| Literature DB >> 25741349 |
Lekha Pazhamala1, Rachit K Saxena1, Vikas K Singh1, C V Sameerkumar1, Vinay Kumar1, Pallavi Sinha1, Kishan Patel1, Jimmy Obala2, Seleman R Kaoneka2, P Tongoona3, Hussein A Shimelis3, N V P R Gangarao4, Damaris Odeny4, Abhishek Rathore1, P S Dharmaraj5, K N Yamini6, Rajeev K Varshney7.
Abstract
Pigeonpea is an important pulse crop grown predominantly in the tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. Although pigeonpea growing area has considerably increased, yield has remained stagnant for the last six decades mainly due to the exposure of the crop to various biotic and abiotic constraints. In addition, low level of genetic variability and limited genomic resources have been serious impediments to pigeonpea crop improvement through modern breeding approaches. In recent years, however, due to the availability of next generation sequencing and high-throughput genotyping technologies, the scenario has changed tremendously. The reduced sequencing costs resulting in the decoding of the pigeonpea genome has led to the development of various genomic resources including molecular markers, transcript sequences and comprehensive genetic maps. Mapping of some important traits including resistance to Fusarium wilt and sterility mosaic disease, fertility restoration, determinacy with other agronomically important traits have paved the way for applying genomics-assisted breeding (GAB) through marker assisted selection as well as genomic selection (GS). This would accelerate the development and improvement of both varieties and hybrids in pigeonpea. Particularly for hybrid breeding programme, mitochondrial genomes of cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lines, maintainers and hybrids have been sequenced to identify genes responsible for cytoplasmic male sterility. Furthermore, several diagnostic molecular markers have been developed to assess the purity of commercial hybrids. In summary, pigeonpea has become a genomic resources-rich crop and efforts have already been initiated to integrate these resources in pigeonpea breeding.Entities:
Keywords: genetic variability; genomic resources; genomic selection; genomics-assisted breeding; marker assisted selection; pigeonpea
Year: 2015 PMID: 25741349 PMCID: PMC4330709 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Different wild species of pigeonpea useful for rendering valuable traits.
| Resistance to pests | Pod borer | Sharma et al., | |
| Saxena and Sharma, | |||
| Sharma, | |||
| Rao et al., | |||
| Kulkarni et al., | |||
| Sujana et al., | |||
| Pod fly | Sharma et al., | ||
| Mallikarjuna et al., | |||
| Sharma et al., | |||
| Bruchids | Jadhav et al., | ||
| Mallikarjuna et al., | |||
| Resistance to diseases | Fusarium wilt | Mallikarjuna et al., | |
| Sterility mosaic disease | Akinola and Whiteman, | ||
| Singh et al., | |||
| Phytophthora blight | Mallikarjuna et al., | ||
| Akinola and Whiteman, | |||
| Grain quality | High protein content | Akinola and Whiteman, | |
| Dalvi et al., | |||
| High seed weight | Jadhav et al., | ||
| Cytoplasmic male sterility | - | Tikka et al., | |
| Saxena and Kumar, | |||
| Ariyanayagam et al., | |||
| Wanjari et al., | |||
| Saxena et al., | |||
| Saxena et al., | |||
| Mallikarjuna et al., | |||
| Tolerance to abiotic stresses | Salinity | Subbarao et al., | |
| Srivastava et al., | |||
| Drought | Subbarao et al., | ||
| Rao et al., | |||
| Srivastava et al., | |||
| Water-logging | Krishnamurthy et al., | ||
| Plant type | Extra-early flowering maturity | Mallikarjuna and Moss, | |
| Saxena, | |||
| Photo-insensitivity | Mallikarjuna and Moss, | ||
| Cleistogamy | Saxena et al., | ||
Genetic resources available for mapping different traits in pigeonpea.
