| Literature DB >> 25740174 |
Seishi Ikeda1, Takeshi Tokida, Hirofumi Nakamura, Hidemitsu Sakai, Yasuhiro Usui, Takashi Okubo, Kanako Tago, Kentaro Hayashi, Yasuyo Sekiyama, Hiroshi Ono, Satoru Tomita, Masahito Hayatsu, Toshihiro Hasegawa, Kiwamu Minamisawa.
Abstract
Rice shoot-associated bacterial communities at the panicle initiation stage were characterized and their responses to elevated surface water-soil temperature (ET), low nitrogen (LN), and free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) were assessed by clone library analyses of the 16S rRNA gene. Principal coordinate analyses combining all sequence data for leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria revealed that each bacterial community had a distinct structure, as supported by PC1 (61.5%), that was mainly attributed to the high abundance of Planctomycetes in leaf sheaths. Our results also indicated that the community structures of leaf blade-associated bacteria were more sensitive than those of leaf sheath-associated bacteria to the environmental factors examined. Among these environmental factors, LN strongly affected the community structures of leaf blade-associated bacteria by increasing the relative abundance of Bacilli. The most significant effect of FACE was also observed on leaf blade-associated bacteria under the LN condition, which was explained by decreases and increases in Agrobacterium and Pantoea, respectively. The community structures of leaf blade-associated bacteria under the combination of FACE and ET were more similar to those of the control than to those under ET or FACE. Thus, the combined effects of environmental factors need to be considered in order to realistically assess the effects of environmental changes on microbial community structures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25740174 PMCID: PMC4356464 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Experimental design of free-air CO2 enrichment, elevated surface water-soil temperature and low nitrogen
| Atmosphere | Ambient | FACE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Temperature | Ambient | Elevated | Ambient | Ambient | Elevated | Ambient |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fertilization | Standard | Standard | Low nitrogen | Standard | Standard | Low nitrogen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Plot name | AMBI-NT | AMBI-ET | AMBI-LN | FACE-NT | FACE-ET | FACE-LN |
Rice plants grown under the free-air CO2 enrichment condition.
Rice plants grown in elevated surface water-soil temperature (2°C above abient temperature).
Rice plants grown with no nitrogen fertilization.
Chemical characteristics of bulk soil sampleda
| Plot name | NO3 -N | NH4 -N | Total N (%) | Total C (%) | pH (H2 O) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBI-NT | 5.0±4.3 | 36.9±37.3 | 0.20±0.02 | 1.8±0.2 | 5.9±0.2 |
| AMBI-ET | 2.7±0.6 | 34.4±10.6 | 0.19±0.03 | 1.9±0.2 | 5.9±0.2 |
| AMBI-LN | 6.3±0.6 | 11.5±2.1 | 0.17±0.04 | 1.6±0.4 | 5.9±0.1 |
| FACE-NT | 6.6±3.8 | 38.6±12.2 | 0.22±0.03 | 2.1±0.3 | 5.9±0.2 |
| FACE-ET | 3.5±1.7 | 35.7±6.9 | 0.22±0.04 | 2.1±0.4 | 5.9±0.1 |
| FACE-LN | 4.8±4.4 | 21.3±12.3 | 0.20±0.02 | 2.0±0.2 | 5.9±0.1 |
The average of 4 replicated plots±standard deviation.
Sample name stands for the combination of following environmental factors; AMBI, ambient CO2 ; FACE, free air CO2 enrichment; NT, normal surface water-soil temperature; ET, elevated surface water-soil temperature; LN, no nitrogen fertilization. See the main text for the detailed description for abbreviations of environmental factors. Soil samples were taken from depths of 1–10 cm.
μg g−1 dry soil.
Tiller density and dry mass by organs, root:shoot ratio and total dry mass of rice plants measured at around the panicle initiation stage (July 5) in the normal surface water-soil temperaure (NT), elevated surface water-soil temperature (ET) and low nitrogen (LN) plots nested in the CO2 treatments (ambient and FACE).
| Split-plot-factor | Tiller density (/m2) | Leaf blade dry mass (g/m2) | Stem & sheath dry mass (g/m2) | Root dry mass (g/m2) | Root:shoot ratio | Total dry mass (g/m2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ambient | FACE | Sig | Ambient | FACE | Sig | Ambient | FACE | Sig | Ambient | FACE | Sig | Ambient | FACE | Sig | Ambient | FACE | Sig | |
| AT | 471 | 554 | b | 112 | 131 | b | 138 | 164 | b | 54 | 58 | a | 0.22 | 0.20 | a | 304 | 353 | b |
| ET | 535 | 586 | b | 139 | 157 | c | 158 | 192 | c | 59 | 65 | a | 0.20 | 0.19 | a | 355 | 414 | c |
| LN | 393 | 422 | a | 84 | 94 | a | 110 | 132 | a | 54 | 60 | a | 0.28 | 0.26 | b | 248 | 286 | a |
| Analysis of Variance Results | ||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 | + (0.082) | + (0.063) | ns (0.186) | ns (0.31) | ||||||||||||||
| Split-factor (S) | ns | |||||||||||||||||
| CO2 x S | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||||||||||
The split-plot factors followed by the same letters in each column were not significantly different (P>0.05) by the Tukey’s method.
indicate that the effects were significant at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively.
