Literature DB >> 25739827

The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer.

Cornelia Bachmann1, Sara Y Brucker, Bernhard Kraemer, Ralf Rothmund, Anette Staebler, Falko Fend, Diethelm Wallwiener, Eva-Maria Grischke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To delineate the relevance of pelvic and para-aortic node involvement in optimally cytoreduced (residual tumour <1 cm) stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients.
METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive optimally cytoreduced (R ≤ 1 cm) patients with primary stage IIIc ovarian cancer underwent stage-related surgery and got adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up: 53.5 months. All patients got systematic lymphadenectomy. On average, 24.7 pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes were removed per patient (range 1-60 nodes). Patients were stratified into three groups to evaluate node involvement (ratio: affected to resected nodes): (1) (=0); (2) (>0-≤ 0.5) >0 and ≤ 50 % of affected nodes; (3) (>0.5-≤ 1) >50 % of affected nodes. Clinical parameters were retrospectively evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value.
RESULTS: Most often serous histology, histologic grade 3 and a node ratio >0-≤ 0.5 (61.1 %) were detected. Complete cytoreduction (R = 0 mm) has significant best prognostic impact compared to R > 0 mm-1 cm (OS: p = 0.047, PFS: p = 0.00). Node involvement was associated with serous histology and grade 3. Increasing node ratio leads to significant decreased OS (p = 0.019) and significant best OS was associated with node ratio >0-≤0.5.
CONCLUSIONS: The goal is optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. More extensive lymphadenectomy seems to play an important role in providing an accurate staging, and the node ratio might give prognostic information. Current prospective studies like the LION study (AGO-Ovar) had to investigate if these data have therapeutic implications and may be considered in future staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25739827     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-1945-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  27 in total

1.  The impact of systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Akiko Abe; Hiroyuki Furumoto; Minoru Irahara; Hiroyasu Ino; Masaharu Kamada; Osamu Naka; Masaru Sasaki; Toshiaki Kagawa; Osamu Okitsu; Norio Kushiki
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suk-Joon Chang; Robert E Bristow; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Angelo Maggioni; Neville Hacker; Fabio Landoni; Sven Ackermann; Elio Campagnutta; Karl Tamussino; Raimund Winter; Antonio Pellegrino; Stefano Greggi; Roberto Angioli; Natalina Manci; Giovanni Scambia; Tiziana Dell'Anna; Roldano Fossati; Irene Floriani; Rita S Rossi; Roberto Grassi; Giuseppe Favalli; Francesco Raspagliesi; Diana Giannarelli; Luca Martella; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Role of lymphadenectomy in the management of grossly apparent advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni D Aletti; Sean Dowdy; Karl C Podratz; William A Cliby
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The prognostic impact of the ratio of positive lymph nodes on survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Haider Mahdi; Melissa Thrall; Sanjeev Kumar; Rabbie Hanna; Shelly Seward; David Lockhart; Robert T Morris; Ron Swensen; Adnan R Munkarah
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Lymph node metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the ovary: review of a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Volkan Ulker; Oguzhan Kuru; Ceyhun Numanoglu; Ozgur Akbayır; Ibrahim Polat; Mehmet Uhri
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO).

Authors:  Andreas du Bois; Alexander Reuss; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Philipp Harter; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jacobus Pfisterer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients.

Authors:  T Onda; H Yoshikawa; T Yasugi; M Mishima; S Nakagawa; M Yamada; K Matsumoto; Y Taketani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients.

Authors:  J K Chan; R Urban; J M Hu; J Y Shin; A Husain; N N Teng; J S Berek; K Osann; D S Kapp
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Improvements to the FIGO staging for ovarian cancer: reconsideration of lymphatic spread and intraoperative tumor rupture.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Tae Hun Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Sun Young Kim; Hee Seung Kim; Taek Sang Lee; Hyun Hoon Chung; Yong-Beom Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of Lymph Node Sampling in Stage II and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with Clinically Negative Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahim Fahim; Abdelmaksoud Mohamed Ali; Rasha Mahmoud Allam
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02

2.  Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Zhen-Yu He; Feng-Yan Li; Jia-Yuan Sun; Huan-Xin Lin; San-Gang Wu; Qiong-Hua Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-16

3.  Lymph node ratio may predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in node-positive cervical cancer.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Qiong-Hua Chen; San-Gang Wu; Zhen-Yu He; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Ke-Li You
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-17

4.  Role of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery for optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer: Reappraisal in the era of radical surgery.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Eoh; Jung-Yun Lee; Jung Won Yoon; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang-Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

5.  Survival effect of different lymph node staging methods on ovarian cancer: An analysis of 10 878 patients.

Authors:  Jieyu Wang; Jun Li; Ruifang Chen; Xin Lu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with small-cell carcinoma of the cervix based on data from a large national registry.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Jia-Yuan Sun; Shan-Yu Chen; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; San-Gang Wu; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.