Literature DB >> 25736009

Compliance with gastric cancer guidelines is associated with improved outcomes.

David J Worhunsky1, Yifei Ma2, Yulia Zak1, George A Poultsides1, Jeffrey A Norton1, Kim F Rhoads2, Brendan C Visser1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the implementation and effectiveness of NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Gastric Cancer.
PURPOSE: We sought to assess rates of compliance with NCCN Guidelines, specifically stage-specific therapy during the initial episode of care, and to determine its impact on outcomes.
METHODS: The California Cancer Registry was used to identify cases of gastric cancer from 2001 to 2006. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to predict guideline compliance and the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality. Patients with TNM staging or summary stage (SS) were also analyzed separately.
RESULTS: Compliance with NCCN Guidelines occurred in just 45.5% of patients overall. Patients older than 55 years were less likely to receive guideline-compliant care, and compliance was associated with a median survival of 20 versus 7 months for noncompliant care (P<.001). Compliant care was also associated with a 55% decreased hazard of mortality (P<.001). Further analysis revealed that 50% of patients had complete TNM staging versus an SS, and TNM-staged patients were more likely to receive compliant care (odds ratio, 1.59; P<.001). TNM-staged patients receiving compliant care had a median survival of 25.3 months compared with 15.1 months for compliant SS patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with NCCN Guidelines and stage-specific therapy at presentation for the treatment of patients with gastric cancer was poor, which was a significant finding given that compliant care was associated with a 55% reduction in the hazard of death. Additionally, patients with TNM-staged cancer were more likely to receive compliant care, perhaps a result of having received more intensive therapy. Combined with the improved survival among compliant TNM-staged patients, these differences have meaningful implications for health services research.
Copyright © 2015 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25736009     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  12 in total

1.  An audit of referral and treatment patterns of high-risk prostate cancer patients in Alberta.

Authors:  Majed Alghamdi; Amandeep Taggar; Derek Tilley; Marc Kerba; Xanthoula Kostaras; Geoffrey Gotto; Michael Sia
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Analyzing the Impact of Compliance with National Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer Care Using the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Kathryn Jaap; Marcus Fluck; Marie Hunsinger; Jeffrey Wild; Tania Arora; Mohsen Shabahang; Joseph Blansfield
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Geographic variation in surgical practice patterns and outcomes for resected nonmetastatic gastric cancer in Ontario.

Authors:  A L Mahar; A El-Sedfy; M Dixon; M Siddiqui; M Elmi; A Ritter; J Vasilevska-Ristovska; Y Jeong; L Helyer; C Law; B Zagorski; N G Coburn
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Long-Term Outcomes in Laparoscopic D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Large Comprehensive Study Proposing Novel Hypotheses.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Hao Liu; Jiang Yu; Tian Lin; Yan-Feng Hu; Tuan-Jie Li; Guo-Xin Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Guideline adherence and implementation of tumor board therapy recommendations for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Alina Krause; Gertraud Stocker; Ines Gockel; Daniel Seehofer; Albrecht Hoffmeister; Hendrik Bläker; Timm Denecke; Regine Kluge; Florian Lordick; Maren Knödler
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Does Quality of Care Matter? A Study of Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Benedetto Mungo; Miloslawa Stem; Amy K Poupore; Sophia Y Chen; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Guideline-adherent treatment, sociodemographic disparities, and cause-specific survival for endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Victoria E Rodriguez; Alana M W LeBrón; Jenny Chang; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.921

8.  Risk factors for hospital readmission after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Cheng-Le Zhuang; Su-Lin Wang; Dong-Dong Huang; Wen-Yang Pang; Neng Lou; Bi-Cheng Chen; Xiao-Lei Chen; Zhen Yu; Xian Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Saudi lung cancer management guidelines 2017.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Jazieh; Khaled Al Kattan; Ahmed Bamousa; Ashwaq Al Olayan; Ahmed Abdelwarith; Jawaher Ansari; Abdullah Al Twairqi; Turki Al Fayea; Khalid Al Saleh; Hamed Al Husaini; Nafisa Abdelhafiez; Mervat Mahrous; Medhat Faris; Ameen Al Omair; Adnan Hebshi; Salem Al Shehri; Foad Al Dayel; Hanaa Bamefleh; Walid Khalbuss; Sarah Al Ghanem; Shukri Loutfi; Azzam Khankan; Meshael Al Rujaib; Majed Al Ghamdi; Nagwa Ibrahim; Abdulmonem Swied; Mohammad Al Kayait; Marie Datario
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.219

10.  Compliance with National Guidelines on the Treatment of Stage II–IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Regional Cancer Center of Southern China

Authors:  Jia-Xiang Ye; Xia Liang; Jian Wei; Jing Zhou; Yu Liao; Yu-Lei Lu; Xia-Quan Tang; An-Yu Wang; Yong Tang
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.