Statistical characteristics of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries derived from rice shoot-associated bacteria under various environmental conditions
| Tissues | Leaf blade | Leaf sheath | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Growth air conditions | Ambient | FACE | Ambient | FACE | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Plots | AT | ET | LN | AT | ET | LN | AT | ET | LN | AT | ET | LN |
| Statistics | ||||||||||||
| No. of sequences | 146 | 162 | 124 | 151 | 151 | 126 | 164 | 174 | 180 | 168 | 178 | 181 |
| No. of OTUs (≥97% identity) | 47 | 50 | 44 | 46 | 49 | 32 | 77 | 76 | 78 | 81 | 82 | 82 |
| No. of singletons | 29 | 34 | 30 | 32 | 32 | 19 | 52 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 58 | 54 |
| Library coverage (%) | 80.1 | 79 | 75.8 | 78.8 | 78.8 | 84.9 | 68.3 | 71.3 | 72.2 | 67.3 | 67.4 | 70.2 |
| Diversity indexes | ||||||||||||
| Chao1 | 114.7 | 130.1 | 98.4 | 128.7 | 119.9 | 74.8 | 209.6 | 187.4 | 180.0 | 216.0 | 288.6 | 241.0 |
| ACE | 148.9 | 179.5 | 105.6 | 290.7 | 224.8 | 60.5 | 332.3 | 289.3 | 367.6 | 397.8 | 398.7 | 280.1 |
| Shannon index ( | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 |
| Simpson index (1/ | 9.1 | 5.2 | 9.6 | 5.9 | 8.1 | 3.7 | 40.5 | 33.1 | 39.3 | 46.1 | 36.2 | 37.5 |
Rice plants grown under ambient atmosphere condition.
Rice plants grown under the free-air CO2 enrichment condition.
Rice plants grown in ambientl surface water-soil temperature with standard nitrogen fertilization.
Rice plants grown in elevated surface water-soil temperature (2°C above AT) with standard nitrogen fertilization.
Rice plants grown in ambient surface water-soil temperature with no nitrogen fertilization.
OTUs were defined at ≥97% sequence identity.
Coverage (C) = 1 − (n/N), where n is the number of singletons that are encountered only once in a library and N is the total number of clones.
Fig. 1Principal-coordinates analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria under ambient (AMBI) and FACE conditions. The ordination was constructed from all sequence data using UniFrac distances weighted by the relative abundance. NT, normal surface water-soil temperature with standard nitrogen fertilization; ET, elevated surface water-soil temperature (+2°C from NT) with standard nitrogen fertilization; LN, NT with no nitrogen fertilization. The left cluster consists of leaf blade-associated bacteria and the right cluster shows leaf sheath-associated bacteria. The arrow indicates a community shift described in the text. The shaded circle emphasizes the high similarity of community structures between the control (AMBI-NT) and FACE-ET.