| Intra-specific F2 | ICPB 2049 × ICPL 99050 | Bohra et al., | |
| F2 | GSl × ICPL 87119 | Kotresh et al., | |
| GS1 × ICP 8863 | |||
| Sterility mosaic disease resistance | Intra-specific F2 | ICP 8863 × ICPL 20097 | Gnanesh et al., |
| TTB 7 × ICP 7035 | |||
| Fertility restoration | F2 | ICPA 2039 × ICPR 2447 | Bohra et al., |
| ICPA 2043 × ICPR 3467 | |||
| ICPA 2043 × ICPR 2671 | |||
| Pod borer | Inter-specific F2 | ICPL 8755 × ICPL 227 | Saxena et al., |
| ICPL 151 × ICPL 87 | |||
| ICP 28 × ICPW 94 | |||
| Drought tolerance | Inter-specific F2 | ICPL 8755 × ICPL 227 | Saxena et al., |
| ICPL 151 × ICPL 87 | |||
| ICP 28 × ICPW 94 | |||
| Determinacy | F2 | ICPL 85010 × ICP 15774 | Mir et al., |
| Plant type | F2 | TT44-4 × TDT2004-1 | Dhanasekar et al., |
| Plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods, days to maturity and days to flowering | F2 | Pusa Dwarf × HDM04-1 | Kumawat et al., |
Figure 1A glimpse of the pigeonpea genomics research. The figure depicts the present scenario in terms of major genomic resources developed during the last decade that would lead to pigeonpea crop improvement. There were very few markers and with no mapping population developed before Pigeonpea Genomics Initiative (PGI). Since the inception of PGI in 2006, progress were made in developing various genetic and genomic resources, including different inter- and intra-specific mapping populations, molecular markers, genetic maps and transcriptome assemblies. In 2012, the pigeonpea genome was decoded which has been a milestone in pigeonpea research. In the present scenario, efforts have been initiated to deploy genomic-assisted breeding for pigeonpea improvement.
Genomic resources generated through transcriptome sequencing in pigeonpea.
| 5085 unigenes | Sanger | ICPL 20102, ICP 2376, ICP 7035 and TTB 7 | 84 | 102 | - | Raju et al., |
| 0.12 million tentative unique sequences + 150.8 million sequence reads | Sanger FLX/454 | ICPL 87119, ICPL 99050, ICPL 87091, ICPB 2049, ICPL 20096, ICPL 7035, BSMR 736, ICPL 332, TTB 7, TAT 10 and ICP 28 | 50,566 | 12,141 | 5,845 | Dubey et al., |
| Illumina | ||||||
| 1.696 million sequence reads | FLX/454 | ICPL 87119 and UPAS 120 | 3,771 | - | - | Dutta et al., |
| 131 million sequence reads + 18353 unigenes | Illumina | - | - | - | 6,284 | Kudapa et al., |
| FLX/454 | ||||||
| Sanger | ||||||
| 128.9 million sequence reads | Illumina | ICPL 87119, ICPL 87091, BSMR 736, TAT 10, ICP 7035, TTB 7, ICPL 332, ICPL 20096, ICPB 2049, ICPL 99050, ICP 28 and ICPW 94 | - | - | 17,113 | Saxena et al., |
SSR, Simple Sequence Repeat; SNP, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; ISR, Intron Spanning Region.
Select set of ESTs/candidate genes identified in pigeonpea.
| Root | ICPL 20102 | 19 | Sanger | Raju et al., | ||
| ICP 2376 | ||||||
| Sterility mosaic Disease | Leaf | ICP 7035 | 20 | Sanger | Raju et al., | |
| TTB 7 | ||||||
| Root | ICPB 2049 | 99 | Illumina | Dubey et al., | ||
| ICPL 99050 | ||||||
| ICPL 87119 | ||||||
| ICPL 87091 | ||||||
| Sterility Mosaic Disease | Leaf | BSMR 736 | 13 | Illumina | Dubey et al., | |
| TAT 10 | ||||||
| ICPL 20096 | ||||||
| ICPL 332 TTB 7 | ||||||
| ICPL 7035 | ||||||
| PEG/water-deficit stress | Root Leaf | ICP 8744 | Homology | Priyanka et al., | ||
| Drought, salinity and extreme temperatures | ICP 8744 | Homology | Sekhar et al., | |||
| Heavy metal stress | ICP 8744 | Homology | Sekhar et al., | |||
| Drought | Root | ICPL 8755 | - | Microarray | Saxena et al., | |
| ICPL 227 | ||||||
| ICPL 151 | ||||||
| Drought, salt and cold | Root Leaf | ICPL 87 | Homology | Tamirisa et al., | ||
| ICP 8744 | ||||||
| Drought | Leaf | ICPL 87119 | RT-PCR | Deeplanaik et al., | ||
| Determinacy | Root-tip Flower | ICPA 2039 | Homology | Mir et al., | ||
| ICPL 87118 |
.
Figure 2Future directions for genomics-assisted breeding in pigeonpea. The figure illustrates a roadmap for the utilization of various genetic and genomic resources for deploying genomics-assisted breeding for pigeonpea improvement. In order to accelerate the existing breeding efforts, the strategy has been given in the figure which will be followed in the coming years.