Literature DB >> 25735917

Outcome of patients with high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and advanced Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) treated with decitabine after azacitidine failure.

Stéphanie Harel1, Amina Cherait1, Céline Berthon2, Christophe Willekens2, Sophie Park3, Marthe Rigal4, Sabine Brechignac1, Sylvain Thépot1, Bruno Quesnel2, Claude Gardin1, Lionel Adès5, Pierre Fenaux5, Thorsten Braun6.   

Abstract

Outcome of patients with high risk MDS and CMML who failed treatment with azacitidine remains poor with a median survival of 6 months, without established therapy available except allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The objective of our study was to evaluate efficacy of decitabine after azacitidine failure in a relatively large patient cohort based on conflicting results with 0-28% response rates (RR) in this setting in small patient series. Thirty-six consecutive high risk MDS and CMML patients who received decitabine after azacitidine failure were retrospectively reviewed. Response was based on IWG 2006 criteria for MDS and CMML with WBC<13G/l and also included for proliferative CMML the evolution of WBC, splenomegaly (SMG) and extramedullary disease (EMD). Patients received a median number of 3 (range 1-27) cycles of decitabine and 12 patients received at least 6 cycles. Seven (19.4%) patients were responders including 3 marrow CR (mCR), 2 stable disease (SD) with HI-E, 1 SD with HI-N and HI-P and 1 SD with HI-N. In a CMML patient with SD, specific skin lesions resolved with decitabine. Responses were generally short lived (2-5 months) except 1 responder currently ongoing with +11 months follow up. Two non-responders had prolonged SD (without HI) of 21 and 27 months duration respectively. Median OS from onset of decitabine was 7.3 months, without significant difference between responders and non-responders. Treatment with decitabine after azacitidine failure yielded modest ORR (19.4%) with short response duration and poor OS. Thus, use of decitabine in such patients who failed or progressed after azacitidine cannot be recommended, underscoring the need for novel strategies in this setting.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Azacitidine failure; CMML; Decitabine; MDS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25735917     DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Res        ISSN: 0145-2126            Impact factor:   3.156


  16 in total

Review 1.  Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher R Cogle; Bart L Scott; Thomas Boyd; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 2.  How and when to decide between epigenetic therapy and chemotherapy in patients with AML.

Authors:  Hervé Dombret; Raphael Itzykson
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

3.  A phase II study of omacetaxine mepesuccinate for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia after failure of hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Elias Jabbour; Kiran Naqvi; Ami Patel; Jing Ning; Koji Sasaki; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Prithviraj Bose; Steven M Kornblau; Koichi Takahashi; Michael Andreeff; Gabriela Sanchez-Petitto; Zeev Estrov; Courtney D Dinardo; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; Marina Konopleva; Yesid Alvarado; Kapil N Bhalla; Warren Fiskus; Maria Khouri; Rubiul Islam; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Phase I Clinical Trial of DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor Decitabine and PARP Inhibitor Talazoparib Combination Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Maria R Baer; Aksinija A Kogan; Søren M Bentzen; Tian Mi; Rena G Lapidus; Vu H Duong; Ashkan Emadi; Sandrine Niyongere; Casey L O'Connell; Benjamin A Youngblood; Stephen B Baylin; Feyruz V Rassool
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 5.  Hypomethylating agents (HMA) treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes: alternatives in the frontline and relapse settings.

Authors:  Natalie Uy; Abhay Singh; Steven D Gore; Thomas Prebet
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 6.  Hypomethylating agents (HMA) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: mechanisms of resistance and novel HMA-based therapies.

Authors:  Julia Stomper; John Charles Rotondo; Gabriele Greve; Michael Lübbert
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Phase 1/2 study of the WT1 peptide cancer vaccine WT4869 in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yasunori Ueda; Michinori Ogura; Shigesaburo Miyakoshi; Takahiro Suzuki; Yuji Heike; Shuzo Tagashira; Satoru Tsuchiya; Kazuma Ohyashiki; Yasushi Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  Proteomic Analysis Reveals Autophagy as Pro-Survival Pathway Elicited by Long-Term Exposure with 5-Azacitidine in High-Risk Myelodysplasia.

Authors:  Alessandra Romano; Cesarina Giallongo; Piera La Cava; Nunziatina L Parrinello; Antonella Chiechi; Calogero Vetro; Daniele Tibullo; Francesco Di Raimondo; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina; Giuseppe A Palumbo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  Current Therapy of the Patients with MDS: Walking towards Personalized Therapy.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Palacios-Berraquero; Ana Alfonso-Piérola
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Therapeutic approaches in myelofibrosis and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative overlap syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew L Sochacki; Melissa A Fischer; Michael R Savona
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.