William E Haley1, David L Roth2, Martha Hovater2, Olivio J Clay2. 1. From the School of Aging Studies (W.E.H.), University of South Florida, Tampa; the Center on Aging and Health (D.L.R.), Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (M.H.), and the Department of Psychology (O.J.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham. whaley@usf.edu. 2. From the School of Aging Studies (W.E.H.), University of South Florida, Tampa; the Center on Aging and Health (D.L.R.), Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (M.H.), and the Department of Psychology (O.J.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Three-year changes in well-being were studied among family caregivers of an epidemiologically derived sample of stroke survivors from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study and compared to matched noncaregivers. METHODS: Family caregivers of REGARDS participants who experienced a stroke event completed telephone interviews assessing depressive symptoms, mental and physical health quality of life (QOL), life satisfaction, and leisure satisfaction at approximately 9, 18, 27, and 36 months after the stroke (n = 235). For each stroke caregiver, a family member of a stroke-free REGARDS participant was enrolled as a matched noncaregiving control (n = 235) and completed similar interviews. RESULTS: Multilevel longitudinal models found that caregivers showed poorer well-being at 9 months poststroke than controls on all measures except physical health QOL. Significant differences were sustained for 22 months after the stroke event for depressive symptoms, 31 months for mental health QOL, and 15 months for life satisfaction. For leisure satisfaction, differences were still significant at 36 months poststroke. Caregiving effects were similar across race and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke caregiving is associated with persistent psychological distress, but life satisfaction, depression, and mental health QOL became comparable to noncaregivers by 3 years after stroke. Caregiver leisure satisfaction was chronically lower than in noncaregivers. Intervention for stroke caregivers should recognize both the strains faced by caregivers and their capacity for successful coping over time.
OBJECTIVE: Three-year changes in well-being were studied among family caregivers of an epidemiologically derived sample of stroke survivors from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study and compared to matched noncaregivers. METHODS: Family caregivers of REGARDS participants who experienced a stroke event completed telephone interviews assessing depressive symptoms, mental and physical health quality of life (QOL), life satisfaction, and leisure satisfaction at approximately 9, 18, 27, and 36 months after the stroke (n = 235). For each stroke caregiver, a family member of a stroke-free REGARDS participant was enrolled as a matched noncaregiving control (n = 235) and completed similar interviews. RESULTS: Multilevel longitudinal models found that caregivers showed poorer well-being at 9 months poststroke than controls on all measures except physical health QOL. Significant differences were sustained for 22 months after the stroke event for depressive symptoms, 31 months for mental health QOL, and 15 months for life satisfaction. For leisure satisfaction, differences were still significant at 36 months poststroke. Caregiving effects were similar across race and sex. CONCLUSIONS:Stroke caregiving is associated with persistent psychological distress, but life satisfaction, depression, and mental health QOL became comparable to noncaregivers by 3 years after stroke. Caregiver leisure satisfaction was chronically lower than in noncaregivers. Intervention for stroke caregivers should recognize both the strains faced by caregivers and their capacity for successful coping over time.
Authors: R R Williams; S C Hunt; G Heiss; M A Province; J T Bensen; M Higgins; R M Chamberlain; J Ware; P N Hopkins Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-01-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Mary Cushman; Leavonne Pulley; Camilo R Gomez; Rodney C Go; Ronald J Prineas; Andra Graham; Claudia S Moy; George Howard Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2005-06-29 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: David L Roth; William E Haley; Olivio J Clay; Martinique Perkins; Joan S Grant; J David Rhodes; Virginia G Wadley; Brett Kissela; George Howard Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: David L Roth; Orla C Sheehan; Jin Huang; James D Rhodes; Suzanne E Judd; Meredith Kilgore; Brett Kissela; Janet Prvu Bettger; William E Haley Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Lissi Hansen; Karen S Lyons; Nathan F Dieckmann; Michael F Chang; Shirin Hiatt; Emma Solanki; Christopher S Lee Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Barbara J Lutz; Mary Ellen Young; Kerry Rae Creasy; Crystal Martz; Lydia Eisenbrandt; Jarrett N Brunny; Christa Cook Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2017-10-01