Houde; Cai Li; Simon Y W Ho; Brant C Faircloth; Benoit Nabholz; Jason T Howard; Alexander Suh; Claudia C Weber; Rute R da Fonseca; Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez; Nitish Narula; Liang Liu; Dave Burt; Hans Ellegren; Scott V Edwards; Alexandros Stamatakis; David P Mindell; Joel Cracraft; Edward L Braun; Tandy Warnow; Wang Jun; M Thomas Pius Gilbert; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Multiple lineages of ancient CR1 retroposons shaped the early genome evolution of amniotes.

Authors:  Alexander Suh; Gennady Churakov; Meganathan P Ramakodi; Roy N Platt; Jerzy Jurka; Kenji K Kojima; Juan Caballero; Arian F Smit; Kent A Vliet; Federico G Hoffmann; Jürgen Brosius; Richard E Green; Edward L Braun; David A Ray; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis; Siavash Mirarab; Andre J Aberer; Bo Li; Peter Houde; Cai Li; Simon Y W Ho; Brant C Faircloth; Benoit Nabholz; Jason T Howard; Alexander Suh; Claudia C Weber; Rute R da Fonseca; Jianwen Li; Fang Zhang; Hui Li; Long Zhou; Nitish Narula; Liang Liu; Ganesh Ganapathy; Bastien Boussau; Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; Volodymyr Zavidovych; Sankar Subramanian; Toni Gabaldón; Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Bhanu Rekepalli; Kasper Munch; Mikkel Schierup; Bent Lindow; Wesley C Warren; David Ray; Richard E Green; Michael W Bruford; Xiangjiang Zhan; Andrew Dixon; Shengbin Li; Ning Li; Yinhua Huang; Elizabeth P Derryberry; Mads Frost Bertelsen; Frederick H Sheldon; Robb T Brumfield; Claudio V Mello; Peter V Lovell; Morgan Wirthlin; Maria Paula Cruz Schneider; Francisco Prosdocimi; José Alfredo Samaniego; Amhed Missael Vargas Velazquez; Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez; Paula F Campos; Bent Petersen; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; An Pas; Tom Bailey; Paul Scofield; Michael Bunce; David M Lambert; Qi Zhou; Polina Perelman; Amy C Driskell; Beth Shapiro; Zijun Xiong; Yongli Zeng; Shiping Liu; Zhenyu Li; Binghang Liu; Kui Wu; Jin Xiao; Xiong Yinqi; Qiuemei Zheng; Yong Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Linnea Smeds; Frank E Rheindt; Michael Braun; Jon Fjeldsa; Ludovic Orlando; F Keith Barker; Knud Andreas Jønsson; Warren Johnson; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Stephen O'Brien; David Haussler; Oliver A Ryder; Carsten Rahbek; Eske Willerslev; Gary R Graves; Travis C Glenn; John McCormack; Dave Burt; Hans Ellegren; Per Alström; Scott V Edwards; Alexandros Stamatakis; David P Mindell; Joel Cracraft; Edward L Braun; Tandy Warnow; Wang Jun; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  28 in total

1.  Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve the Phylogeny of Flightless Birds (Palaeognathae) in the Presence of an Empirical Anomaly Zone.

Authors:  Alison Cloutier; Timothy B Sackton; Phil Grayson; Michele Clamp; Allan J Baker; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 2.  Divergence and gene flow among Darwin's finches: A genome-wide view of adaptive radiation driven by interspecies allele sharing.

Authors:  Daniela H Palmer; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Authors:  Cuong Cao Dang; Bui Quang Minh; Hanon McShea; Joanna Masel; Jennifer Eleanor James; Le Sy Vinh; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 9.160

4.  Olfactory receptor subgenome and expression in a highly olfactory procellariiform seabird.

Authors:  Simon Yung Wa Sin; Alison Cloutier; Gabrielle Nevitt; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis; Siavash Mirarab; Andre J Aberer; Bo Li; Peter Houde; Cai Li; Simon Y W Ho; Brant C Faircloth; Benoit Nabholz; Jason T Howard; Alexander Suh; Claudia C Weber; Rute R da Fonseca; Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez; Nitish Narula; Liang Liu; Dave Burt; Hans Ellegren; Scott V Edwards; Alexandros Stamatakis; David P Mindell; Joel Cracraft; Edward L Braun; Tandy Warnow; Wang Jun; M Thomas Pius Gilbert; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Temporal Dynamics of Avian Populations during Pleistocene Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Krystyna Nadachowska-Brzyska; Cai Li; Linnea Smeds; Guojie Zhang; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Avianbase: a community resource for bird genomics.

Authors:  Lél Eöry; M Thomas P Gilbert; Cai Li; Bo Li; Alan Archibald; Bronwen L Aken; Guojie Zhang; Erich Jarvis; Paul Flicek; David W Burt
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Computing the Internode Certainty and Related Measures from Partial Gene Trees.

Authors:  Kassian Kobert; Leonidas Salichos; Antonis Rokas; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The Dynamics of Incomplete Lineage Sorting across the Ancient Adaptive Radiation of Neoavian Birds.

Authors:  Alexander Suh; Linnéa Smeds; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Ancient horizontal transfers of retrotransposons between birds and ancestors of human pathogenic nematodes.

Authors:  Alexander Suh; Christopher C Witt; Juliana Menger; Keren R Sadanandan; Lars Podsiadlowski; Michael Gerth; Anne Weigert; Jimmy A McGuire; Joann Mudge; Scott V Edwards; Frank E Rheindt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.