| Literature DB >> 35650110 |
Seishi Ikeda1, Kazuyuki Okazaki1, Hirohito Tsurumaru2, Takanori Suzuki3, Masayuki Hirafuji4.
Abstract
The effects of different types of additional fertilizations (a compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei) on the root-associated microbes of napa cabbage grown in an Andosol field were investigated by molecular community ana-lyses. Most of the closest known species of the bacterial sequences whose relative abundance significantly differed among fertilizers were sensitive to nitrogen fertilization and/or related to the geochemical cycles of nitrogen. The fungal community on the roots of napa cabbage was dominated by two genera, Bipolaris and Olpidium. The relative abundance of these two genera was affected by the types of fertilizers to some extent and showed a strong negative correlation.Entities:
Keywords: Additional fertilization; Bipolaris; Microbial community analysis; Napa cabbage root; Olpidium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35650110 PMCID: PMC9530736 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME22013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.596
Comparisons of growth parameters of napa cabbage heads between compound fertilizer and Chida-kasei plots
| Fertilization plotsa | Short | Weight of all | Head weight | Weight of outer | Ratio to head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 52 ( | 2.52 | 1.57 | 0.95 | 62.2 |
| CK | 55** ( | 2.83* | 1.97*** | 0.86 | 69.5** |
a CO and CK indicate the compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei plots, respectively.
b (Weight of all above-ground tissue)–(Weight of outer leaves).
c (Head weight) (Weight of all above-ground tissue)–1×100.
*, **, and *** indicate a significant difference with a t-test at P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.001, respectively.
All traits were examined on December 18, 2020, except for the short diameter of the head, which was measured on November 5, 2020.
Bacterial groups showing significant differences in relative abundance between compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei plots
| Taxona | Relative abundance (%)b | Fold change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| COc | CK | ||
| Class | |||
| | 14.66±0.68 | 12.66±1.18* | 0.86 |
| | 0±0 | 0.09±0.09* | — |
| Order | |||
| | 7.72±0.32 | 6.76±0.64* | 0.88 |
| | 0.05±0.03 | 0±0* | — |
| | 0.27±0.22 | 0.04±0.09* | 0.16 |
| Family | |||
| | 4.11±0.36 | 3.37±0.41* | 0.82 |
| | 0.09±0.09 | 0.33±0.10* | 3.55 |
| | 0.19±0.16 | 0±0* | — |
| Genus | |||
| | 3.26±0.18 | 2.56±0.26** | 0.79 |
| | 0.22±0.23 | 0±0* | — |
| | 1.61±0.82 | 0.37±0.67* | 0.23 |
| Species | |||
| | 1.53±0.37 | 0.92±0.16* | 0.60 |
| ASVd | |||
| ASV-B1 ( | 0.24±0.11 | 0.06±0.07* | 0.25 |
| | 0.16±0.24 | 0.91±0.26* | 5.58 |
| ASV-B3 ( | 0.84±0.61 | 0±0* | — |
| | 0±0 | 0.51±0.05*** | — |
| ASV-B5 ( | 1.00±0.90 | 0±0* | — |
| | 0.18±0.36 | 0.68±0.13* | 3.81 |
| | 0±0 | 0.16±0.12* | — |
| | 0±0 | 0.20±0.16* | — |
| ASV-B9 ( | 0.28±0.21 | 0±0* | — |
| | 0.07±0.10 | 0.33±0.10* | 4.88 |
| ASV-B11 ( | 1.08±0.11 | 0.77±0.14* | 0.71 |
a When the same value for relative abundance was obtained at different taxonomic levels for a bacterial group, only the lowest taxonomic group was shown. Bacterial groups showing a higher abundance in the CK plot than in the CO plot are shown in bold font.
b Relative abundance (%) is calculated based on 2,927 reads per sample and the results of the average and S.D. (n=4) for each of the fertilization conditions are shown.
c CO and CK indicate the compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei plots, respectively.
d The closest taxon to a representative sequence of an ASV is shown in parentheses.
*, *, and *** indicate a significant difference between the CO and CK plots at P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.001, respectively.