Phylogenetic compositions of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries derived from leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria in rice plants cultivated under different environmental conditions
| Relative abundance in a clone library (%) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Tissues | Leaf blade | Leaf sheath | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Atmospheric conditions | AMBI | FACE | AMBI | FACE | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Temperature | NT | ET | LN | NT | ET | LN | NT | ET | LN | NT | ET | LN |
| Proteobacteria | 74.0 | 71.0 | 57.3 | 88.7 | 77.5 | 76.2 | 51.8 | 58.0 | 61.7 | 51.2 | 59.0 | 59.7 |
| Alphaproteobacteria | 30.8 | 19.1 | 24.2 | 33.1 | 31.1 | 15.9 | 29.9 | 29.9 | 32.8 | 29.8 | 29.2 | 33.7 |
| Betaproteobacteria | 3.4 | 5.6 | — | 8.6 | 7.9 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 9.2 | 5.0 | 7.7 | 10.7 | 3.3 |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 37.7 | 46.3 | 32.3 | 45.0 | 37.1 | 58.7 | 14.0 | 13.8 | 22.2 | 11.3 | 15.2 | 18.2 |
| Deltaproteobacteria | 2.1 | — | 0.8 | — | — | — | 0.6 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 1.1 |
| Planctomycetes | 1.4 | 3.7 | — | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 30.5 | 27.6 | 20.0 | 25.6 | 22.5 | 22.6 |
| Firmicutes | 17.1 | 19.2 | 36.3 | 7.9 | 13.9 | 15.1 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 3.6 |
| Bacilli | 11.6 | 15.5 | 27.4 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 13.5 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 1.7 |
| Clostridia | 5.5 | 3.7 | 8.9 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.2 |
| Actinobacteria | 2.7 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.8 | — | 1.7 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | — | — | — | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| Acidobacteria | — | — | — | — | — | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | — | 0.6 |
| Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast | — | — | — | — | 0.7 | — | 0.6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Chloroflexi | — | — | 0.8 | 0.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BRC1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.6 | — | — |
| Unclassified bacteria | 4.1 | 4.9 | 1.6 | — | 2.6 | 5.6 | 9.1 | 8.0 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.1 | 8.3 |
indicate statistical significance at the 1 and 5% levels (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), respectively, calculated with the Library Compare of RDP II, between the control (AMBI-NT) and other samples.
Rice plants grown under ambient atmosphere condition.
Rice plants grown under the free-air CO2 enrichment condition.
Rice plants grown in normal surface water-soil temperature with standard nitrogen fertilization.
Rice plants grown in elevated surface water-soil temperature (2°C above NT) with standard nitrogen fertilization.
Rice plants grown in normal surface water-soil temerature with low nitrogen fertilization.
Fig. 2Phylogenetic distribution of OTUs for Alphaproteobacteria responding to environmental factors in the 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of rice leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria under ambient and FACE conditions. The dendrogram indicates the phylogenetic relationships among the representative sequences of OTUs (defined by ≥97% identity). The table indicates the relative abundance of clones belonging to each OTU in each library and the results of a BLAST search using the representative sequences. ** and * indicate significant differences between the control (ambient CO2 with normal temperature and standard nitrogen level) and other samples at P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively. Shading indicates OTUs described in the main text.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic distribution of OTUs for Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria responding to environmental factors in the 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of rice leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria under ambient and FACE conditions. The dendrogram indicates the phylogenetic relationships among the representative sequences of OTUs (defined by ≥97% identity). The table indicates the relative abundance of clones belonging to each OTU in each library and the results of a BLAST search using the representative sequences. ** and * indicate significant differences between the control (ambient CO2 with normal temperature and standard nitrogen level) and other samples at P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively. Shading indicates OTUs described in the main text.
Fig. 4Phylogenetic distribution of OTUs for Bacilli responding to environmental factors in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of rice leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria under ambient and FACE conditions. The dendrogram indicates the phylogenetic relationships among the representative sequences of OTUs (defined by ≥97% identity). The table indicates the relative abundance of clones belonging to each OTU in each library and the results of a BLAST search using the representative sequences. ** and * indicate significant differences between the control (ambient CO2 with normal temperature and standard nitrogen level) and other samples at P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively. Shading indicates OTUs described in the main text.
Fig. 5Phylogenetic distribution of OTUs for Planctomycetes responding to environmental factors in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of rice leaf blade- and leaf sheath-associated bacteria under ambient and FACE conditions. The dendrogram indicates the phylogenetic relationships among the representative sequences of OTUs (defined by ≥97% identity). The table indicates the relative abundance of clones belonging to each OTU in each library and the results of a BLAST search using the representative sequences. ** and * indicate significant differences between the control (ambient CO2 with normal temperature and standard nitrogen level) and other samples at P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively. Shading indicates OTUs described in the main text.
Fig. 7Phylogenetic tree of rice shoot-associated Planctomycetes based on representative sequences of OTUs in clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method. The scale represents 0.05 substitutions per site. The numbers at the nodes are the proportions of 1,000 bootstrap resamplings, and values <50% are not shown. The OTUs described in the main text are indicated in bold.
Fig. 6Principal-coordinates analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of rice shoot-associated bacteria under ambient (AMBI) and FACE conditions. The ordinations were separately constructed for leaf blades (A, B) and leaf sheaths (C, D) using UniFrac distances weighted by the relative abundance. NT, normal surface water and soil temperature with standard nitrogen fertilization; ET, elevated surface water and soil temperature (+2°C from NT) with standard nitrogen fertilization; LN, NT with no nitrogen fertilization. The arrow indicates a community shift described in the text. The shaded circle emphasizes the high similarity of community structures between the control (AMBI-NT) and FACE-ET.