Literature DB >> 25737288

[Mechanical support in cardiogenic shock].

T Graf1, H Thiele.   

Abstract

Treatment of patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still a challenge and mortality rates remain high, approaching 50 %. Hemodynamic stabilization before and/or after early revascularization remains the primary goal in these patients. In addition to hemodynamic support by inotropes and vasopressors, support with mechanical devices such as intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP), percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and complete extracorporeal life support (ECLS) with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be considered. The use of IABP cannot be recommended anymore on a routine basis. Unfortunately, there are no large randomized data from studies evaluating treatment with mechanical support systems compared to standard treatment with respect to the clinical outcome of patients and no head-to-head comparison of different devices is available. Another important open question to be answered is which subgroups of patients may have a benefit from LVAD therapy. Guidelines discourage the routine use of mechanical support as a first-line treatment in CS patients and emphasize that the application should be restricted to those patients with refractory shock. This article gives an overview of the different devices for percutaneous mechanical support in CS and describes the available evidence and guideline recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25737288     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-015-4208-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  33 in total

1.  Cardiogenic shock: to pump or not to pump?

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  The effects of intra-aortic balloon pump support on macrocirculation and tissue microcirculation in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Corstiaan A den Uil; Wim K Lagrand; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Jasper J Brugts; Peter E Spronk; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 1.869

3.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Authors:  Philippe Kolh; Stephan Windecker; Fernando Alfonso; Jean-Philippe Collet; Jochen Cremer; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Hamm; Stuart J Head; Peter Jüni; A Pieter Kappetein; Adnan Kastrati; Juhani Knuuti; Ulf Landmesser; Günther Laufer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Dimitrios J Richter; Patrick Schauerte; Miguel Sousa Uva; Giulio G Stefanini; David Paul Taggart; Lucia Torracca; Marco Valgimigli; William Wijns; Adam Witkowski; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Çetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Miguel Sousa Uva; Stephan Achenbach; John Pepper; Anelechi Anyanwu; Lina Badimon; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Baumbach; Farzin Beygui; Nikolaos Bonaros; Marco De Carlo; Christi Deaton; Dobromir Dobrev; Joel Dunning; Eric Eeckhout; Stephan Gielen; David Hasdai; Paulus Kirchhof; Heyman Luckraz; Heiko Mahrholdt; Gilles Montalescot; Domenico Paparella; Ardawan J Rastan; Marcelo Sanmartin; Paul Sergeant; Sigmund Silber; Juan Tamargo; Jurrien ten Berg; Holger Thiele; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Hans-Otto Wagner; Sven Wassmann; Olaf Wendler; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Gerhard Schuler; Franz-Josef Neumann; Jörg Hausleiter; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Bettina Schwarz; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Suzanne de Waha; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Michael Böhm; Volkhard Kurowski; Bernward Lauer; Hans-Heinrich Minden; Hans-Reiner Figulla; Rüdiger C Braun-Dullaeus; Ruth H Strasser; Kristin Rochor; Sebastian K G Maier; Helge Möllmann; Steffen Schneider; Henning Ebelt; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Impaired microcirculation predicts poor outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Corstiaan A den Uil; Wim K Lagrand; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Jin M Cheng; Peter E Spronk; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Sanne E Hoeks; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Acute microflow changes after stop and restart of intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Christoph Rödiger; Michael Fritzenwanger; Julia Schumm; Alexander Lauten; Hans R Figulla; Markus Ferrari
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Microcirculation in cardiogenic shock: from scientific bystander to therapy target.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Alexander Lauten; Markus Ferrari
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  Percutaneous assist devices in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: Review, meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Romeo; Maria Cristina Acconcia; Domenico Sergi; Alessia Romeo; Simona Francioni; Flavia Chiarotti; Quintilio Caretta
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

2.  Clinical application of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Xuesong Jiang; Zhitao Zhu; Ming Ye; Yan Yan; Junbo Zheng; Qingqing Dai; Lianghe Wen; Huaiquan Wang; Shaofei Lou; Hongmei Ma; Pingwei Ma; Yunlong Li; Tuoyun Yang; Shu Zuo; Ye Tian
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.