Literature DB >> 25738009

Community medicine teaching and evaluation: scope of betterment.

S Gopalakrishnan1, P Ganesh Kumar2.   

Abstract

There have been rapid and extensive changes in the way assessment is conducted in medical education. Assessment brings about standardization of the manner in which the syllabus is to be implemented and also gives guidelines regarding the teaching pattern, especially when the student is going to rotate through various departments in a medical college. Community Medicine is an important branch of medicine concerned with the health of populations. Existing forms of assessment of community medicine education mainly consists of internal [formative] assessment and final (summative) examination. Advantages of the present system is the similarity of the methods used for internal assessments and final examinations and is relatively easily done since only the knowledge application and recall ability of the student in theory and practical are assessed. Disadvantages in the current evaluation system are neglecting the assessment of psychomotor, affective and communication skills. Evaluation systems can be improved by implementing techniques to assess psychomotor skills, presentation and communication skills, organizational skills and the student's ability to work in a team. Regular feedback from students should be taken periodically for the betterment of Community Medicine education. This article is meant to sensitise the academic experts in medical education to plan better need based methods of assessment in the subject of Community Medicine, in relation to the new MCI 2012 Regulations, in order to make it a better learning experience for the students.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community medicine; Educational assessment; Medical education; Scope for improvement

Year:  2015        PMID: 25738009      PMCID: PMC4347100          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/9873.5362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  6 in total

1.  Learning and evaluation in medical education.

Authors:  K E Nkanginieme; N Eke
Journal:  Niger Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-03

2.  Incorporating economic reality into medical education.

Authors:  Samuel Y Sessions; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Understanding depression and distress among medical students.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  To the point: medical education reviews evaluation in context: assessing learners, teachers, and training programs.

Authors:  William P Metheny; Eve L Espey; Jessica Bienstock; Susan M Cox; Sonya S Erickson; Alice R Goepfert; Maya M Hammoud; Diane M Hartmann; Paul M Krueger; James J Neutens; Elizabeth Puscheck
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Assessment in medical education.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Academic institutionalization of community health services: way ahead in medical education reforms.

Authors:  Raman Kumar
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2012-01
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Learning from Primary Health Care Centers in Nepal: reflective writings on experiential learning of third year Nepalese medical students.

Authors:  Rolina Dhital; Madhusudan Subedi; Neeti Prasai; Karun Shrestha; Milan Malla; Shambhu Upadhyay
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Critical Review of "Family Health Advisory Services" Assessment in MBBS Training Program in Community Medicine.

Authors:  Kiran Goswami; H Salve; S Malhotra; Y Kumar
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2017-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.