Fungal groups showing significant differences in relative abundance between compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei plots
| Taxona | Relative abundance (%)b | Fold change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| COc | CK | ||
| Family | |||
| | 83.9±8.6 | 50.5±13.0** | 0.60 |
| | 0±0 | 0.12±0.09* | — |
| Genus | |||
| | 83.5±8.6 | 50.2±13.3** | 0.60 |
| | 9.1±10.0 | 43.9±15.4** | 4.84 |
| OTUd | |||
| OTU-F1 ( | 1.60±0.29 | 0.97±0.35* | 0.61 |
| OTU-F2 ( | 0.47±0.12 | 0.26±0.10* | 0.55 |
| OTU-F3 ( | 0.63±0.10 | 0.26±0.05*** | 0.40 |
| OTU-F4 ( | 0.82±0.24 | 0.43±0.18* | 0.53 |
| OTU-F5 ( | 0.19±0.07 | 0.08±0.02* | 0.43 |
| OTU-F6 ( | 0.04±0 | 0.01±0.02* | 0.25 |
| OTU-F7 ( | 2.74±0.05 | 1.82±0.35** | 0.66 |
| OTU-F8 ( | 0.04±0.03 | 0±0* | — |
| OTU-F9 ( | 0.64±0.17 | 0.34±0.13* | 0.52 |
| OTU-F10 ( | 0.13±0.07 | 0.03±0.03* | 0.20 |
| OTU-F11 ( | 0.07±0.03 | 0.01±0.02** | 0.13 |
| OTU-F12 ( | 0.29±0.08 | 0.11±0.06* | 0.36 |
| OTU-F13 ( | 50.14±5.24 | 30.25±7.36** | 0.60 |
| OTU-F14 ( | 0.18±0.06 | 0.07±0.04* | 0.40 |
| OTU-F15 ( | 0.09±0.06 | 0.02±0.02* | 0.20 |
| OTU-F16 ( | 0.06±0.02 | 0.04±0* | 0.57 |
| OTU-F17 ( | 0.41±0.05 | 0.19±0.03*** | 0.46 |
| OTU-F18 ( | 0.04±0.03 | 0±0* | — |
| | 0±0 | 0.30±0.24* | — |
| | 9.07±10.0 | 43.9±15.4** | 4.84 |
a When the same or a similar value for relative abundance was obtained at different taxonomic levels for a fungal group, only the lowest taxonomic group was shown. Fungal groups showing a higher abundance in the CK plot than in the CO plot are shown in bold font.
b Relative abundance (%) is calculated based on 2,835 reads per sample and the results of the average and S.D. (n=4) for each of the fertilization conditions are shown.
c CO and CK indicate the compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei plots, respectively.
d The closest taxon to the sequence of an OTU is shown in parentheses.
*, *, and *** indicate a significant difference between the CO and CK plots at P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.001, respectively.
Fig. 1.Correlation plot of the relative abundance of Bipolaris and Olpidium. Panel A: Correlation plot at the genus level. Panel B: Correlation plot at the OTU level. *** indicates a significant difference at P<0.001.
Relationships between plant growth parameters of napa cabbage and the relative abundance of napa cabbage root-associated microbes showing a significant difference between compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei plots
| Taxona | Weight of all | Head weight | Ratio to head | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P, N | R2 | P, N | R2 | P, N | R2 | |||
| Bacteria | ||||||||
| | N | 0.42 | N | 0.56* | N | 0.41 | ||
| | N | 0.43 | N | 0.57* | N | 0.46 | ||
| | N | 0.54* | N | 0.77** | N | 0.68* | ||
| | P | 0.17 | P | 0.47 | P | 0.78** | ||
| ASV-B3 ( | N | 0.52* | N | 0.59* | N | 0.45 | ||
| | P | 0.53* | P | 0.53* | P | 0.31 | ||
| Fungi | ||||||||
| | P | 0.43 | P | 0.56* | P | 0.36 | ||
| OTU-F2 ( | N | 0.69* | N | 0.64* | N | 0.27 | ||
| OTU-F3 ( | N | 0.23 | N | 0.50* | N | 0.70** | ||
| OTU-F4 ( | N | 0.19 | N | 0.42 | N | 0.61* | ||
| OTU-F5 ( | N | 0.46 | N | 0.54* | N | 0.44 | ||
| OTU-F8 ( | N | 0.001 | N | 0.15 | N | 0.58* | ||
| OTU-F15 ( | N | 0.50 | N | 0.59* | N | 0.50 | ||
a Microbial groups showing a significantly higher abundance in the CK plot (Chiyoda-kasei) than in the CO plot (a compound fertilizer) are shown in bold font.
b P, N, and R2 indicate a positive correlation, negative correlation, and decision coefficient, respectively.
* and ** indicate a significant difference at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.
Correlations based on a confidence curve of the regression line at P<0.05 are highlighted in gray.